THE IMMORALITY OF THE WEST VS OUR INSTITUTIONS OF GOVERNMENT AND LAW
–“Democracy isn’t defined by the West.”–President of Rwanda
Well, that’s largely false. While…
1. Science was invented and defined by the West
2. Natural Law was invented and defined by the West
3. Rule of Law was invented and defined by the West
4. Commonality and Concurrency were invented and defined by the West.
5. Republican government was invented and defined by the West.
6. and Democracy was invented and defined by the West.
BUT…
Those are rules, procedures, and methods of producing the consent of the people, by legitimate governance, through the requirement for concurrency in legislation and voting, commonality in court resolution of disputes, including a market (court) for the prosecution of both the private sector and members of the government, thereby limiting the criminality of the private sector and the corruption of the public sector.
BUT THAT’S JUST A UNIVERSAL ‘HOW’ – NOT A PARTICULAR PEOPLE’S WHAT!!!…
The interest of different peoples in different geographies, with different resources, and different constraints, with different demographic compositions, and different stages of development, with different historical traditions, surrounded by different allies, competitors and enemies create different needs for different moral, ethical, and practical policies and laws to right past wrongs, solve past present and future problems, and bring security comfort and prosperity to the people.
THE WEST IS ONLY POLITICALLY DEVELOPED – NOT MORAL IN POLICY BY ANY MEANS
The West is going through an attempt by the postwar marxist-to-feminist-to-woke movement to undermine the civilization from within. The USA in particular, is at war internally and has been since the 1950s with the movement of postwar Marxists into the country, where they set out to use our racial conflict as a means of division. Then they converted to using women. Then to immigrants. They are trying to create the problems rampant in less developed countries in the west so that they can be ruled by corrupt, parasitic, privileged elites that the rest of the world so desperately wants to escape from.
So, the world should ignore all american and European ‘values’ that are obviously immoral and harmful and instead focus on the Anglo invention of the technologies used by our institutions that have made the people wealthy and safe: rule of law by the natural law of individual sovereignty and universal demand for reciprocity.
The USA had a mission at the end of the world wars: to end the age of empires and prevent another world war, by the use of US temporary industrial technological economic, institutional, and military superiority to create free trade, prohibit empires, promote nation states, limit governments to the improvement of the condition of their people (human rights), and prohibit the breaking of borders (aggressions).
This strategy was imperfectly executed, of course. But the result was that mankind for the first time in human history was largely raised out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, and early death. And the truth is people still hate the west for our many flaws in doing it, rather than the miracle that we managed to do it at all.
That said, and the macro level, Americans sought a moral ambition for the world.
But, domestically? Americans watched TV and played video games while the enemy with in set about the destruction of our culture, our history, our schools, our universities, our institutions, our religion, and worst of all – our families and our morals.
How moral is a civilization (anglo or European), any country in it, any people, so morally weak, decadent, and corrupt that they allow sedition and treason from within? Are Americans cowards? Lazy? Incompetent? Stupid? Ignorant? Foolishly optimistic?
In everything: take the West’s technology.
Government is a technology like any other.
That’s all.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation