Theme: Institution

  • Yes but there are a lot of these images with the old org name

    Yes but there are a lot of these images with the old org name


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-30 11:58:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696854954764378149

    Reply addressees: @aldafa_ir

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696834875561845210

  • “Every system, organizational, procedural, pedagogical, or technological, calcif

    -“Every system, organizational, procedural, pedagogical, or technological, calcifies, and the ‘riders’ consume the host over time.”-


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-30 05:15:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696753522727866566

  • You very clearly don’t have the vaguest idea what you’re talking about. There wa

    You very clearly don’t have the vaguest idea what you’re talking about. There was no alternative. All of modernity was built on innovations in accounting, rule of law,and the enforceability of. Contract and instrument under law. Interest is the reward for saving so that others…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-29 20:36:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696622829137969628

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696571778007527455

  • He and his cadre of mouth breathing losers did a number on our organization. The

    He and his cadre of mouth breathing losers did a number on our organization. The quicker he disappears the better.

    PS: Don’t blame Richard. He made an honest effort. It didn’t work, but at least he tried. Too many losers self-medicate with criticism of those better than them who…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-29 20:20:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696618883132641443

    Reply addressees: @MHughesLA @2020Blackstone @RichardBSpencer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696616887642362061

  • UNDERSTANDING THE 20TH CENTURY POLITICAL EXPERIMENTS (Law, Socialism, Maxism, Le

    UNDERSTANDING THE 20TH CENTURY POLITICAL EXPERIMENTS (Law, Socialism, Maxism, Leninism, Fascism)

    All,
    When we discuss the evolution of experiments with organizing humans in modernity, we would be better off discussing the specific approaches used and the influences that caused them to make the PRACTICAL decisions each country and group made.

    The English invention of the empirical rule of law modern state, and it’s commercial rather than religious, social, or political organization, and the equality of opportunity, given the higher trust of the english people and the maturity of their institutions, as a continuation of the domeestic practice of the englis as they expanded in the age of sail. And the american order is simply a textual formalization of the english order.
    (‘A Legal Order’)

    The French Socialist philosophical invention of the origional meaning of socialism, meaning the organization of the administrative state for the benefit of the people rather than the aristocracy nobility and burghers, and the mediation of inequality of outcome, given the lower trust of the french people, their greater heterogeneity, with france being the most politically backward state in europe – and as a european reformationary movement.
    (‘A Bureaucratic Order’)

    The Marxist pseudoscientific distortion of socialism to the centralized state control of production and the equality of outcome, given the zero trust of the jews and underclasses, the total absence of experience with governance or rule, in fact the long history of jewis incompetence at rule, and even their inability to subsist non-parasitically with host populations, and especially total lack of exeperience with the behavior of human beings at scale – as an international revolutionary movement.
    (a ‘Social Order’)

    The Leninist ideological distortion of french -> marxist socialism given the zero trust of the jews and lower classes, the total inexperence of with governance and rule, the primitive agrarian state of development, and the acknowledgement of the demonstrated behavior of people at scale.
    (a ‘Military Order’)

    The Fascist ideological counter-revolution against the English Legal, French ‘Liberal’, and Jewish Marxist, and Russian Leninist alternatives. Given the high trust and sense of duty and piety of the german people given that they were surrounded, that france had destroyed the holy roman empire,
    (a ‘Pseudo-Monarchical Order’)

    Tip: The English were right on the seas where they were dominant and secure. The Fascists were right on the continent where they were surrounded and insecure. Everyone else was wrong. Because socialism, marxism, leninism, maoism, the jews, and the laggarts we call the muslim fundamentalists were all wrong.

    Why? every polity doubles down on it’s group strategy like a drug addict until they crash hard enough that they need to reform.

    Europeans are misunderstood: we crashed and reformed often and quickly and in doing so, despite being the youngest race, the young civilization, with small numbers, at the edge of the bronze age revolution, by the accident of the only possible means of organizing clans of steppe herders competing with horse, bronze, and wheel: rule of law and democratic choice.

    In other words, the government of cattle raiders, of marines(rome), of vikings, of pirates, and of diasporic naval conquerors, whether land or sea, is the origion of sovereignty, the origin participatory government, the origin of rule of law, the origin of contractual legislation, and subsequently the origion of reason, philosophy, natural philosophy, empiricism, and science, and the fact that in just three short periods in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, europeans almost excluslively, and faster than all other civilizations combined, dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the victimization by a nature hostile to our existence.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @MadsMikkel28560 @Viorp2 @Thedukeistheman @AntonyArakkal1 @Sargon_of_Akkad


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-29 16:32:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696561361147383810

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696551574888222988

  • (NLI Thanks) All; We’ve seen quite a few people return to participation in the d

    (NLI Thanks)
    All;
    We’ve seen quite a few people return to participation in the discourse on Twitter over the past few months. Some of whom have been with us for years. And including a number of people with non-trivial expertise in our work.

    I just want to say, with deepest appreciation, that together you are making a bright future for not only our people but for all people, by taking the risk to put in the effort to learn such a complex discipline at this early stage of our development.

    I love and appreciate all of you. Thank you for all you do.

    -CD


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-28 22:23:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696287412282884096

  • Martin is a Fellow in our organization, The Natural Law Institute – and the most

    Martin is a Fellow in our organization, The Natural Law Institute – and the most conservative member we have. Most of us are classical liberals to conservative libertarians. But Martin is from Eastern Europe and because of their history, they are less optimistic about human nature given their experience with both the Nazis and the Soviets – and even the Americans. So while he is soft spoken, he has a rather dry and acerbic wit, and the most demanding of clarity in our work.

    Reply addressees: @RobertNewmanUSA


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-28 16:21:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696196328194293760

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696190050638102932

  • Q: Curt: “What are the criteria necessary for Fiat Currency?”– Fiat, in latin m

    –Q: Curt: “What are the criteria necessary for Fiat Currency?”–

    Fiat, in latin meaning “It shall be” requires five properties:
    1) Unbacked by a commodity,
    2) Value maintained only by supply and demand
    3) Issued by an arbitrary actor (government)
    4) Insured by that actor (government),
    5) and Mandated acceptance by the issuer (government) for use in the settlement of exchanges.

    This means only those organizations capable of coercing its use (“thou shalt”) can issue a ‘fiat’ currency(commodity money substitute). And in practical terms, only governments are capable of producing and mandating fiat currency.

    So privately issued digital is not a fiat currency. It’s a divisible, share in the network, for use as a token money, meaning as a money-substitute.

    Fedcoins will likely be fiat money substitutes. If not at first then over time.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-28 14:09:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696163125030993920

  • CORRECTION: every government is eventually captured by a clerisy whether religio

    CORRECTION: every government is eventually captured by a clerisy whether religious, ideological or credentialed. Intel is just one of the factions.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-25 19:10:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1695151673570680952

    Reply addressees: @ScottAdamsSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1695149617409819058

  • Correct. Most people are bots, participating in a “open conspiracy of common int

    Correct. Most people are bots, participating in a “open conspiracy of common interest (public)” and not a “closed conspiracy of intent (secret)”, or open conspiracies of intent (not secret).
    However there are conspiracies such as the intentional conspiracy to “March through and destroy the institutions of cultural production of western civilization and its demand for individual responsibility” and the resulting spread of that open conspiracy of intent into “open conspiracies of common interest”.

    Reply addressees: @bryanbrey @AshaLogos


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-23 20:29:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694446698578210816

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694445550098096192