Curt Doolittle

Theme: Measurement

  • No the Constitution and Anglo Law are Not Philosophical but Empirical

    NO THE CONSTITUTION AND ANGLO LAW RE NOT PHILOSOPHICAL BUT EMPIRICAL

    —“What is the significance of a philosophical approach to the constitution?”—

    1 – Contrary to popular belief, the constitution is not a philosophical document. 2 – Contrary to popular belief, the common law is not a philosophical discipline. 3 – The natural law of tort (demonstrated interests) is purely empirical (scientific). It’s not philosophical. Philosophers only sought to explain it. We discovered it by adjudicating differences in order to end conflicts and to ‘keep the peace’ meaning ‘cooperation between members of the community’ – in particular to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds). This is why the first laws do not state the law, they only standardize punishments – because the law existed, everyone knew the laws – they’re common sense. But the variation in punishments created retaliation cycles (feuds). A standard punishment demands the community enforce the punishment as ‘settlement of differences’ and ensure both parties against further feuds. 4 – This law is predicated on self-determination, individual sovereignty to achieve it, reciprocity to maintain it, jury and court to decide it, and markets in all aspects of life as a consequence of it. (This is what other civs can’t do – get past familism or tribalism) 5 – The constitution presumes the common law (not positive law), and articulates a market for the production of commons. It’s just another marketplace. 6 – The constitution contains processes for transactional modification of that marketplace. The bill of rights shouldn’t be necessary (and many of the founders didn’t think so) but their failure was to define the common law sufficiently that rights weren’t necessary. 7 – A constitution is a contract that produces a ledger for transactions under the rule of law of natural law of tort. it’s a recipe for running a legal accounting system, for the production of contracts under the natural law of tort. The ‘philosophical’ claims about the constitution are relatively recent attempts to undermine it and end rule of law. It’s the most boring empirical system known by man – which is why no other people in the world have constitutions – only ‘documents of nice words’.

  • NO THE CONSTITUTION AND ANGLO LAW RE NOT PHILOSOPHICAL BUT EMPIRICAL —“What is

    NO THE CONSTITUTION AND ANGLO LAW RE NOT PHILOSOPHICAL BUT EMPIRICAL

    —“What is the significance of a philosophical approach to the constitution?”—

    1 – Contrary to popular belief, the constitution is not a philosophical document.

    2 – Contrary to popular belief, the common law is not a philosophical discipline.

    3 – The natural law of tort (demonstrated interests) is purely empirical (scientific). It’s not philosophical. Philosophers only sought to explain it. We discovered it by adjudicating differences in order to end conflicts and to ‘keep the peace’ meaning ‘cooperation between members of the community’ – in particular to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds). This is why the first laws do not state the law, they only standardize punishments – because the law existed, everyone knew the laws – they’re common sense. But the variation in punishments created retaliation cycles (feuds). A standard punishment demands the community enforce the punishment as ‘settlement of differences’ and ensure both parties against further feuds.

    4 – This law is predicated on self-determination, individual sovereignty to achieve it, reciprocity to maintain it, jury and court to decide it, and markets in all aspects of life as a consequence of it. (This is what other civs can’t do – get past familism or tribalism)

    5 – The constitution presumes the common law (not positive law), and articulates a market for the production of commons. It’s just another marketplace.

    6 – The constitution contains processes for transactional modification of that marketplace. The bill of rights shouldn’t be necessary (and many of the founders didn’t think so) but their failure was to define the common law sufficiently that rights weren’t necessary.

    7 – A constitution is a contract that produces a ledger for transactions under the rule of law of natural law of tort. it’s a recipe for running a legal accounting system, for the production of contracts under the natural law of tort. The ‘philosophical’ claims about the constitution are relatively recent attempts to undermine it and end rule of law.

    It’s the most boring empirical system known by man – which is why no other people in the world have constitutions – only ‘documents of nice words’.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 12:51:00 UTC

  • THE MOST DEVELOPED COUNTRY? —“Q: Which is the most developed country of the wo

    THE MOST DEVELOPED COUNTRY?

    —“Q: Which is the most developed country of the world?”—

    GREATER GERMANIA

    (States of the Holy Roman Empire, plus the Nordics.)

    MEASUREMENT

    “Developed” requires measurement of the demographic, informational, normative, traditional, institutional, economic, technological question OFFSET by population decline, dysgenia (decline in human capital), immigration of declines in human capital.

    CAUSES

    A small homogenous population, with a long history of market and agrarian eugenics, in a reasonably large territory, with few local competitors, needing limited military expenditure, and because of a history of market and agrarian eugenics and therefore possessed of superior demographics, can produce sufficient surplus, to continuously improve human capital (cultural indoctrination, education, training, successful production, research, development), and to produce sufficient commons to maintain those people, and maintain economic competition.

    WHY GERMANIA?

    Norway has oil. Switzerland has banking. Even so, Greater Germania is most developed: Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Finland. Why? Emphasis on Quality (Excellence) at all levels of the society; Highest Trust(and justified) in the World; Cultural predisposition to Duty; Cultural predisposition to hierarchy.

    WHY NOT THE ANGLOSPHERE?

    Germania is Followed by the anglosphere (UK, CA, NZ, USA, with USA’s higher credit capacity, lower taxes, and higher consumption masking its lack of development. Empires always destroy the home population, and the Anglosphere (British Empire) is paying the cost of empires seeking profits at the expense of the natural population that birthed them.

    If not for a tiny number of companies Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Microsoft)) is rapidly becoming a 3rd world country because it is only now 1/2 European, and 40% black or Hispanic or ‘other’ third world peoples. USA will be a second if not third world country by 2050, even if it preserves a viable military – and Mexico and mexican-Hispanic peoples will be the dominant majority -effectively reconquering the south and southwest.

    Why? Women voters. The pill. No-fault divorce, Financialization to defeat the soviets, Jewish sponsorship of immigration, the academic undermining of European civilization to advance their one-world socialism, the export of research, technology and industry to China, import of Hispanic assembly and manual labor and export of assembly labor to Mexico.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 12:36:00 UTC

  • define “actionable reality”

    —“Can you define “actionable reality” in the following statement? What is actionable reality? : “You eliminate all falsehoods, and what remains is a truth candidate. You eliminate all falsehoods by attempting to falsify each dimension of actionable reality. (Thanks)”–‎Daniel T. Johnson‎

    Actionable = testable. Logically (mental) rationally (incentives) Physical (action) the spirit worlds are not actionable Ideal worlds are not actionable fictional worlds are not actioanble imaginary worlds are not actionable

  • Why Are All Sociologists Leftist (Not Right)

    WHY ARE ALL SOCIOLOGISTS LEFTIST (NOT RIGHT) Sociology is a leftists discipline because it is the Pseudoscience and the center of the replication crisis: the measurement of reported interests (virtue signaling). Right-wing ‘social science’ consists of aristocratic politics, law, and economics: the sciences of measuring demonstrated interests. The Right-wing uses science: Rule of law that produces markets that determine one’s value to others, economics to measure the success at rule of law in producing those markets, policy to supplement those markets – and we don’t deny the fact that natural selection must continue by continuing the western tradition of limiting reproduction to those that can survive and pay for their offspring by service of one another in those markets, with those policies, under that rule of law, measured by economics, and correspondence with, and coherence with, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. Period. The purpose of non-economic ‘social science’ beginning with Boaz, is purely Jewish cosmopolitan universalist, and its Marxist, Neo-Marxist, Postmodernist (second Jewish counter-revolution against truth, reason, science): is to provide pseudo-scientific cover for the Great Lies: The Great Lies of That Deny The Physical, Natural, and Evolutionary Laws 1. The Nature of Man (acquisitive, amoral, kin selective, super-predator), 2. The Variation in Man (Races, classes, sexes, ages, generations), 3. The Malleability of Man (the slate isn’t blank or rewritable), 4. The Inevitability of The Red Queen (preventing regression to the mean – eugneics) 5. The Possibility of Endless Growth (end of scarcity); And therefore: 6. The Myth of Oppression: to claim Europeans are ‘evil’ and ‘oppressors’ for the discovery of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, domesticating themselves and others, so that Europeans nearly single-handedly dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, disease, suffering, and early death. The purpose of the first Jewish-Christian-Islamic counter-revolution against European civilization, and the purpose of the second Jewish Marxist, postmodernist, feminist, political correctness, counter-revolution against European civilization, is constructed by the myth of oppression, rather than domestication, and that the Great Lies are an alternative to the truth: that we must live within the limits of the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws if we wish to prosper and pass thru the great filter; that only Europeans discovered and adapted to them; an that all other civilizations either failed to develop, or stagnated, or fell, because they failed to have the courage to face the truth: the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws are tragic for man.

  • Why Are All Sociologists Leftist (Not Right)

    WHY ARE ALL SOCIOLOGISTS LEFTIST (NOT RIGHT) Sociology is a leftists discipline because it is the Pseudoscience and the center of the replication crisis: the measurement of reported interests (virtue signaling). Right-wing ‘social science’ consists of aristocratic politics, law, and economics: the sciences of measuring demonstrated interests. The Right-wing uses science: Rule of law that produces markets that determine one’s value to others, economics to measure the success at rule of law in producing those markets, policy to supplement those markets – and we don’t deny the fact that natural selection must continue by continuing the western tradition of limiting reproduction to those that can survive and pay for their offspring by service of one another in those markets, with those policies, under that rule of law, measured by economics, and correspondence with, and coherence with, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. Period. The purpose of non-economic ‘social science’ beginning with Boaz, is purely Jewish cosmopolitan universalist, and its Marxist, Neo-Marxist, Postmodernist (second Jewish counter-revolution against truth, reason, science): is to provide pseudo-scientific cover for the Great Lies: The Great Lies of That Deny The Physical, Natural, and Evolutionary Laws 1. The Nature of Man (acquisitive, amoral, kin selective, super-predator), 2. The Variation in Man (Races, classes, sexes, ages, generations), 3. The Malleability of Man (the slate isn’t blank or rewritable), 4. The Inevitability of The Red Queen (preventing regression to the mean – eugneics) 5. The Possibility of Endless Growth (end of scarcity); And therefore: 6. The Myth of Oppression: to claim Europeans are ‘evil’ and ‘oppressors’ for the discovery of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, domesticating themselves and others, so that Europeans nearly single-handedly dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, disease, suffering, and early death. The purpose of the first Jewish-Christian-Islamic counter-revolution against European civilization, and the purpose of the second Jewish Marxist, postmodernist, feminist, political correctness, counter-revolution against European civilization, is constructed by the myth of oppression, rather than domestication, and that the Great Lies are an alternative to the truth: that we must live within the limits of the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws if we wish to prosper and pass thru the great filter; that only Europeans discovered and adapted to them; an that all other civilizations either failed to develop, or stagnated, or fell, because they failed to have the courage to face the truth: the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws are tragic for man.

  • It’s supposed to be palpable because the TRUTH is palpable. 😉 No more lies. No

    It’s supposed to be palpable because the TRUTH is palpable. 😉

    No more lies. No more false promises. Data is data. The more advanced the market, the more global the market the lower the possibility of supporting the underclasses.

    Western civ = Truth before face.
    No more lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-19 17:26:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284902479415607296

    Reply addressees: @aptest_eve @mpigliucci

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284901978716409856

  • It’s supposed to be palpable because the TRUTH is palpable. 😉 No more lies. No

    It’s supposed to be palpable because the TRUTH is palpable. 😉

    No more lies. No more false promises. Data is data. The more advanced the market, the more global the market the lower the possibility of supporting the underclasses.

    Western civ = Truth before face.
    No more lies.

    Reply addressees: @aptest_eve @mpigliucci

  • Oly discord debate I remember is late at night and some idiot looking up definit

    Oly discord debate I remember is late at night and some idiot looking up definitions on google while denying that the human logical facility tests constant relations between states.

    That’s the logical equivalent of saying there are no races, or that all people equal. Denialism.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-19 17:23:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284901783727464449

    Reply addressees: @PunishedWoland @LubitzBol

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284900092990939136

  • Oly discord debate I remember is late at night and some idiot looking up definit

    Oly discord debate I remember is late at night and some idiot looking up definitions on google while denying that the human logical facility tests constant relations between states.

    That’s the logical equivalent of saying there are no races, or that all people equal. Denialism.

    Reply addressees: @PunishedWoland @LubitzBol