Rational < Calculative < Operational > Computational > Simulational
Theme: Operationalism
-
The only measure of a theology, philosophy, or ideology is the social, economic,
The only measure of a theology, philosophy, or ideology is the social, economic, scientific, technological, intellectual and military standing of a its practitioners.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 10:08:00 UTC
-
I do my job. I am very good at my job. That job is to produce testimonial truth.
I do my job. I am very good at my job. That job is to produce testimonial truth. That truth requires extraordinary efforts of research, disambiguation,serialization, and operationalization, that’s sufficient to satisfy the demand for infallibility.(And I chat this way to improve)
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 01:57:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271622785551470592
Reply addressees: @yat_es @Salamandrens @Outsideness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271621435291832326
-
I do my job. I am very good at my job. That job is to produce testimonial truth.
I do my job. I am very good at my job. That job is to produce testimonial truth. That truth requires extraordinary efforts of research, disambiguation,serialization, and operationalization, that’s sufficient to satisfy the demand for infallibility.(And I chat this way to improve)
Reply addressees: @yat_es @Salamandrens @Outsideness -
Three is more intellectual consistency to P than there is to even the foundation
Three is more intellectual consistency to P than there is to even the foundations of mathematics (sets), for the simple reason that it’s constrained by realism, naturalism, and operationalism (actions) in addition to identity, logic, empiricism, incentives, and reciprocity.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-10 19:48:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270804959156744196
-
Three is more intellectual consistency to P than there is to even the foundation
Three is more intellectual consistency to P than there is to even the foundations of mathematics (sets), for the simple reason that it’s constrained by realism, naturalism, and operationalism (actions) in addition to identity, logic, empiricism, incentives, and reciprocity.
-
I sign of intelligence is the reduction of all speech to measurement that we cal
I sign of intelligence is the reduction of all speech to measurement that we call testimony:
operational language, in promissory form, absent the verb to be, in complete sentences, from the observer’s point of view, consisting of a series of transactions of changes in state. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 21:36:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270107405074956288
Reply addressees: @patacar
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270106643204800513
-
I sign of intelligence is the reduction of all speech to measurement that we cal
I sign of intelligence is the reduction of all speech to measurement that we call testimony:
operational language, in promissory form, absent the verb to be, in complete sentences, from the observer’s point of view, consisting of a series of transactions of changes in state. 😉
Reply addressees: @patacar -
A LITTLE CONTEXT FOR THOSE NEW TO P-LAW Mix programming (operational logic), leg
A LITTLE CONTEXT FOR THOSE NEW TO P-LAW
Mix programming (operational logic), legal argument, and economic evidence and that’s what you get: P-Law. Mostly what I do is what in software is called a Class. Technically speaking P uses the process of object oriented analysis and design, to produce Types (definitions) and Classes of Objects, where the only permissible functions are human actions and equilibrating reactions (economics). That’s why it’s possible to write a compiler (test) for p-law. If I can GET to completing it, the “idiots guide to P’ is just an introduction to writing sciences, and in particular law, with object oriented programming.
=====
(humor)
—“P uses Coding to pass variables but your only libraries are human.dll and scarcity.dll.”— Andrew M Gilmour
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 16:24:00 UTC
-
I do natural law of reciprocity, and testimonial truth by realism, naturalism, o
I do natural law of reciprocity, and testimonial truth by realism, naturalism, operationalism, empiricism, and full accounting. So, sorry. It’s a sort of equal-opportunity methodology for slaying sacred cows regardless of race, creed or culture.
Truth has no mercy.
Learn P-Law.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 03:49:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269838938304393217