Theme: Measurement

  • Human logical facility consists in the identification of constant, inconstant, a

    Human logical facility consists in the identification of constant, inconstant, and sets thereof, of constant relations between properties of sense perception.

    IOW: the spectrum of colors (frequency) of light.

    Search my site for “constant relations”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 01:31:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198776128875515908

    Reply addressees: @Joseph_EHerrera

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198772577616969730


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198772577616969730

  • If you can’t define the series of constant relations to which the word you’re us

    If you can’t define the series of constant relations to which the word you’re using belongs, you do not understand the word.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-24 19:16:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198681824844812288

  • If you can’t define the series of constant relations to which the word you’re us

    If you can’t define the series of constant relations to which the word you’re using belongs, you do not understand the word.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-24 14:16:00 UTC

  • THE SERIES OF GRAMMARS OF PSYCHOLOGY (important) (read this) —“is there any smal

    THE SERIES OF GRAMMARS OF PSYCHOLOGY

    (important) (read this)

    —“is there any smaller sphere in which you think psychoanalysis is an appropriate method or inquiry? (ie, hopefully the one it is intended for – personal therapy rather than public argumentation).”— Gerard

    I think that it is always better to use this series:

    1. Means: Personality traits and reward systems. (anglo/physical)

    2. Cause: Acquisitionism and Propertarianism.(masculine/objective)

    3. Training: Stoicism (Acquisition of virtues by CBT)

    4. Affect(Heroic): Jungian ( Archetypes as proxies for traits) (german, sympathetic)

    5. Defect:(Victim)Freudian Analysis (feminine conformity) (Jewish feminine)

    This series begins with the most precise but least experiential and moves to the least precise but must experiential.

    Personally I would prefer, that we use the above series just like the series math, physics, chemistry, biology, cooperation (sentience/economics), speech (negotiation), that we all knew the hierarchy of those from the most physical to the most experiential, and as such that we understood how each expresses a more fictional but more experiential grammar as we proceed down that list.

    This series is as important as:

    1. The hierarchy of Measurements (mathematics)

    2. The hierarchy of States of Matter (physical science)

    3. The hierarchy of Grammars (language)

    4. The hierarchy of Knowledge (aristotelian categories)

    (repost)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-24 11:41:00 UTC

  • We (must) negotiate (offer, acquire). We imitate. We habituate negotiating strat

    We (must) negotiate (offer, acquire). We imitate. We habituate negotiating strategies. We negotiate in a market. Markets evolve superior products as std’s weight and measure.
    Economic… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=513294959267399&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-23 13:59:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198239529146167296

  • We (must) negotiate (offer, acquire). We imitate. We habituate negotiating strat

    We (must) negotiate (offer, acquire). We imitate. We habituate negotiating strategies. We negotiate in a market. Markets evolve superior products as std’s weight and measure.
    Economic language is always superior for psychology and sociology because it unifies behavior w physics. https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1198147553948246016

  • (NOTES) CONTEXT Context of this, the Aristotelian(scale) and enlightenment (scal

    (NOTES)

    CONTEXT

    Context of this, the Aristotelian(scale) and enlightenment (scale), and how the work contains the same degree of reformation.

    Because each time we run into the problems of scale – scaling ARISTOCRACY as fast a we scale MARKETS made possible by aristocracy.

    And we have this problem of scale because we don’t know why we have been successful – we just do it.

    So I explain why we were what we did what we do and now you won’t have to just intuit it as moral or not. You can explain it.

    PREFACE FOR CRITICS

    This is an adult conversation about the most important topic of our century. If you need to work to understand it, that’s simply true. John can help you. John and others will teach.

    Do you really understand the declaration, constitution, bill of rights, supreme court rulings, and federal code? or do you morally intuit them. I can test that theory if you’d like and I bet you won’t like the results.

    So try to imagine how stupid you sound when you say you want something simple. There is nothing simple. If it was simple we wouldn’t have had the social conflict of the 20th and 21st century.

    I have the patience for questions. I dont have the patience for the intellectually dishonest, overconfident ignorant or immoral – I work too hard every day to spend time on that.

    SO WHAT DOES A CONSTITUTION NEED TO COVER?

    What is the current problem – we can’t solve it if we can’t define it and most current confusion is over failure to define it.

    Why are we in this condition

    How can we fix this problem.

    What benefits do we gain from fixing the problem.

    What are the costs and consequences of fixing it.

    And… what are the costs if we just go to civil war.

    SECTIONS

    There are roughly four sections.

    1 – The Indictment, is an overall explanation of the success of the european peoples and why we are in this problem today.

    2 – The Law is a technical description of the Natural Law. It’s sort of like learning programming language. Because its very much like one.

    3 – The Prosecution and Crimes

    4 – The Judgement and Enforcement.

    FUTURE ORIENTED GRAND STRATEGY

    (last video)

    CONCEPTUAL DIFFERENCES

    Whereas our original constitution was an experiment in governing under the common natural law, this constitution repairs weaknesses in that constitution, and common law.

    Common law differs from continental law in that….

    We obsess over government, but we this constitution obsesses on law and rule of law. We tend to focus on governments because our laws are weak. when if we have better laws, the method of governing matters far less.

    CORRECT OUR BIGGEST ERRORS

    Repeating the Error of Monarchy MONOPOLY:

    Conflating rule and governance has been one of our three largest errors:

    1) conflating rule and governance

    2) not expanding houses for the classes.

    3) repeating the roman error of the unearned franchise.

    4) majority monopoly rather than market.

    5) Monarchy. Better to think of monarchies as intergenerational custodians. It is clearly better to have intergenerational families make profits or loss from rule (arts and limits) and a rotating middle class for governance (commons).

    PRIMARY DIFFERENCES

    1. The primary improvement in the constitution is to increase the ability of the law to criminalize the saturation of the people with disinformation misinformation and lies in order to profit from manipulating them and fostering conflicts between them for profit. The 20th was largely an era of pseudoscience, lies, sophism and economic and financial innumeracy (a kind of pseudoscience) that created our current crisis.

    2. The second is to restore the constitution to its original intent, and a continuation of the european civilizational project, which is a continental military, judicial, and trade union, as we had in Europe throughout most of our history – even though we don’t think of the church as a weak political judiciary that was largely it’s political function. So a restoration of he constitution to a constitution of the european peoples in the european tradition.

    3. The third is controversial, which is solving the failure of integration the failure of multiculturalism, and the failure of the marxist-feminist-postmodern program to produce other than illusory improvements at the cost of destruction of the family and rates of reproduction. And that is a set of choices – I only recommend a set of them – of escalating unpleasantness. This is where we will find conflict.

    4. The fourth doesn’t really consist of much policy so much as a set of restitutions to compensate for the crimes of the 20th and 21st century, so that we restore our civilization and our families, and the benefits of our ‘third way’ of civilizational order. There won’t be a lot of conflict here. And it’s what most people want from our government anyway.

    OFFEND EVERYONE

    There is something to offend everyone. Your offense is part of the cost of any solution.

    Naming the enemy and the enemies and explaining their strategy in detail is not something I’ve treated gently – just the opposite. And that’s what will start the escalation in both directions.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Introduction – summary of the case

    Declaration – to mirror the original in content

    Preamble – how this modifies the existing constitution

    Article I – Man – Definitions

    Article II – The Law – What it is and how to write it.

    Article III – Rights and Obligations – everyone has under the law

    so notice that the law is before and higher than the state or the government.

    Article IV – The Court

    Article V – The State

    Article V Section I – The State

    Article V Section II – The Military, Regiments, and Militia

    Article V Section III – The Treasury

    Article V Section IV – The Insurer of Last Resort

    Article VI – The Government of the State

    Article VII – The Governments of the Several States

    Article VIII – The People

    Article IX – The Economy

    Article X – The Commons

    Article XI – Commerce and Cooperation

    Article XII – Marriage, Family, Children

    Article XIII – Training: Religion, Fitness, Education, Training,

    Article XIV – The Territories, Monuments, Arts, and Letters

    Article XV – Articles of Devolution

    Article XVI – Restitutions and Punishments

    Addenda

    Threats, Charges, and Duties (“The Black Pages”)

    Letters of Marque

    ====

    PICK YOUR GOVERNMENT

    Think about that question for a moment.

    What protection did our founders intend?

    What protection do we have now?

    What is the ultimate protection that we CAN have?

    Globalism

    or

    Nationalism

    … Ethnocentrism

    … … Homogeneity

    … … … Conformity

    … … … … Subject of Law

    … … … … … individual

    … … … … … or;

    … … … … … individual and collective

    … … … … Subject of Policy

    … … … … … Extended Intergenerational Family

    … … … … … or;

    … … … … … Nuclear Intergenerational Family;

    … … … … … or;

    … … … … … Individual

    … … … … Subject of Polity

    … … … … … Consumption (dysgenia)

    … … … … … or;

    … … … … … Capitalization (eugenia)

    and (Limits)

    Rule by Priesthood (tradition? wisdom?) (Islam)

    … Rule by Justification (Supernatural)

    or

    Rule by Politicians (discretion)(europe)

    … Rule by Discretion (Sophistry)

    or

    Rule of Law (non-discretion)(old-usa)

    …Rule of Law (Technology)

    and Judiciary (Resolution of Disputes)

    … Constitution

    … … Supreme Court

    … … … Courts of Appeals

    … … … … Regional Courts

    … … … … … Specialty Courts

    … … … … … … Professional Judiciary (judges)

    … … … … … … … Professional Officers of Court (law)

    … … … … … … … … Prof.l Property Finance, Banking (title)

    … … … … … … … … … Prof Insurers

    and (Production of Commons)

    Government (Closure: final decision maker)

    … Dictator

    … or

    … Monarchy

    … or

    … President

    … or

    … Prime Minister

    and (selection of commons)

    … … … cabinet

    … … or

    … … … Jury (veto) of appropriations

    … … or (representation)

    … … … Senate-lords

    … … … or

    … … … Parliament and senate-lords

    … … … or

    … … … Lower house(families),

    … … … Middle house(parliament/business), and

    … … … … Upper house (senate-lords/territories)

    … … or (direct participation)

    … … … direct proportional democracy

    … … … or

    … … … direct economic democracy (by who pays)

    and Services (Assets)

    … … Military

    … … … Standing

    … … … … Warfighters

    … … … … Professional Technical

    … … … … Logistics and Supply

    … … … … Medical and Care

    … … … Regiments (Local Part time)

    … … … Reserves( those who have served )

    … … … Militia (every able bodied citizen)

    … … Infrastructure (assets)

    … … Insurer (emergency, disasters, etc)

    … … Treasury

    and Administration (Operations)

    … … … Bureaucracy

    … … … or

    … … … Bureaucracy – Private Partnership

    … … … or

    … … … Competing Private Contractors

    … … … or

    … … … Private Mandatory Public Service

    and Participation (participation)

    … … … … Maximally Earned Franchise

    … … … … Minimally Earned Franchise

    … … … … Citizenship Franchise

    … … … … Resident Franchise

    … … … … Genetic Franchise


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 17:37:00 UTC

  • P-LOGIC 1) Everyone acts to acquire. Life is an expensive means of defeating ent

    P-LOGIC

    1) Everyone acts to acquire. Life is an expensive means of defeating entropy. Acting improves acquisition – at additional cost. Memory improves acquisition – at additional cost. reason improves acquisition – at additional cost. cooperation improves acquisition – at additional cost.

    2) We all act in furtherance of our reproductive strategy. Female (Consume), Neutral(Exchange), and Male (Capitalize)

    3) Male and Female reproductive strategies are in conflict. The female seeks to breed impulsively where it benefits her lineage, and then force the cost of her offspring on the tribe, and to further her offspring regardless of merit. The male seeks to breed impulsively wherever it does not harm his lineage, and to create a tribe capable of resisting conquest by other males – and as such males act meritocratic-ally. Men are political and divided into kin and non-kin – the universe is male. For women, men are marginally indifferent herdsmen of women. Women live in a world of women, and both men and the universe are alien.

    4) Humans compete for status because status provides discounts on opportunities to acquire – especially mates and allies in cooperation. We can identify at least three horizontal axes of class division: biological (reproductive desirability), social (status desirability), economic (wealth desirability) – as well as their undesirable opposites.

    5) There exist only three means of coercing other humans to cooperate with on one means or end vs cooperate with others on different means or ends. These three means of coercion can be used to construct three vertical axes of class specialization: coercion by force(conservatism/masculine), coercion by gossip(progressivism/feminine), coercion by remuneration (libertarianism / neutral masculine). Human elites are formed by those who specialize in one or more of these means of coercion. (gossip: public intellectuals and priests. force: military and political. exchange: voluntary organizations, including the voluntary organization of production.

    6) Language is purely justification negotiation in furtherance of our acquisition by these three means. ergo: All ‘belief’ is justification to the self and others in furtherance of acquisition. It is meaningless. Statements of justification only provide us with information necessary to deduce what it is that we wish to acquire.

    7) Cooperation is a disproportionately more productive means of acquisition than individual production.

    8) We seek discounts on our acquisitions. Some of these discounts are productive and moral and encourage cooperation, and some of them are unproductive and immoral, discourage cooperation, and invite retaliation.

    9) The only moral acquisition is one in which one either homesteads something new or obtains it by productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, where external transfers are limited to the same criteria.

    10) Aristotle’s ‘golden mean’ is an inarticulate primitive expression of the supply-demand curve. All human acquisition takes place within the pressures of supply and demand. As such all explanations of human action must be produced using supply and demand curves: the golden mean.

    11) All human considerations and consequent actions take place in high causal density, choices determined by means of opportunity costs, and any analysis requires we show the choices that an individual or group is considering. (Full Accounting).

    12) We cooperate and coerce in large numbers, as classes with common reproductive interests to using narratives at every scale. Science and moral law are the only means of resolving conflicts between these narratives. Propertarian analysis provides means of amoral analysis, argument and decidability between these loaded, framed, and obscured arguments.

    13) Groups evolve evolutionary strategies and supporting narratives. While none of these strategies by any given group is fully moral, it is still true that we can compare strategies as more and less objectively moral. We can measure the differences in objective morality by the degree of suppression of free riding in that given society.

    14) In all political matters, ultimate decidability is provided by a bias to suicidal, proletarian and dysgenic, or competitive, aristocratic and eugenic reproduction. The myth of equality (the Christian mythos) was let loose by the middle-class takeover of the aristocratic governments, and the eventual enfranchisement of women whose reproductive strategy under industrial production is dysgenic – reversing 7,000 years of indo european genetic pacification (eugenic evolution). This is a very unpleasant and impolitic topic. But it is where we find decidability.

    THE SIMPLE METHOD: INCENTIVES AS ACQUISITION

    1) take any circumstance in which someone is attempting to persuade someone else.

    2) identify the reproductive strategy of the speaker (largely by gender, class, and coercive technique.)

    3) identify the property-in-toto that the speaker is attempting to acquire.

    4) determine if his or her method is advocating a moral transfer(productive) or an immoral transfer (parasitism).

    5) Determine which discounts (thefts) he or she is attempting to engage in, or which premiums (payments) he or she is offering in exchange.

    6) State the user’s request in amoral propertarian terms free of loading, framing, or overloading. In other words, make a purely logical argument free of sentimental loading.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-20 15:41:00 UTC

  • A Secret? If you write proofs in P long enough the insights fall out when writin

    A Secret? If you write proofs in P long enough the insights fall out when writing them. It didn’t occur to me before writing the proof – by looking for three or more points on the line. But after a while you start seeing ‘the lines’ not the ‘points’ and everything fits together. https://twitter.com/Nationalist7346/status/1196952265111875584

  • A Secret? If you write proofs in P long enough the insights fall out when writin

    A Secret? If you write proofs in P long enough the insights fall out when writing them. It didn’t occur to me before writing the proof – by looking for three or more points on the line. But after a while you start seeing ‘the lines’ not the ‘points’ and everything fits together.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-19 20:06:00 UTC