Feb 1, 2020, 7:45 PM See, you don’t get it. The only reason not to conquer, deprive, exploit, enserf, enslave, or end – or worse, is reciprocity. You see, ‘sovereign means’ capable of defense – every man a sovereign: a king, a legislature, a knight, a husband, a craftsman and all else he might be. That is why natural law and international law are the same: because no man has say over another unless he violates the sovereignty of another – and if so then they may war. If they choose not to war they may duel. If they choose not to duel they may seek decision from the people in a jury. If they do not abide by the jury they have lost the insurance of their sovereign peers, and are limited to their own defense. And as such, they will easily be the victims of war by the polity rather than just their prior enemy. We are the men of Europa. We are sovereigns – all. And to violate that sovereignty is to invite us into war.
Theme: Predation
-
Yes P Is a Universalist Program
Feb 3, 2020, 8:13 PM Yes P is a universalist program. It says that all people can transcend ignorance, superstition, fraud, baiting into hazard, rent seeking, organized crime, corruption, tyranny, hard labor, poverty, disease, suffering, conversion, immigration, conquest if they adopt P-rule of law with universal standing in the commons, state-private capital investment, state consumer credit, and SOFT EUGENICS. But that if you don’t adopt soft eugenics and rule of law then you will not be able to do any of the above with any degree of certainty for any substantial period of time. P is just physics applied to social science.
-
Yes P Is a Universalist Program
Feb 3, 2020, 8:13 PM Yes P is a universalist program. It says that all people can transcend ignorance, superstition, fraud, baiting into hazard, rent seeking, organized crime, corruption, tyranny, hard labor, poverty, disease, suffering, conversion, immigration, conquest if they adopt P-rule of law with universal standing in the commons, state-private capital investment, state consumer credit, and SOFT EUGENICS. But that if you don’t adopt soft eugenics and rule of law then you will not be able to do any of the above with any degree of certainty for any substantial period of time. P is just physics applied to social science.
-
They Just Want to Consume
They Just Want to Consume https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/they-just-want-to-consume/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 06:49:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264448473472040960
-
They Just Want to Consume
Feb 4, 2020, 9:46 AM
—“I think you nailed it a few years ago. We’re primarily focused on improvement and transcendence while they don’t even want to participate just seize, re-distribute, and spend down capital and wealth.”—James Santagata
-
They Just Want to Consume
Feb 4, 2020, 9:46 AM
—“I think you nailed it a few years ago. We’re primarily focused on improvement and transcendence while they don’t even want to participate just seize, re-distribute, and spend down capital and wealth.”—James Santagata
-
They Always Want to Lie Cheat and Steal – Becaues They Don”t Want to Self-Police (they Have No Agency)
Feb 4, 2020, 4:01 PM
—“Ok the way the comments are here maybe you should call it totalitarianism. If the is what you want to do thats fine but take that shit to a deserted island and have at it”–John Lafferty
Your only objection to natural law is to say that you have the right to impose costs upon others against their will. It means you want to lie, cheat, steal. So it means you’re a bad person. That’s all natural law prevents: lying, cheating, stealing, harming, directly or indirectly. SO why do you want to preserve lying, cheating, stealing, and harm? So you can lie cheat steal and harm?
-
They Always Want to Lie Cheat and Steal – Becaues They Don”t Want to Self-Police (they Have No Agency)
Feb 4, 2020, 4:01 PM
—“Ok the way the comments are here maybe you should call it totalitarianism. If the is what you want to do thats fine but take that shit to a deserted island and have at it”–John Lafferty
Your only objection to natural law is to say that you have the right to impose costs upon others against their will. It means you want to lie, cheat, steal. So it means you’re a bad person. That’s all natural law prevents: lying, cheating, stealing, harming, directly or indirectly. SO why do you want to preserve lying, cheating, stealing, and harm? So you can lie cheat steal and harm?
-
The Right to Self Determination
Feb 11, 2020, 5:34 PM We either have the right to self determination – or we have the right to extermination. So choose. (I’m happy either way.) Genomes, genetic distributions, institutions, culture, traditions, norms, manners, ethics, morals, laws, history, myth, legend, monuments, territory, are all assets. Some assets are valuable. Some are not. Some are harmful. If we choose to preserve an asset, we do so. 1) We know that moral intuition is genetic, sex biased, and that only trauma can change it – even then only slightly. We know that all traits are somewhere between 70-80% heritable and the rest is idiosyncratic accumulation rather than patterns of environment. 2) We know that class is genetic, with lower classes accumulating more loads (defects), upper middle the fewest, and aside from noble families, the upper classes random lottery results from the middle – but otherwise there is little to no class rotation. 3) We know that moral biases reflect female (herd, infant-equality, devotion, consumption) strategy and the male (pack, mature-hierarchy, loyalty, capitalization) instinct and that females use social superpredation by undermining, and males political superpredation by violence. 4) We know that each of us is born with a bias in female (lateral breadth) vs male(longitudinal velocity) brain structures, and that the stereotype of male analytic and female empathic is physical construction, and that given freedom to do so we pursue interests fitting our bias. 5) We know that at present we are wealthy enough to want to diverge by the female, empathic, equalitarian, consumptive, infantilized, and underdeveloped strategy and some by the male, analytic, hierarchical, capitalizing, and mature strategy. And so we must separate or civil war. 6) Because while you are of the opinion that you reason, you have very little agency. And if you did, and you had knowledge, you would know that the female strategy is dysgenic, the left’s strategy is dysgenic, and standard of living is dependent on the center of the distribution. 7) So if you want to feel harmony in suicide and bring about another dark age of ignorance, this time with social construction of the myth of possible equality, the only result of which will be dysgenia and decline – we are fine with it. But you can’t take the rest of us with you. 8) Some of us are more than semi domesticated animals sensing, perceiving, feeling, experiencing intuiting, and responding to incentives to hyper consume. And some of us are willing to let you turn your cities into dysgenic favelas. Which is what we plan to let you do.
-
The Right to Self Determination
Feb 11, 2020, 5:34 PM We either have the right to self determination – or we have the right to extermination. So choose. (I’m happy either way.) Genomes, genetic distributions, institutions, culture, traditions, norms, manners, ethics, morals, laws, history, myth, legend, monuments, territory, are all assets. Some assets are valuable. Some are not. Some are harmful. If we choose to preserve an asset, we do so. 1) We know that moral intuition is genetic, sex biased, and that only trauma can change it – even then only slightly. We know that all traits are somewhere between 70-80% heritable and the rest is idiosyncratic accumulation rather than patterns of environment. 2) We know that class is genetic, with lower classes accumulating more loads (defects), upper middle the fewest, and aside from noble families, the upper classes random lottery results from the middle – but otherwise there is little to no class rotation. 3) We know that moral biases reflect female (herd, infant-equality, devotion, consumption) strategy and the male (pack, mature-hierarchy, loyalty, capitalization) instinct and that females use social superpredation by undermining, and males political superpredation by violence. 4) We know that each of us is born with a bias in female (lateral breadth) vs male(longitudinal velocity) brain structures, and that the stereotype of male analytic and female empathic is physical construction, and that given freedom to do so we pursue interests fitting our bias. 5) We know that at present we are wealthy enough to want to diverge by the female, empathic, equalitarian, consumptive, infantilized, and underdeveloped strategy and some by the male, analytic, hierarchical, capitalizing, and mature strategy. And so we must separate or civil war. 6) Because while you are of the opinion that you reason, you have very little agency. And if you did, and you had knowledge, you would know that the female strategy is dysgenic, the left’s strategy is dysgenic, and standard of living is dependent on the center of the distribution. 7) So if you want to feel harmony in suicide and bring about another dark age of ignorance, this time with social construction of the myth of possible equality, the only result of which will be dysgenia and decline – we are fine with it. But you can’t take the rest of us with you. 8) Some of us are more than semi domesticated animals sensing, perceiving, feeling, experiencing intuiting, and responding to incentives to hyper consume. And some of us are willing to let you turn your cities into dysgenic favelas. Which is what we plan to let you do.