Curt Doolittle

Theme: Measurement

  • 1) Intelligence is definable(ideal), measurable(potential), and demonstrable(exi

    1) Intelligence is definable(ideal), measurable(potential), and demonstrable(existential), and like all cognition mechanical(biological), accidental (idiosyncratic accumulation of experience or knowledge), and deliberate (training). With conscientiousness is just as important. https://t.co/6hMiXOHf9Q

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 18:27:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222224733426671616

    Reply addressees: @Bollemakiesie11 @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222051184338526208

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222051184338526208

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/80887293_193531055378389_74518163750

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/80887293_193531055378389_7451816375078617088_o_193531048711723.jpg “BUT HOW DO YOU DEFINE INTELLIGENCE?”

    Intelligence is:

    (a)definable(ideal),

    (b) measurable(potential), and;

    (c) demonstrable(existential);

    … and like all cognition: mechanical(biological), accidental (idiosyncratic accumulation of experience or knowledge), and deliberate (training).

    With conscientiousness is just as important as intelligence

    Intelligence provides discount on the rate of learning(adapting to) increasing complexity and consciousness duration of tolerance for frustration – and together these defeat time and complexity.

    Wanna be Scared? What do you think Ohm’s Law tells us? Same thing: Dehumanizing.

    I(current) =V(voltage)/R(resistance)

    Intelligence = Information / Resistance

    (See attached)”BUT HOW DO YOU DEFINE INTELLIGENCE?”

    Intelligence is:

    (a)definable(ideal),

    (b) measurable(potential), and;

    (c) demonstrable(existential);

    … and like all cognition: mechanical(biological), accidental (idiosyncratic accumulation of experience or knowledge), and deliberate (training).

    With conscientiousness is just as important as intelligence

    Intelligence provides discount on the rate of learning(adapting to) increasing complexity and consciousness duration of tolerance for frustration – and together these defeat time and complexity.

    Wanna be Scared? What do you think Ohm’s Law tells us? Same thing: Dehumanizing.

    I(current) =V(voltage)/R(resistance)

    Intelligence = Information / Resistance

    (See attached)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 13:37:00 UTC

  • IT”S NOT JUST RECIPROCITY: THE METHOD When you’re testing for reciprocity ask: 1

    IT”S NOT JUST RECIPROCITY: THE METHOD

    When you’re testing for reciprocity ask:

    1 – Is it productive? Do we both have more capital under subjective value after the transfer or not?

    2 – Is it fully informed? Meaning, truthful and complete.

    3 – Is it voluntary a voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests?

    4 – Is it free of imposition of costs by externality on the demonstrated interests of others?

    5 – Is the other party warrantying that it is productive, fully informed, voluntary, and free of externality?

    6 – Is it restitutable if it is warrantied? Meaning is is possible to perform restitution, and is the other party capable of paying restitution?

    For example:

    WHEREAS;

    Party A wants to deny party B the right to bear arms.

    WHERE;

    1. Is it productive? Well no. It’s an attempt to reduce some harm at the cost of enabling another harm, but there is a difference in preference over the choice of bearing those harms.

    2. Is it fully informed? Well no. It’s an attempt to circumvent accounting for the tradeoff in risks, under the pretense that a preference is equal to a truth.

    3. Is it voluntary. Well no, it is involuntary or the question would not arise.

    4. Is it free of imposition of costs by externality on the demonstrated interests of others? Well, no, not limiting the right to bear arms imposes costs (risk) upon those who might be harmed by those with arms, and limiting it imposes costs (risk) upon those who defend self family commons and government from usurpation.

    5. Is it warrantied and warrantable. No. Neither side can warrantee the other.

    6. Is it restitutable. No life is not restitutable wither in defense of rights or in defense of self.

    7. Can an alternate solution be made? Of course. Pay the cost of protecting your interests rather than depriving others of the right to protect their interests.

    THEREFORE

    9. The alternative solution is (a)to have those people who wish to bear the risk of a disarmed public pay for their defense, or (b) for those who wish change to finance and move to a separate geography with different limits.

    This is a cursory treatment but you get the idea.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-26 16:41:00 UTC

  • Not enough data yet, although the rate of transmission is a bit alarming, and I

    Not enough data yet, although the rate of transmission is a bit alarming, and I can’t judge the death rate from so small a sample, but it sure is ‘interesting’.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 01:08:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220875942677139456

    Reply addressees: @EvaB57423389

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220795732254285824

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220795732254285824

  • MATH IS JUST A LANGUAGE WITH A VERY LIMITED VOCABULARY: POSITION AND OPERATION M

    MATH IS JUST A LANGUAGE WITH A VERY LIMITED VOCABULARY: POSITION AND OPERATION

    Math is just a language like every other, consisting of referents (arbitrary categories), nouns (referrers, names of each instance of that category) verbs (operations) and agreement (true/false), but it has only one subject: positional relations, with only one property of its names (position).

    Because of this singularity of content (name: position, action: operation) and scale independence (positional names), this ‘language’ we call mathematics, with which we produce statements (sentences), that we call well-formed (unambiguous), using the ‘grammar’ ( rule of continuous recursive disambiguation) of that language of positional names (math), and then modify (change) by operations (transactions) that preserve the constant relations (ratios), and therefore agreement (truth), we can describe any unambiguous set of constant relations humans can reference.

    As such if we cannot describe a given set of relations with some degree of mathematical precision, by some form of proxy, then we cannot claim to make truth (agreement, agreeable) statements about it.

    (Working on demarcation between pure mathematics and applied mathematics).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 08:50:00 UTC

  • To the person needing glasses in plato’s cave many things look like something be

    To the person needing glasses in plato’s cave many things look like something because they don’t understand.

    Understanding = increase in resolution

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 14:35:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218904793453924352

    Reply addressees: @scprsp @textortexxel @WorMartiN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218904023786409986

    IN REPLY TO:

    @scprsp

    @curtdoolittle @textortexxel @WorMartiN It all looks like a mob delusion trying to force perceptions onto me that I never had – that originated and ended with you and your boyfriend. You know what that means – this looks like some kind of pathological ideology. You nothing who thinks you’re out bitch slapping.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218904023786409986

  • “how do you interpret the original statement with this information?”— We seem

    —“how do you interpret the original statement with this information?”—

    We seem to be more fully material in our thinking, and to achieve decidability only by physical(operational) closure rather than semantic, leading us to falsificationary thought, and continuous invention.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 13:39:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218890760608800770

    Reply addressees: @scprsp @WorMartiN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218758953078640641

    IN REPLY TO:

    @scprsp

    @WorMartiN @curtdoolittle Yes of course – so how do you interpret the original statement with this information?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218758953078640641

  • HUMAN CAPITAL In that branch of economics called Political Economy, Human capita

    HUMAN CAPITAL

    In that branch of economics called Political Economy, Human capital consists of the size of the population, their age distribution, their health, their fitness, their intellect and character, and the sum of training in behavior, skills, and knowledge: every physical emotional and intellectual asset a person can have.

    Human capital is beneficial not just for the individual in achieving his or her full potential but that the economy and the polity achieve their fullest potential together when there is more human capital. This is rather obvious, but it helps to tie the world together for people.

    The government relies on education as the primary means by which to ensure that everyone rather than just those who can afford it, can achieve their potential, and as a consequence the society achieves its greatest potential.

    The reason for mass education was just as much to prevent so many indolent useless criminal malcontents as it was to improve the lives of children. lol.

    We don’t often add that success is more dependent on the average intelligence and personality trait distribution of the group than it is on the education because that would be improper in the context.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 10:05:00 UTC

  • “NAXANED [not all X are not evenly distributed], bigot!”—-James Santagata

    —“NAXANED [not all X are not evenly distributed], bigot!”—-James Santagata

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-16 21:41:00 UTC

  • 2) Mathematical axioms ar declarative, literary consistencies (pseudo-axioms) ar

    2) Mathematical axioms ar declarative, literary consistencies (pseudo-axioms) are declarative, and physical laws are existential and discovered. It doesn’t matter what you define (axioms) it matters only what exists and can be constructed by change (laws).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-16 13:41:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217804011975385088

    Reply addressees: @HliosX @MurraySuggests

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217803289787609088

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @HliosX @MurraySuggests 1) Easily done. Jewish method of deceit by sophism (pilpul). Rothbard’s application of the jewish method of deceit with suggestion. “I define a perfect object as one that has four dimensions” The fact that it’s impossible to construct any object in four dimensions isn’t stated.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217803289787609088

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @HliosX @MurraySuggests 1) Easily done. Jewish method of deceit by sophism (pilpul). Rothbard’s application of the jewish method of deceit with suggestion. “I define a perfect object as one that has four dimensions” The fact that it’s impossible to construct any object in four dimensions isn’t stated.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217803289787609088