Theme: Measurement

  • I’m just MEASURING CHANGES IN CAPITAL. It’s not an opinion. It’s just what exist

    I’m just MEASURING CHANGES IN CAPITAL. It’s not an opinion. It’s just what exists. There is nothing undecidable by change in capital, any more than change in property, and as such, we see all peoples, all states, in all history operating by this test of reciprocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 18:23:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200480326977572865

    Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200479793294262273


    IN REPLY TO:

    @KillerkattArt

    @curtdoolittle @ArturBooth @DegenRolf You are the one insisting on specific terms and frameworks. Lol. Are there measures of insulation and protection? Yes. Are they self sufficient and unrelated to everything else? No. See, you have a box you’re comfortable playing in, but reality extends way beyond its walls.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200479793294262273

  • Value to others is demonstrable. That’s what the market does. How can I *not* bl

    Value to others is demonstrable. That’s what the market does. How can I *not* blame them?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 17:52:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200472732082802688

    Reply addressees: @ArturBooth @KillerkattArt @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200472514763337729


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ArturBooth

    @curtdoolittle @KillerkattArt @DegenRolf How can you separate blame from yourself to them?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200472514763337729

  • HERE. I”LL MAKE IT WORSE Art can EASILY be evaluated by triangulation (ordinal),

    HERE. I”LL MAKE IT WORSE
    Art can EASILY be evaluated by triangulation (ordinal), as can all things not reducible to linear (cardinal) measures. Anything humans value can be evaluated by triangulation.

    Most of the time, in art, we are measuring ignorance, as in any other field.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 17:26:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200466115144630272

    Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200465449252773888


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @KillerkattArt @DegenRolf HERE IS THE PROBLEM FOR THE ARTIST
    The artist cannot necessarily control his intuitions – the elephant is stronger than the rider, and the elephant gets stronger the lower the individual’s agency (class). But he produces a good in a market, like any other, he can be liable for.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200465449252773888


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @KillerkattArt @DegenRolf HERE IS THE PROBLEM FOR THE ARTIST
    The artist cannot necessarily control his intuitions – the elephant is stronger than the rider, and the elephant gets stronger the lower the individual’s agency (class). But he produces a good in a market, like any other, he can be liable for.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200465449252773888

  • LAW REPLACED PHILOSOPHY Nature consists of constant relations. We can describe t

    LAW REPLACED PHILOSOPHY

    Nature consists of constant relations. We can describe those constant relations. Math is the language of positional relations, logic of set relations, and operations of humanly possible subjectively testable actions. Law consists in the test of the MOST constant relations possible.

    So a) man creates descriptions of physical laws (applications of entropy), and b) man creates descriptions of natural laws (applications of reciprocity), c) judges discover those applications, and d) man issues command, legislation, and regulation, that are rarely if ever ‘law’.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 14:01:00 UTC

  • THE TRUTH ISN’T DESIRABLE IT’S JUST TRUE (DECIDABLE) Nature consists of constant

    THE TRUTH ISN’T DESIRABLE IT’S JUST TRUE (DECIDABLE)

    Nature consists of constant relations. We can describe those constant relations. Math is the language of positional relations, logic of set relations, and operations of humanly possible subjectively testable actions. Law consists in the test of the MOST constant relations possible.

    So a) man creates descriptions of physical laws (applications of entropy), and b) man creates descriptions of natural laws (applications of reciprocity), c) judges discover those applications, and d) man issues command, legislation, and regulation, that is rarely if ever ‘law’.

    So, I mean, I sense your frustration, but Aristotle started the project, Descartes and the British restored it, Darwin advanced it, and I’m completing it: the scientific method is complete. And it’s completed because we have that method for ALL disciplines now, not just physical.

    And I don’t expect you to like it any more than the Semites liked Aristotle, the french and germans liked locke, smith, and Hume, or the Church liked Darwin, Menger, and Nietzsche. No one likes having their crimes (parasitisms) suppressed. We do it anyway. Returns are exceptional.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 13:59:00 UTC

  • “You are the one insisting on specific terms and frameworks. -Lol. Are there mea

    —“You are the one insisting on specific terms and frameworks. -Lol. Are there measures of insulation and protection? Yes. Are they self sufficient and unrelated to everything else? No. See, you have a box you’re comfortable playing in, but reality extends way beyond its walls.”—

    I’m just MEASURING CHANGES IN CAPITAL. It’s not an opinion. It’s just what exists. There is nothing undecidable by change in capital, any more than change in property, and as such, we see all peoples, all states, in all history operating by this test of reciprocity.

    So again, the only reason to DISAGREE is to steal. Humans always and everywhere retaliate at high cost, against theft. I’m just explaining the world. If you don’t like it that isn’t material to me. I don’t do ‘good’ I do ‘true’.

    So the test is not abstractions its cases. If you pick any case i will walk through it and you’ll see you’re engaged in theft and justifying it. Well, then I’ll equally justify your prosecution.

    That’s what I do: law.

    So it doesn’t matter what people think is good or agree is good what matters is that when in dispute science (law) provides decidability.

    Art is decidable as is nearly everything.

    There is no difference between science and law.

    We just like lying and cheating … a lot.

    —“Laws in science are merely pragmatic dependabilities and measurements which are artificially created and imposed by humans. Law in government is always a matter of subjective expression that requires interpretation. Laws only exist because of subjective humans.”—Jason Powell

    @KillerkattArt

    A scientific law is a description (langauge) of constant relations extant in the universe at (so far) increasing degrees of precision (and parsimony).

    There is nothing subjective about ohms law. nothing.

    There is nothing subjective about Reciprocity.

    Nature consists of constant relations. We can describe those constant relations. Math is the language of positional relations, logic of set relations, and operations of humanly possible subjectively testable actions. Law consists in the test of the MOST constant relations possible.

    So a) man creates descriptions of physical laws (applications of entropy), and b) man creates descriptions of natural laws (applications of reciprocity), c) judges discover those applications, and d) man issues command, legislation, and regulation, that are rarely if ever ‘law’.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 13:52:00 UTC

  • PROPERTY IN TOTO (CAPITAL) IS NOT AN OPINION I’m just MEASURING CHANGES IN CAPIT

    PROPERTY IN TOTO (CAPITAL) IS NOT AN OPINION

    I’m just MEASURING CHANGES IN CAPITAL. It’s not an opinion. It’s just what exists. There is nothing undecidable by change in capital, any more than change in property, and as such, we see all peoples, all states, in all history operating by this test of reciprocity.

    So again, the only reason to DISAGREE is to steal. Humans always and everywhere retaliate at high cost, against theft. I’m just explaining the world. If you don’t like it that isn’t material to me. I don’t do ‘good’ I do ‘true’.

    So the test is not abstractions its cases. If you pick any case i will walk through it and you’ll see you’re engaged in theft and justifying it. Well, then I’ll equally justify your prosecution.

    That’s what I do: law.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 13:31:00 UTC

  • Measurement of human, institutional, normative, knowledge capital. Declining in

    Measurement of human, institutional, normative, knowledge capital. Declining in every measure. Why? Dysgenic reproduction peaking behind productivity. Wars always occur in these circumstances. Fiat credit expansion only masks human capital hyper-consumption. I Never Err. Ever.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-28 21:03:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200158338383798272

    Reply addressees: @LitAnscombe @sapinker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1199937468444954625


    IN REPLY TO:

    @LitAnscombe

    @sapinker Why would anybody doubt that the world doing well and in great hands? It’s a real mystery. https://t.co/4bIsSfH0pN

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1199937468444954625

  • Observer, Start, Positional Name: If you name zero (0) “start” and each ‘number’

    Observer, Start, Positional Name: If you name zero (0) “start” and each ‘number’ a positional name then the ‘mystery’ of math rapidly disappears, with the only question being why didn’t we use the right of the decimal rather than the left. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-28 13:52:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200049801854885889

  • Observer, Start, Positional Name: If you name zero (0) “start” and each ‘number’

    Observer, Start, Positional Name: If you name zero (0) “start” and each ‘number’ a positional name then the ‘mystery’ of math rapidly disappears, with the only question being why didn’t we use the right of the decimal rather than the left. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-28 08:52:00 UTC