Theme: Operationalism
-
The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct
The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRight -

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/28161834_10156136631687264_43757840
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/28161834_10156136631687264_437578402228039721_o_10156136631687264.jpg The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRightPaul NunezI like this a lot. I still have a hard time figuring out who originated this scale of hierarchy,though. Almost seems like I’ve heard it from somewhereFeb 17, 2018 9:55pmThe Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRight

Source date (UTC): 2018-02-17 21:41:00 UTC
-
The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct
The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRight -
The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct
The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-17 17:42:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/964917943791480832
-
Actually, I Can’t Be Wrong (About This). Sorry.
(Note: this version is updated to correctly include operations/actions) Information. Decidability. Due Diligence. Testimony. TRUTH 4) Tautology exists (and can only exist) two statements that are identical in informational content for a given precision (context). Meaning closure of the constant relations between states (statements). 3) Truth (Analytic Truth) exists (and can only exist) as a definition of a Truthful statement that is informationally complete (closed). Analytic truths are tautological, with the difference between tautological, and tautology, being deductive necessity. (due to constant relations between states). 2) Truthfulness (Scientific) exists (and can only exist) as warranty that one has performed due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit in one’s testimony in all the dimensions of possible constant relations. 1) Honesty exists (and can only exist) as warranty that one’s testimony is free of deceit – but not free of imagination, ignorance, bias, and error. DIMENSIONS WE CAN PERFORM DUE DILIGENCE AGAINST 1 – categorical consistency (equivalent of point) 2 – internal consistency (equivalent of line) 3 – external correspondence (equivalent shape/object) 4 – operational possibility – (equivalent of change [operations]) 5 – rational choice (volition) – (equivalent of time) 6 – reciprocity (ethics, morality) (equivalent of equilibrium) 7 – limits, parsimony, and full accounting. (equivalent of proof) MATHEMATICAL DEFINITIONS OF DIMENSIONS 1 – point, (identity, or correspondence) 2 – line (unit, quantity, set, or scale defined by relation between points) 3 – area (defined by constant relations) 4 – geometry (existence, defied by existentially possible spatial relations) 5 – change (time (memory), defined by state relations) 6 – pure, constant, relations. (forces (ideas)) 7 – externality (lie groups etc) (external consequences of constant relations) 8 – reality (or totality) (full causal density) GRAMMARS OF CONSTANT RELATIONS (LOGICS) FOR THE DIMENSIONS We can speak in descriptions including (at least): 1 – operational (true) names 2 – mathematics (ratios) 3 – logic (sets) 4 – operations (actions) 4 – physics (action-limiting forces) 5 – Law (reciprocity) 6 – History (memory) 7 – Literature (allegory (possible)) 8 – Literature of pure relations ( impossible ) 8a – Mythology (supernormal allegory) 8b – Moral Literature (philosophy – super rational allegory) 8c – Pseudoscientific Literature (super-scientific / pseudoscience literature) 8c – Religious Literature (conflationary super natural allegory) 8d – Occult Literature (post -rational experiential allegory ) INFORMATION Sets of constant relations between states (all facts must exist within the context of a theory (rules of states). CONSTANT RELATIONS Constant Change and Constant persistence, of Constant relations between states (time). RELATIONS Memory, and mind consists of a hierarchy of neurons that constitute a neural economy, that rewards constant relations, and starves inconstant relations. In other words, given that all testimony depends upon incomplete knowledge (a subset of reality), and that all general rules of arbitrary precision are of necessity incomplete, then testimony and therefore law is flasificationary, logics are falsificationary, not justificationary. Truth exists only as performative via-negativa warranty of due diligence against ignorance, error, bias and deceit. However, a proof constitutes nothing other than possibility (survival from verbal prosecution). Too much for this audience but maybe it will give you ideas. ie: constant relations > logic(internal consistency) > math science(measurement -ratio-consistency) > physics(empiricism) > law(testimony) > economics (resources) > group evolutionary strategy (utility) > Philosophy (choice) You don’t understand. I CAN’T BE WRONG. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute
-
There are Sentimentalists(emotions), Moralists(Norms), Rationalists(Justificatio
There are Sentimentalists(emotions), Moralists(Norms), Rationalists(Justification), Scientists(Correlation), and Operationalists (Truthful Testimony). It is possible to outlaw lies in public, which are possible under all but Operational Speech.) Revolt, Reform. Replace. #Trump.
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-05 16:31:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/960551493337305088
-
The First Secret Of Learning Propertarianism
Operational language in full sentences. All logics consists of some deflationary grammar that limits the structure of phrases, sentences, descriptions, and arguments, as well as the semantics (range of references you can use) to that which is empirical (observable). First, prohibit the use of the verb to-be in all forms. The verb to-be allows you to pretend you understand what you do not. Compose complete, fully-transactional sentences, in the form: —Actor, acts upon X{}, causing changes in states Y{}, and therefore causing these externalities Z{}.— This grammar reinforces the grammar of both economics and ethics: accounting for both the seen and unseen from the action to the totality of the consequences. Operational language prevents loading, framing, and suggestion – and largely deceit by the use of language. (start with reading about e-prime) -
The First Secret Of Learning Propertarianism
Operational language in full sentences. All logics consists of some deflationary grammar that limits the structure of phrases, sentences, descriptions, and arguments, as well as the semantics (range of references you can use) to that which is empirical (observable). First, prohibit the use of the verb to-be in all forms. The verb to-be allows you to pretend you understand what you do not. Compose complete, fully-transactional sentences, in the form: —Actor, acts upon X{}, causing changes in states Y{}, and therefore causing these externalities Z{}.— This grammar reinforces the grammar of both economics and ethics: accounting for both the seen and unseen from the action to the totality of the consequences. Operational language prevents loading, framing, and suggestion – and largely deceit by the use of language. (start with reading about e-prime) -
THE FIRST SECRET OF LEARNING PROPERTARIANISM Operational language in full senten
THE FIRST SECRET OF LEARNING PROPERTARIANISM
Operational language in full sentences. All logics consists of some deflationary grammar that limits the structure of phrases, sentences, descriptions, and arguments, as well as the semantics (range of references you can use) to that which is empirical (observable).
First, prohibit the use of the verb to-be in all forms. The verb to-be allows you to pretend you understand what you do not.
Compose complete, fully-transactional sentences, in the form:
—Actor, acts upon X{}, causing changes in states Y{}, and therefore causing these externalities Z{}.—
This grammar reinforces the grammar of both economics and ethics: accounting for both the seen and unseen from the action to the totality of the consequences.
Operational language prevents loading, framing, and suggestion – and largely deceit by the use of language.
(start with reading about e-prime)
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-28 11:05:00 UTC
-
The Second Secret Of Learning Propertarianism.
For every reference you use, express it as a position in a spectrum of at least three different states all of which share the same measurement (constant relation). The reason most things seem clearer or more insightful is that I use series’ of operational definitions to limit (as do all grammars) and emphasize, the constant relation I wish to illustrate. By describing a spectrum from coming into existence, to dropping from existence (failure) you create a definition wherein the priority of the properties of the category (causality) is not open to conflation or misinterpretation. And that is how Abrahamism causes deception: conflation and redirection (suggestion).