Curt Doolittle

Theme: Predation

  • Man – Cooperation – Immorality

    Immorality

    THE SUPPRESSION OF PARASITISM 4 – Man conducts parasitism by violence, theft, fraud, fraud by obscurantism, fraud by moralizing, fraud by omission, externality, free riding, privatization of commons, socialization of losses, conspiracy, conversion, immigration, conquest, war and genocide. 3 – Man must act to preserve and extend cooperation by the suppression of parasitism without which parasitism creates the disincentive to cooperate, and therefore decreases the disproportion­ate rewards of acquisition through cooperation. 5 – Man suppresses parasitism by threats of interpersonal violence, promises of interpersonal violence, interpersonal violence, interpersonal ostracization from cooperation, organized ostracization via norms and commerce, when he must by remuneration, and when he can by organized violence in law and war. 7 – Man suppresses parasitism by threats of interpersonal violencepromises of interpersonal violence, use of interpersonal violence, interpersonal ostracisation from cooperation, organized ostracisation via norms and commerce, when he must by remuneration, and when he can by organized violence in law and war.

    • If we define Moral Intuitions as the reactions we feel in response to our thoughts and actions and those of others.
    • If we define Normative Morality as the reactions we feel given for methods of decidability given some set of assumptions.
    • If we define philosophy (positive and literary) as the search for methods of decidability within a domain of preference and;
    • If we define truth (negative and descriptive) as the search for methods of decidability across all domains regardless of preference.

    Then:

    • We find that personal moral intuition is the product of our genes, and our experiential development. And it varies greatly from individual to individual.
    • We find that existing normative morality is the product of evolutionary accident and we learn it through experience and observation – although it does vary a little from individual to individual within groups, and varies widely between groups.

  • 60’s Radicals and their bombings

    May 2, 2020, 9:01 AM

    —“In the 1960’s the radicals were too small a percentage of the population to be a real threat, so their bombings was not regarded as the tip of any iceberg (except when blacks got involved and there was concern that all blacks would revolt). … Today the revolt against over-reach represents a larger group of people, and therefore has to be taken more seriously.”—Red-State Secession

  • 60’s Radicals and their bombings

    May 2, 2020, 9:01 AM

    —“In the 1960’s the radicals were too small a percentage of the population to be a real threat, so their bombings was not regarded as the tip of any iceberg (except when blacks got involved and there was concern that all blacks would revolt). … Today the revolt against over-reach represents a larger group of people, and therefore has to be taken more seriously.”—Red-State Secession

  • “There is only peace in east asia because of the american navy”. China is a bad

    “There is only peace in east asia because of the american navy”. China is a bad neighbor. Slow, hidden, dishonest violence. It’s not to worry. China will be stupid as always. Too proud as always. Will fail as always. It will just take time. This is why party lies. They know.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 15:07:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259137813964038145

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259112358896521216

  • It’s Our Duty to Protect Those Victimized by Baiting Into Hazard

    It’s Our Duty to Protect Those Victimized by Baiting Into Hazard https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/09/its-our-duty-to-protect-those-victimized-by-baiting-into-hazard/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 14:59:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259135915513053190

  • It’s Our Duty to Protect Those Victimized by Baiting Into Hazard

    May 3, 2020, 5:51 PM by Scott De Warren [N]oblesse oblige. Yes, ironically, It is our duty to protect our people, especially the majority that lack agency and the discernment to detect the enemy’s propaganda that baits them into hazard (and pulls the rest of us down with them). The irony is that these, our own people, constantly betray us by siding with the enemy. In England, France, and even America our people were encouraged to rebel against their king and aristocracy – often on the thinnest of pretexts. In the American revolution, for ex., Samuel Adams organized the rough dock workers to attack the upper classes and destroy their fine houses over what was essentially a 1% tax imposed by Britain on legal papers. Now the descendants of those dockworkers pay 50% taxes without blinking. Yet they will still rail against kings and aristocrats – the ones that taxed them 1% to protect them militarily while praising foreign hostiles that tax them 50% while taking way their borders, liberties, and that sponsor third world invasions because it is all sold as ‘democratic’. No, the people will be protected from such lies going forward by making the liars answerable in a court of law.

    —“You have no duty to those that have betrayed you. If anything, the duty to those that haven’t betrayed you is to punish those that have.”—Martin Štěpán

  • It’s Our Duty to Protect Those Victimized by Baiting Into Hazard

    May 3, 2020, 5:51 PM by Scott De Warren [N]oblesse oblige. Yes, ironically, It is our duty to protect our people, especially the majority that lack agency and the discernment to detect the enemy’s propaganda that baits them into hazard (and pulls the rest of us down with them). The irony is that these, our own people, constantly betray us by siding with the enemy. In England, France, and even America our people were encouraged to rebel against their king and aristocracy – often on the thinnest of pretexts. In the American revolution, for ex., Samuel Adams organized the rough dock workers to attack the upper classes and destroy their fine houses over what was essentially a 1% tax imposed by Britain on legal papers. Now the descendants of those dockworkers pay 50% taxes without blinking. Yet they will still rail against kings and aristocrats – the ones that taxed them 1% to protect them militarily while praising foreign hostiles that tax them 50% while taking way their borders, liberties, and that sponsor third world invasions because it is all sold as ‘democratic’. No, the people will be protected from such lies going forward by making the liars answerable in a court of law.

    —“You have no duty to those that have betrayed you. If anything, the duty to those that haven’t betrayed you is to punish those that have.”—Martin Štěpán

  • AVERSARIALISM = EMPIRICISM = COMPETITION, MARKETS, DUEL, COURT, where reciprocit

    AVERSARIALISM = EMPIRICISM = COMPETITION, MARKETS, DUEL, COURT, where reciprocity is the only reason not to fight. Reciprocity not because it is good, but because it is the only reason not to fight, prey, war.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-07 00:29:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258192080633028609

    Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258172715720204295

  • Man desires consumption, consumption is increased by opportunity, and opportunit

    Man desires consumption, consumption is increased by opportunity, and opportunity is increased by liberty, but so is irresponsibility. And so is free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, immigration, conversion, conquest, and genocide.

    The state evolved to incrementally suppress local parasitism decreasing local transaction costs, in exchange for paying taxes to pay the cost of decreasing local transaction costs. This made markets possible where only primitive trade previously existed.

    Man is amoral by nature, and pragmatic. By the institution of parenting, acculturation, indoctrination, training, laws, restitution, punishment, and prevention we invest in his domestication.

    Man develops theology, philosophy, ideologies, rationalizations, myths, fantasies, and various other forms of frauds, to attempt to obscure and justify his free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime.

    In order to produce the suppression of free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime, requires a power law of institutions of prevention, investigation, dispute resolution, prosecution, restitution, punishment and prevention.

    In order to produce a market requires a pareto distribution of assets, so that the organization of networks in an market can produce a complex division of labor and its returns without which the terms freedom and liberty have no meaning.

    In order to produce a society that tolerates market competition and the suppression of free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime, requires the resulting distribution of rewards satisfy a marginal nash equilibrium.

    Given three possible means of coercion: force-defense (Military-police, government), trade-boycott(commerce-law), and advocacy+insurance-undermining+ostracization(social,education,religion), elites will combine to use and misuse these skills in a competition.

    Given that Man varies greatly from barely human to superhuman in physical, social, and intellectual ability, and sexual, social, economic, political, and military value, and given the power, pareto, and nash necessities of distributions, man will sort by value to others by his value in those markets – producing networks of competing and overlapping hierarchies that we call sexual, social, economic, and political class.

    As such, rule of law and the independent judiciary provide a market for the suppression of criminality by not only individuals and groups of individuals, but elites in all three dimensions of elites, such that sovereignty, liberty and freedom are maintained DESPITE the presence of necessary hierarchies.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-03 18:58:00 UTC

  • IT’S OUR DUTY TO PROTECT THOSE VICTIMIZED BY BAITING INTO HAZARD by Scott De War

    IT’S OUR DUTY TO PROTECT THOSE VICTIMIZED BY BAITING INTO HAZARD

    by Scott De Warren

    Noblesse oblige. Yes, ironically, It is our duty to protect our people, especially the majority that lack agency and the discernment to detect the enemy’s propaganda that baits them into hazard (and pulls the rest of us down with them).

    The irony is that these, our own people, constantly betray us by siding with the enemy.

    In England, France, and even America our people were encouraged to rebel against their king and aristocracy – often on the thinnest of pretexts.

    In the American revolution, for ex., Samuel Adams organized the rough dock workers to attack the upper classes and destroy their fine houses over what was essentially a 1% tax imposed by Britain on legal papers.

    Now the descendants of those dockworkers pay 50% taxes without blinking. Yet they will still rail against kings and aristocrats – the ones that taxed them 1% to protect them militarily while praising foreign hostiles that tax them 50% while taking way their borders, liberties, and that sponsor third world invasions because it is all sold as ‘democratic’.

    No, the people will be protected from such lies going forward by making the liars answerable in a court of law.

    —“You have no duty to those that have betrayed you. If anything, the duty to those that haven’t betrayed you is to punish those that have.”—Martin Štěpán

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-03 17:51:00 UTC