The rest of us are trying to end what you and yours brought. Even your efforts at geometric unity vs say, Wolfram’s computational operationalism, or Hilbert’s project, illustrate the cognitive problem: We do realism, naturalism, operationalism, and decidability.
You don’t. Why?
Reply addressees: @BretWeinstein
Theme: Operationalism
-
The rest of us are trying to end what you and yours brought. Even your efforts a
-
My job is to reform thought
(worth repeating) My job is to reform thought by increasing precision using disambiguation, serialization, operational language. Not to excuse the existing imprecision of thought. That frequently requires re-definition of terms whenever possible, and neologisms as a last resort.
-
My job is to reform thought
(worth repeating) My job is to reform thought by increasing precision using disambiguation, serialization, operational language. Not to excuse the existing imprecision of thought. That frequently requires re-definition of terms whenever possible, and neologisms as a last resort.
-

Producing Measurements by Triangulation
Triangulation. It’s the same process as disambiguation by Serialization and operationalization. Use of adversarial competition to rank by one or more dimensions. Art is the best example of something we presume can’t be objectively measured. But we can judge almost anything by the accumulated excellence of human actions: caloric content (more dependencies is better). Take an art movement. Take the examples of that movement. analyze and rank by craftsmanship(construction, technique, materials), design(aesthetics, composition, light, color, texture, ), meaning (content, simple content to high content). Compare the ultimate achievements of that movement with those that were less so. Order them – this is triangulation. “Where does this fit between what other two?” You will notice that the progression is not linear but logarithmic, with many adequate pieces and few superior. You now have an ordinal if logarithmically scaling measure if not a cardinal and linear measure. Keep adding artworks until because of marginal indifference, you must categorize groups instead of stacking individual pieces. Now those categories produce a cardinal measure. Repeat for all art movements. Then stack those movements. You now have a metric for judging pieces (three dimensions), categories (one or three dimensions), and movements (one or three dimensions). Art is the hardest thing I know of, but the triangulation is how the brain works internally, so … well, there you go.

-

Producing Measurements by Triangulation
Triangulation. It’s the same process as disambiguation by Serialization and operationalization. Use of adversarial competition to rank by one or more dimensions. Art is the best example of something we presume can’t be objectively measured. But we can judge almost anything by the accumulated excellence of human actions: caloric content (more dependencies is better). Take an art movement. Take the examples of that movement. analyze and rank by craftsmanship(construction, technique, materials), design(aesthetics, composition, light, color, texture, ), meaning (content, simple content to high content). Compare the ultimate achievements of that movement with those that were less so. Order them – this is triangulation. “Where does this fit between what other two?” You will notice that the progression is not linear but logarithmic, with many adequate pieces and few superior. You now have an ordinal if logarithmically scaling measure if not a cardinal and linear measure. Keep adding artworks until because of marginal indifference, you must categorize groups instead of stacking individual pieces. Now those categories produce a cardinal measure. Repeat for all art movements. Then stack those movements. You now have a metric for judging pieces (three dimensions), categories (one or three dimensions), and movements (one or three dimensions). Art is the hardest thing I know of, but the triangulation is how the brain works internally, so … well, there you go.

-

PRODUCING MEASUREMENTS BY TRIANGULATION Triangulation. It’s the same process as
PRODUCING MEASUREMENTS BY TRIANGULATION
Triangulation. It’s the same process as disambiguation by Serialization and operationalization. Use of adversarial competition to rank by one or more dimensions.
Art is the best example of something we presume can’t be objectively me… https://t.co/CpqdvYVots
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-25 16:27:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287061928435646464
-

PRODUCING MEASUREMENTS BY TRIANGULATION Triangulation. It’s the same process as
PRODUCING MEASUREMENTS BY TRIANGULATION
Triangulation. It’s the same process as disambiguation by Serialization and operationalization. Use of adversarial competition to rank by one or more dimensions.
Art is the best example of something we presume can’t be objectively me… https://t.co/CpqdvYVots
-

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/116345964_337645997633560_6430409338
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/116345964_337645997633560_6430409338022713108_n_337645994300227.jpg PRODUCING MEASUREMENTS BY TRIANGULATION
Triangulation. It’s the same process as disambiguation by Serialization and operationalization. Use of adversarial competition to rank by one or more dimensions.
Art is the best example of something we presume can’t be objectively measured.
But we can judge almost anything by the accumulated excellence of human actions: caloric content (more dependencies is better).
Take an art movement. Take the examples of that movement. analyze and rank by craftsmanship(construction, technique, materials), design(aesthetics, composition, light, color, texture, ), meaning (content, simple content to high content).
Compare the ultimate achievements of that movement with those that were less so. Order them – this is triangulation. “Where does this fit between what other two?”
You will notice that the progression is not linear but logarithmic, with many adequate pieces and few superior.
You now have an ordinal if logarithmically scaling measure if not a cardinal and linear measure.
Keep adding artworks until because of marginal indifference, you must categorize groups instead of stacking individual pieces.
Now those categories produce a cardinal measure. Repeat for all art movements.
Then stack those movements.
You now have a metric for judging pieces (three dimensions), categories (one or three dimensions), and movements (one or three dimensions).
Art is the hardest thing I know of, but the triangulation is how the brain works internally, so … well, there you go.PRODUCING MEASUREMENTS BY TRIANGULATION
Triangulation. It’s the same process as disambiguation by Serialization and operationalization. Use of adversarial competition to rank by one or more dimensions.
Art is the best example of something we presume can’t be objectively measured.
But we can judge almost anything by the accumulated excellence of human actions: caloric content (more dependencies is better).
Take an art movement. Take the examples of that movement. analyze and rank by craftsmanship(construction, technique, materials), design(aesthetics, composition, light, color, texture, ), meaning (content, simple content to high content).
Compare the ultimate achievements of that movement with those that were less so. Order them – this is triangulation. “Where does this fit between what other two?”
You will notice that the progression is not linear but logarithmic, with many adequate pieces and few superior.
You now have an ordinal if logarithmically scaling measure if not a cardinal and linear measure.
Keep adding artworks until because of marginal indifference, you must categorize groups instead of stacking individual pieces.
Now those categories produce a cardinal measure. Repeat for all art movements.
Then stack those movements.
You now have a metric for judging pieces (three dimensions), categories (one or three dimensions), and movements (one or three dimensions).
Art is the hardest thing I know of, but the triangulation is how the brain works internally, so … well, there you go.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-25 12:27:00 UTC
-
define “actionable reality”
—“Can you define “actionable reality” in the following statement? What is actionable reality? : “You eliminate all falsehoods, and what remains is a truth candidate. You eliminate all falsehoods by attempting to falsify each dimension of actionable reality. (Thanks)”–Daniel T. Johnson
Actionable = testable. Logically (mental) rationally (incentives) Physical (action) the spirit worlds are not actionable Ideal worlds are not actionable fictional worlds are not actioanble imaginary worlds are not actionable
-
Yo’d have to demonstrate you knew the first thing about it, and the difference b
Yo’d have to demonstrate you knew the first thing about it, and the difference between logic, formal logic, operational logic, philosophy, ideology, and theology.
My work is a formal operational logic of jurisprudence, which results iin the formal logic of social science.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-12 13:46:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282310277699174402
Reply addressees: @JackyDawg
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282309508140634115