Curt Doolittle

Theme: Operationalism

  • THE SECOND SECRET OF LEARNING PROPERTARIANISM. For every reference you use, expr

    THE SECOND SECRET OF LEARNING PROPERTARIANISM.

    For every reference you use, express it as a position in a spectrum of at least three different states all of which share the same measurement (constant relation).

    The reason most things seem clearer or more insightful is that I use series’ of operational definitions to limit (as do all grammars) and emphasize, the constant relation I wish to illustrate.

    By describing a spectrum from coming into existence, to dropping from existence (failure) you create a definition wherein the priority of the properties of the category (causality) is not open to conflation or misinterpretation.

    And that is how Abrahamism causes deception: conflation and redirection (suggestion).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-28 10:49:00 UTC

  • The Second Secret Of Learning Propertarianism.

    For every reference you use, express it as a position in a spectrum of at least three different states all of which share the same measurement (constant relation). The reason most things seem clearer or more insightful is that I use series’ of operational definitions to limit (as do all grammars) and emphasize, the constant relation I wish to illustrate. By describing a spectrum from coming into existence, to dropping from existence (failure) you create a definition wherein the priority of the properties of the category (causality) is not open to conflation or misinterpretation. And that is how Abrahamism causes deception: conflation and redirection (suggestion).

  • (Almost impossible to say anything substantive in operational language free of i

    (Almost impossible to say anything substantive in operational language free of ignorance, error, biases, pretense, (and deceit) in a tweet.A perfect medium for gossip, shaming, rallying, and tit-for-tat – and terrible one for the competition between arguments. But we try anyway.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-25 15:19:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/956547008910839810

    Reply addressees: @HermanthePerson @analytic_philo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/947683277313159170

    IN REPLY TO:

    @HermanthePerson

    @analytic_philo In the spirit of analytic philosophy, you might need Twitter to increase its size limit to medium-sized essay: please define “everything” , “is”, “going” “to”, “be”, “okay” and “hopefully”, and you might like to shed light on the pragmatics of “,” and “.”

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/947683277313159170

  • (Almost impossible to say anything substantive in operational language free of i

    (Almost impossible to say anything substantive in operational language free of ignorance, error, biases, pretense, (and deceit) in a tweet.A perfect medium for gossip, shaming, rallying, and tit-for-tat – and terrible one for the competition between arguments. But we try anyway.)

  • (Almost impossible to say anything substantive in operational language free of i

    (Almost impossible to say anything substantive in operational language free of ignorance, error, biases, pretense, (and deceit) in a tweet.A perfect medium for gossip, shaming, rallying, and tit-for-tat – and terrible one for the competition between arguments. But we try anyway.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-25 10:19:00 UTC

  • (Almost impossible to say anything substantive in operational language free of i

    (Almost impossible to say anything substantive in operational language free of ignorance, error, biases, pretense, (and deceit) in a tweet.A perfect medium for gossip, shaming, rallying, and tit-for-tat – and terrible one for the competition between arguments. But we try anyway.)

  • I get a great deal of joy watching people develop after continuous exposure to p

    I get a great deal of joy watching people develop after continuous exposure to propertarianism, testimonials, operationalism, and natural law. It will change your life. Not so that you agree. But so that you are better at what you do. Operationalism is far more important than the other logics. They are dependent only upon speech, but operationalism is dependent upon speech that consists of actions, and actions consist of that which is possible.

  • I get a great deal of joy watching people develop after continuous exposure to p

    I get a great deal of joy watching people develop after continuous exposure to propertarianism, testimonials, operationalism, and natural law. It will change your life. Not so that you agree. But so that you are better at what you do. Operationalism is far more important than the other logics. They are dependent only upon speech, but operationalism is dependent upon speech that consists of actions, and actions consist of that which is possible.

  • I get a great deal of joy watching people develop after continuous exposure to p

    I get a great deal of joy watching people develop after continuous exposure to propertarianism, testimonials, operationalism, and natural law.

    It will change your life. Not so that you agree. But so that you are better at what you do. Operationalism is far more important than the other logics. They are dependent only upon speech, but operationalism is dependent upon speech that consists of actions, and actions consist of that which is possible.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-22 10:48:00 UTC

  • Magic And God And Frames

    –“I wonder what brought “magic” and “god” in one topic? People either measure through high context (not magic) low precision, or construe low context to look like high context so as to pretend the first (magic). Those who can ‘measure’ through low context, high precision can explain what they are doing, but the audience mostly can’t grok it… so they try use the audience’s language: high context, low precision.”— Mea Culba 1 – You are correct, but the terminology is ‘high context low precision’ vs ‘high precision, low context’. (I’ve modified your prose to make use of those terms instead) 2 – technically speaking there are very few grammars available to man. And the grammar of ‘magic’ is used to ascribe cause or intent to that which is not understood. So combining fiction and magic, we get religion. Adding law gets us monotheism. 3 – people can be spoken to in the language of analogy, parable, and fiction, without engaging in lying (religion). We all defend our frames. The abrahamic lies have affected all but the far east. It took me a long time to understand the damage caused by abrahamism (lying). And it’s because people are so vulnerable to that form of lying, that it’s been so dangerous and destructive. Abrahamism combines lying and conflation into not only monotheism but a monopoly frame. This is terribly simple for the human mind. It is also, because it does NOT consist of competition, a PRISON for the human mind. (BTW: Mea Culba: You write very smart things on a regular basis despite jumping a language barrier.)