Theme: Measurement

  • Why are you or your opinions a measure of anything other than what you don’t kno

    Why are you or your opinions a measure of anything other than what you don’t know?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 14:20:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225061661280698369

    Reply addressees: @AutisticArchiv1 @drmiller1960 @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224899825612869632


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224899825612869632

  • “NAXALT arguments fail when the data is accurate and the weight of the distribut

    —“NAXALT arguments fail when the data is accurate and the weight of the distribution is clear. The smaller part of the distribution is already acknowledged but doesn’t falsify the statement that most x ….”—Scott De Warren


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 15:24:00 UTC

  • Notice how you keep throwing out belief and want but not explaining how to opera

    Notice how you keep throwing out belief and want but not explaining how to operational bring about what you’re talking about, Yet I have a hundred thousand words on it.

    (And you apparently don’t know my background either)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 20:42:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224432885211418627

    Reply addressees: @HeadProph @Ozpin_88 @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224432633397960705


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @HeadProph @Ozpin_88 @realDonaldTrump Is this an intellectually honest defense? When did you bring up the quebec analogy? Why do you think without uprising that the opposition will come to the table and settle? Why do you think Quebec wouldn’t have settled without it? Why did the US gov’t cave after 3 wks in 67?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224432633397960705


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @HeadProph @Ozpin_88 @realDonaldTrump Is this an intellectually honest defense? When did you bring up the quebec analogy? Why do you think without uprising that the opposition will come to the table and settle? Why do you think Quebec wouldn’t have settled without it? Why did the US gov’t cave after 3 wks in 67?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224432633397960705

  • Democratic representatives are not accountable in any measurable way other than

    Democratic representatives are not accountable in any measurable way other than to throw out the entire party via cyclical dissatisfied with status quo. P-Law constrains them to truthful reciprocal constitutional speech, requires stated terms, subjects them to legal prosecution.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 15:53:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224360172254105602

  • MOST COMMON LIE IN GENETICS: MORE SIMILAR THAN NOT —“More similar than differe

    MOST COMMON LIE IN GENETICS: MORE SIMILAR THAN NOT

    —“More similar than different can be said about us and chimps”–Göran Dahl

    When discussing genetics “more similar than different’ is a pseudoscientific, and pseudo-mathematical lie. There is even a name for it: “Lewontin’s Fallacy”. Or we can just call it postmodern denialism and igorance. Any of those labels will do.

    Very minor changes appear to have very vast consequences and some groups have accumulated better minor changes and others worse minor changes (genetic load).

    Same is true for rate of calculation of adaption. The rate of adaption depends largely on the number of life forms, the life span, the frequency of generations, the environmental pressures of a given locality, the available means of expressing fitness, the possibility of non local reproduction(travelled); the complexity of the life form(size of the information), the expressed population of the genome, whether it’s RNA(adaptive) or DNA(error checking), asexual or sexual, and the number of points in the replication process that errors can insert, delete, and survive, and some factors we don’t clearly understand yet, that facilitate or inhibit those changes and rates of change.

    DNA(RNA) is a supercomputer that works at chemical rather than electrical velocity.

    There are say, 5m SNP’s (blocks, instructions) and that is not all that can change – in an individuals genome, and 100m active SNPs worldwide.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 12:26:00 UTC

  • P IS EASIER THAN THAT by John Mark It’s way faster/easier to learn to think talk

    P IS EASIER THAN THAT

    by John Mark

    It’s way faster/easier to learn to think talk in “operational language” (and force others to that standard, and to the standard of the 5-pt definition of recipricity) than to go thru a checklist of 2 dozen fallacies. (See my video “Don’t Talk Like a Leftist”.)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 09:09:00 UTC

  • I do not see numbers and rates of propagation that reflect anywhere near the sev

    I do not see numbers and rates of propagation that reflect anywhere near the severity that I would expect from a serious pandemic that would alter the course of china’s history. It’s early yet. But so far unless it mutates (and it can) that doesn’t seem likely.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 03:49:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224178124889513985

    Reply addressees: @QuestionMThings

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224175748652634113


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224175748652634113

  • RUSSIAN LANGUAGE LIKE MANY CANT FULLY TRANSLATE ENGLISH IDEAS (context: how prop

    RUSSIAN LANGUAGE LIKE MANY CANT FULLY TRANSLATE ENGLISH IDEAS

    (context: how propertarianism is difficult to translate because the anglo saxon conversion of family bias to commons bias and common ownership never occurred elsehwere.)

    —“Has Russia always been that way? Or did they have a “golden age” so to speak where either the language was different, the ideas were different, or both?”—Bradley Morgan

    Every language retains embellishments and scars, every literature and culture embellishments and scars, and every people’s self imiage retains embellishments and scars.

    Russia emerged into modernity behind the rest of christendom simply because (a) distance from the core of commerce, (b) missing out on early adaptation to returns on atlantic trade, the renaissance, the british empirical revolution, the reformation, the continental enlightenment, and (c) having the legacy of mongol conquest, and (d) a long history of serfdom – the boyars were far worse than european feudal lords, and nothing close to west germanic (anglo-scandianvian) free men. In other words, they were just more removed from the center of the european restoration after the exit of the semitic dark ages.

    And Russian Literature was and remains the high point of literature in Christendom. And it occurred partly – as did germany – in response to the terrors of france (napoleon’s conquests).

    There was nothing wrong with Russia that the first world war did not create. It had nowhere near the problems of say Italy. And was closest to following the german unification. Germany at the time included most of what we consider Poland. And german influence was across the entire holy roman empire other than France and Spain. Russia had used her new freedoms to replace the mongols and conquer all of Eurasia from the borders of eastern Europe to Canada, and if they hadn’t been stopped (wrongly) by the British they would have retaken Constantinople from the turks and reversed all the costs of the dark ages.

    The problems of Russia, like the problems of germay, liek the present problem in america, is the result of the jewish bolshevik seizure of power in the unstable period at the end of WW1.

    The Russian language is part of the slavic family of languages that is indeed indo european but went through a strange phonetic rotation, which I am not skilled enough to explain but was the result of moving the glottal sounds backward and then due to that cost, losing the soft vowels, leading to counter- intuitive pairs of consonants without interstitial vowels we expect in wester civilization.

    The structure of Russian language (a category iv language – meaning hard to learn) does not require word order organization like english, and still relies on many (many) suffixes that can be overwhelming.

    However, this means there is as great an art in manipulating the russian language to all softs of parallels and suggestions and subtle meanings as there is an art of doing the same with our huge english vocabulary. And much of russian humor is dependent upon those who are cunning with their language in this form.

    It is also very… beautiful … in that it’s still a heroic language, a language of people on the farm, who are dependent upon community, who will suffer anything and survive, and are very proud of their heroism of endurance

    .

    So this is why Russian literature and culture is ‘deep’

    Because it is deep.

    As deep as americans are shallow.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 18:52:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/83762105_197785768286251_15359929147

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/83762105_197785768286251_1535992914797133824_o_197785758286252.jpg THE P-METHODOLOGY WE USE IN RESTORING OUR RULE OF LAW OF SOVEREIGNSTHE P-METHODOLOGY WE USE IN RESTORING OUR RULE OF LAW OF SOVEREIGNS


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 18:18:00 UTC

  • exactly. it is a very precise language, with a huge vocabulary, with german stru

    exactly. it is a very precise language, with a huge vocabulary, with german structure and common prose, french political prose, latin and greek intellectual prose, with scientific and technical, legal and philosophical, and theological and literary nuance to draw from.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 16:01:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223999883515920384

    Reply addressees: @DeguTanya @FloraMaeBaker @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto @BarackObama @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223997429361463296


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223997429361463296