Yo’d have to demonstrate you knew the first thing about it, and the difference between logic, formal logic, operational logic, philosophy, ideology, and theology.
My work is a formal operational logic of jurisprudence, which results iin the formal logic of social science.
Reply addressees: @JackyDawg
Theme: Operationalism
-
Yo’d have to demonstrate you knew the first thing about it, and the difference b
-
(Operational prose. It’s hard to think in it. Harder to write in it. But it’s th
(Operational prose. It’s hard to think in it. Harder to write in it. But it’s the logic of the falsification of lying using ‘false promises, baiting into hazard’, of the nature of man, the malleability of man, limitless growth, and oppression vs domestication. )
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-08 21:42:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1280980719750328324
Reply addressees: @poldiscourse17 @cpicciolini @jjmacnab @egavactip
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1278825675944845314
-
(Operational prose. It’s hard to think in it. Harder to write in it. But it’s th
(Operational prose. It’s hard to think in it. Harder to write in it. But it’s the logic of the falsification of lying using ‘false promises, baiting into hazard’, of the nature of man, the malleability of man, limitless growth, and oppression vs domestication. )
Reply addressees: @poldiscourse17 @cpicciolini @jjmacnab @egavactip -
True but we use disambiguation by serialization and operationalization so that t
True but we use disambiguation by serialization and operationalization so that they cannot be conflated in law.
I think things thru. Its scary really.
And there isnt any cure for it. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-27 23:01:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277014186892165121
Reply addressees: @MeringueMrs
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277013315882008577
-
True but we use disambiguation by serialization and operationalization so that t
True but we use disambiguation by serialization and operationalization so that they cannot be conflated in law.
I think things thru. Its scary really.
And there isnt any cure for it. 😉
Reply addressees: @MeringueMrs -
If it’s not testifiable you can’t claim it’s true, or even that you know it to b
If it’s not testifiable you can’t claim it’s true, or even that you know it to be true – only that you are wiling to lie to yourself and others that despite that you can’t claim it’s true, or know it to be true.
That’s why it’s faith. it’s false. And that’s why faith works.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-21 12:08:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274675627589763072
Reply addressees: @HenryMalcom4 @KSI_HEADHUNT3R @Nationalist7346
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274672953939169280
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@HenryMalcom4 @KSI_HEADHUNT3R @Nationalist7346 False. Science and Facts rely on whether claims are testifiable: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism (actions), Identity, internal consistency, external correspondence, rational choice, reciprocity, limits and completeness, and warranty are required for testimony = Truth Claims.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1274672953939169280
-
False. Science and Facts rely on whether claims are testifiable: Realism, Natura
False. Science and Facts rely on whether claims are testifiable: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism (actions), Identity, internal consistency, external correspondence, rational choice, reciprocity, limits and completeness, and warranty are required for testimony = Truth Claims.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-21 11:58:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274672953939169280
Reply addressees: @HenryMalcom4 @KSI_HEADHUNT3R @Nationalist7346
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274664865441869824
-
False. Science and Facts rely on whether claims are testifiable: Realism, Natura
False. Science and Facts rely on whether claims are testifiable: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism (actions), Identity, internal consistency, external correspondence, rational choice, reciprocity, limits and completeness, and warranty are required for testimony = Truth Claims.
Reply addressees: @HenryMalcom4 @KSI_HEADHUNT3R @Nationalist7346 -
DISAMBIGUATION: “P VS APPLIED P” I see lot of confusion by not separating “P” (t
DISAMBIGUATION: “P VS APPLIED P”
I see lot of confusion by not separating “P” (the method) from various applications of the P-method. The method is close to using object oriented analysis and design to produce a programming language for law. So P-Method isn’t like libertarianism, or socialism, or some other political model. It’s a methodology. By applying P-Method we are trying to reform and restore our civilization. Method vs Application. Science vs Technology, Baking vs Cookies.
THE METHODOLOGY
1 – P-Metaphysics (realism, naturalism, operationalism, ….)
2 – P-Epistemology (brain, mind, consciousness, learning, epistemology, acquisition)
3 – P-Method (a method, the completion of the scientific method in a formal operational logic) of testing reciprocity in display word and deed.
… a) Disambiguation, serialization, competition (supply demand equilibration, evolution)
… b) The Grammars and Table of Grammars
… c) The Operational Grammar and Universal Commensurability
… … c’) The Specification for Man
… d) Reciprocity in Display word and Deed
… … d’) The set of definitions in series that result from disambiguating terms of reciprocity.
… e) Compatibilism (division of perception, cognition, knowledge and labor)
… f) Ternaryism, Tri-Coeercion – Tri-Functionalism
… g) Beckerian explanation of social phenomenon using economic analysis
APPLIED GENERALLY
4 – P-Method applied to History and Group Strategies
5 – P-Method as an explanation for the strategy and success of western civilization.
6 – P-Law, and Government (applied P to creating governments) and
APPLIED SPECIFICALLY
7 – P-New-Constitution for restoration of western civilization.
8 – P-Constitutions for various other civilizations.
Which thing are you talking about?
If it’s political it’s 7 or 8.
Newbies talk about 7-8 all the time.
That’s not P. That’s APPLIED-P.
P method is the formal logic of psychological and social science, if not all science.
P method combines all the philosophical and scientific categories.
So when you confuse confuse P-method(explanation) with political preferences (application) it’s the same as confusing science(explanation) with technology(application)
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-19 07:23:00 UTC
-
Rational < Calculative < Operational > Computational > Simulational
Rational < Calculative < Operational > Computational > Simulational
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-15 13:21:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272519584244027393