Curt Doolittle

Theme: Predation

  • Roving Liberal Parasites

    Apr 17, 2020, 7:18 AM —“Voters drain the liberal states they live in then move the more conservative States and drain those dates and move again roaming parasites.”—Corey Ihler

  • the most profitable form of entrepreneurship

    Apr 21, 2020, 12:55 PM Whether you do it by horse, truck, boat, or ship, it’s all the same: piracy. It’s nearing time to Raise the Jolly Roger. Return to the most profitable form of entrepreneurship. Conquest.

  • the most profitable form of entrepreneurship

    Apr 21, 2020, 12:55 PM Whether you do it by horse, truck, boat, or ship, it’s all the same: piracy. It’s nearing time to Raise the Jolly Roger. Return to the most profitable form of entrepreneurship. Conquest.

  • Don”t Blame the Beast for Being a Beast

    Apr 22, 2020, 4:47 PM

    —“We could use a whole lot less of these types in America. Years of Marxism brainwashing and social engineering through media/Hollywood has made many forget what made us great in the first place. Also what keeps us going as a people and world powerhouse.”—Western Man @Fight4TheWest

    if you give rats a rat-utopia this is what they’ll do. Women and underclasses do not have centuries of vocabulary, bodies of thought, norms, traditions, institutions, to domesticate their impulses once freed from household labor, any more than men did freed from hunter-gathering. Don’t blame the semi domesticated animal. Blame the trainer who is a rare domesticated animal. We’re to blame. Aristocracy is bred like horses. And we failed to make an aristocracy of everyone without doing the breeding first, or developing the training first, before letting them out of the stables.

  • Don”t Blame the Beast for Being a Beast

    Apr 22, 2020, 4:47 PM

    —“We could use a whole lot less of these types in America. Years of Marxism brainwashing and social engineering through media/Hollywood has made many forget what made us great in the first place. Also what keeps us going as a people and world powerhouse.”—Western Man @Fight4TheWest

    if you give rats a rat-utopia this is what they’ll do. Women and underclasses do not have centuries of vocabulary, bodies of thought, norms, traditions, institutions, to domesticate their impulses once freed from household labor, any more than men did freed from hunter-gathering. Don’t blame the semi domesticated animal. Blame the trainer who is a rare domesticated animal. We’re to blame. Aristocracy is bred like horses. And we failed to make an aristocracy of everyone without doing the breeding first, or developing the training first, before letting them out of the stables.

  • Man – Organization – War

    Conflict (AND WAR)

    ( …. ) Three choices THE THIRD QUESTION OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHYThe question isn’t how we get along, it’s Genghis Khan’s question: “Why should the strong refrain from decimation, enslavement, enserfment, or rule for maximum profit?” The only incentive for the strong is whether cooperation is preferable to conquest. It is only preferable for conquest if it is sufficiently preferable to conquest to refrain from conquest. So, as the Great Khan said: “Given that cooperation is not preferable or possible, and serfdom and slavery are costly, that leaves decimation, or rule for the maximization of profit.”“We might prefer the former or the latter. However the enemy would undoubtedly prefer separation to decimation or rule under out maximization of profit. And this is the wise choice. Since we can still cooperate indirectly by trade while having no influence over one another within the same polity.” The problem the Khan faced is that he lacked the ability to produce institutions capable of sustained rule, just as expansionary aryans lacked the ability to produce institutions of sustained rule for maximum profit. The Indo-Aryans succeeded only under decimation and replacement in europe, not by any other means. The europeans killed the males and kept the females. The Persians stayed insular but were invaded by the Arabs, the indo-iranian’s are gone. The Anatolians are gone. The Caucasians are all but gone. So the Khan was wrong. Decimation was the right answer.

  • Man – Organization – War

    Conflict (AND WAR)

    ( …. ) Three choices THE THIRD QUESTION OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHYThe question isn’t how we get along, it’s Genghis Khan’s question: “Why should the strong refrain from decimation, enslavement, enserfment, or rule for maximum profit?” The only incentive for the strong is whether cooperation is preferable to conquest. It is only preferable for conquest if it is sufficiently preferable to conquest to refrain from conquest. So, as the Great Khan said: “Given that cooperation is not preferable or possible, and serfdom and slavery are costly, that leaves decimation, or rule for the maximization of profit.”“We might prefer the former or the latter. However the enemy would undoubtedly prefer separation to decimation or rule under out maximization of profit. And this is the wise choice. Since we can still cooperate indirectly by trade while having no influence over one another within the same polity.” The problem the Khan faced is that he lacked the ability to produce institutions capable of sustained rule, just as expansionary aryans lacked the ability to produce institutions of sustained rule for maximum profit. The Indo-Aryans succeeded only under decimation and replacement in europe, not by any other means. The europeans killed the males and kept the females. The Persians stayed insular but were invaded by the Arabs, the indo-iranian’s are gone. The Anatolians are gone. The Caucasians are all but gone. So the Khan was wrong. Decimation was the right answer.

  • Man – Organization – Group Strategy

    Group Strategies

    ( … ) Well-Sitting – Resource Curse ( … ) Production (hinduism, christendom, japan, china) ( … ) Parasitism (organized crime, gypsies, everywhere) ( … ) Raiding (steppe, desert, russia) ( … ) Human Domestication and Farming ( europeanism, han-ism) ( … ) Conquest and Consumption  (islam, globalism, semitism) ( … ) Undermining and destruction (judaism, communism) ( … )

  • Man – Organization – Group Strategy

    Group Strategies

    ( … ) Well-Sitting – Resource Curse ( … ) Production (hinduism, christendom, japan, china) ( … ) Parasitism (organized crime, gypsies, everywhere) ( … ) Raiding (steppe, desert, russia) ( … ) Human Domestication and Farming ( europeanism, han-ism) ( … ) Conquest and Consumption  (islam, globalism, semitism) ( … ) Undermining and destruction (judaism, communism) ( … )

  • Man – Cooperation – Immorality

    Immorality

    THE SUPPRESSION OF PARASITISM 4 – Man conducts parasitism by violence, theft, fraud, fraud by obscurantism, fraud by moralizing, fraud by omission, externality, free riding, privatization of commons, socialization of losses, conspiracy, conversion, immigration, conquest, war and genocide. 3 – Man must act to preserve and extend cooperation by the suppression of parasitism without which parasitism creates the disincentive to cooperate, and therefore decreases the disproportion­ate rewards of acquisition through cooperation. 5 – Man suppresses parasitism by threats of interpersonal violence, promises of interpersonal violence, interpersonal violence, interpersonal ostracization from cooperation, organized ostracization via norms and commerce, when he must by remuneration, and when he can by organized violence in law and war. 7 – Man suppresses parasitism by threats of interpersonal violencepromises of interpersonal violence, use of interpersonal violence, interpersonal ostracisation from cooperation, organized ostracisation via norms and commerce, when he must by remuneration, and when he can by organized violence in law and war.

    • If we define Moral Intuitions as the reactions we feel in response to our thoughts and actions and those of others.
    • If we define Normative Morality as the reactions we feel given for methods of decidability given some set of assumptions.
    • If we define philosophy (positive and literary) as the search for methods of decidability within a domain of preference and;
    • If we define truth (negative and descriptive) as the search for methods of decidability across all domains regardless of preference.

    Then:

    • We find that personal moral intuition is the product of our genes, and our experiential development. And it varies greatly from individual to individual.
    • We find that existing normative morality is the product of evolutionary accident and we learn it through experience and observation – although it does vary a little from individual to individual within groups, and varies widely between groups.