(worth repeating)
My job is to reform thought by increasing precision using disambiguation, serialization, operational language. Not to excuse the existing imprecision of thought. That frequently requires re-definition of terms whenever possible, and neologisms as a last resort.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-25 11:04:00 UTC
RT @curtdoolittle: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88 We like P because it consists of measurements independent of emo…
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 11:56:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286631229442359308
RT @curtdoolittle: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88 We like P because it consists of measurements independent of emo…
We like P because it consists of measurements independent of emotional contagion, unlike literature, that must operate by conflation of emotion & action.The German tradition is a logic of secular theology (emotion). The anglo tradition a language of law – meaning science (action)
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 11:50:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286629727617286144
Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286573149455147008
We like P because it consists of measurements independent of emotional contagion, unlike literature, that must operate by conflation of emotion & action.The German tradition is a logic of secular theology (emotion). The anglo tradition a language of law – meaning science (action)
Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88
I like P because it creates, as intended, a universally commensurable, value-neutral vocabulary, grammar, and logic of language, psychology, and social science and provides complete falsification of all human speech. Jung and Hegel are literary(wisdom lit), not science(testable).
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 11:43:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286628126332801025
Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286573149455147008
I like P because it creates, as intended, a universally commensurable, value-neutral vocabulary, grammar, and logic of language, psychology, and social science and provides complete falsification of all human speech. Jung and Hegel are literary(wisdom lit), not science(testable).
Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88
THE MOST DEVELOPED COUNTRY?
—“Q: Which is the most developed country of the world?”—
GREATER GERMANIA (States of the Holy Roman Empire, plus the Nordics.) MEASUREMENT “Developed” requires measurement of the demographic, informational, normative, traditional, institutional, economic, technological question OFFSET by population decline, dysgenia (decline in human capital), immigration of declines in human capital. CAUSES A small homogenous population, with a long history of market and agrarian eugenics, in a reasonably large territory, with few local competitors, needing limited military expenditure, and because of a history of market and agrarian eugenics and therefore possessed of superior demographics, can produce sufficient surplus, to continuously improve human capital (cultural indoctrination, education, training, successful production, research, development), and to produce sufficient commons to maintain those people, and maintain economic competition. WHY GERMANIA? Norway has oil. Switzerland has banking. Even so, Greater Germania is most developed: Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Finland. Why? Emphasis on Quality (Excellence) at all levels of the society; Highest Trust(and justified) in the World; Cultural predisposition to Duty; Cultural predisposition to hierarchy. WHY NOT THE ANGLOSPHERE? Germania is Followed by the anglosphere (UK, CA, NZ, USA, with USA’s higher credit capacity, lower taxes, and higher consumption masking its lack of development. Empires always destroy the home population, and the Anglosphere (British Empire) is paying the cost of empires seeking profits at the expense of the natural population that birthed them. If not for a tiny number of companies Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Microsoft)) is rapidly becoming a 3rd world country because it is only now 1/2 European, and 40% black or Hispanic or ‘other’ third world peoples. USA will be a second if not third world country by 2050, even if it preserves a viable military – and Mexico and mexican-Hispanic peoples will be the dominant majority -effectively reconquering the south and southwest. Why? Women voters. The pill. No-fault divorce, Financialization to defeat the soviets, Jewish sponsorship of immigration, the academic undermining of European civilization to advance their one-world socialism, the export of research, technology and industry to China, import of Hispanic assembly and manual labor and export of assembly labor to Mexico.
THE MOST DEVELOPED COUNTRY?
—“Q: Which is the most developed country of the world?”—
GREATER GERMANIA (States of the Holy Roman Empire, plus the Nordics.) MEASUREMENT “Developed” requires measurement of the demographic, informational, normative, traditional, institutional, economic, technological question OFFSET by population decline, dysgenia (decline in human capital), immigration of declines in human capital. CAUSES A small homogenous population, with a long history of market and agrarian eugenics, in a reasonably large territory, with few local competitors, needing limited military expenditure, and because of a history of market and agrarian eugenics and therefore possessed of superior demographics, can produce sufficient surplus, to continuously improve human capital (cultural indoctrination, education, training, successful production, research, development), and to produce sufficient commons to maintain those people, and maintain economic competition. WHY GERMANIA? Norway has oil. Switzerland has banking. Even so, Greater Germania is most developed: Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Finland. Why? Emphasis on Quality (Excellence) at all levels of the society; Highest Trust(and justified) in the World; Cultural predisposition to Duty; Cultural predisposition to hierarchy. WHY NOT THE ANGLOSPHERE? Germania is Followed by the anglosphere (UK, CA, NZ, USA, with USA’s higher credit capacity, lower taxes, and higher consumption masking its lack of development. Empires always destroy the home population, and the Anglosphere (British Empire) is paying the cost of empires seeking profits at the expense of the natural population that birthed them. If not for a tiny number of companies Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Microsoft)) is rapidly becoming a 3rd world country because it is only now 1/2 European, and 40% black or Hispanic or ‘other’ third world peoples. USA will be a second if not third world country by 2050, even if it preserves a viable military – and Mexico and mexican-Hispanic peoples will be the dominant majority -effectively reconquering the south and southwest. Why? Women voters. The pill. No-fault divorce, Financialization to defeat the soviets, Jewish sponsorship of immigration, the academic undermining of European civilization to advance their one-world socialism, the export of research, technology and industry to China, import of Hispanic assembly and manual labor and export of assembly labor to Mexico.
NO THE CONSTITUTION AND ANGLO LAW RE NOT PHILOSOPHICAL BUT EMPIRICAL
—“What is the significance of a philosophical approach to the constitution?”—
1 – Contrary to popular belief, the constitution is not a philosophical document. 2 – Contrary to popular belief, the common law is not a philosophical discipline. 3 – The natural law of tort (demonstrated interests) is purely empirical (scientific). It’s not philosophical. Philosophers only sought to explain it. We discovered it by adjudicating differences in order to end conflicts and to ‘keep the peace’ meaning ‘cooperation between members of the community’ – in particular to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds). This is why the first laws do not state the law, they only standardize punishments – because the law existed, everyone knew the laws – they’re common sense. But the variation in punishments created retaliation cycles (feuds). A standard punishment demands the community enforce the punishment as ‘settlement of differences’ and ensure both parties against further feuds. 4 – This law is predicated on self-determination, individual sovereignty to achieve it, reciprocity to maintain it, jury and court to decide it, and markets in all aspects of life as a consequence of it. (This is what other civs can’t do – get past familism or tribalism) 5 – The constitution presumes the common law (not positive law), and articulates a market for the production of commons. It’s just another marketplace. 6 – The constitution contains processes for transactional modification of that marketplace. The bill of rights shouldn’t be necessary (and many of the founders didn’t think so) but their failure was to define the common law sufficiently that rights weren’t necessary. 7 – A constitution is a contract that produces a ledger for transactions under the rule of law of natural law of tort. it’s a recipe for running a legal accounting system, for the production of contracts under the natural law of tort. The ‘philosophical’ claims about the constitution are relatively recent attempts to undermine it and end rule of law. It’s the most boring empirical system known by man – which is why no other people in the world have constitutions – only ‘documents of nice words’.