Theme: Institution

  • “Hong Kong is an example of exogenously derived AND implemented institutions app

    —“Hong Kong is an example of exogenously derived AND implemented institutions applied to a high-IQ population. This is the recipe for Hong Kong’s success.”—Aaron Kahland


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-06 07:44:00 UTC

  • “Hong Kong is what happens when white westerners create an independent city with

    —“Hong Kong is what happens when white westerners create an independent city with minimal government. It just happens to be in Asia. (We need more micro states in the west.)”—Noah J Revoy


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-05 19:32:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1004083459852292101

  • “Hong Kong is what happens when white westerners create an independent city with

    —“Hong Kong is what happens when white westerners create an independent city with minimal government. It just happens to be in Asia. (We need more micro states in the west.)”—Noah J Revoy

    —“

    Hong Kong, the “city with minimal government”:

    1. near state monopoly over land, with rents to the state

    2. extensive social welfare and free health care

    3. public housing with rent controls

    4. regulated transport services as public utilities

    “—Lord Keynes

    Correct. National Socialism.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-05 15:31:00 UTC

  • IMPROVEMENT IN CHINESE QUALITY (can they replicate the high trust japanese?)

    https://www.qualitydigest.com/inside/management-article/made-china-scary-bad-scary-good-052918.htmlhttps://www.qualitydigest.com/inside/management-article/made-china-scary-bad-scary-good-052918.htmlINCREMENTAL IMPROVEMENT IN CHINESE QUALITY

    (can they replicate the high trust japanese?)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 19:23:00 UTC

  • IMPROVEMENT IN CHINESE QUALITY (can they replicate the high trust japanese?)

    https://www.qualitydigest.com/inside/management-article/made-china-scary-bad-scary-good-052918.htmlINCREMENTAL IMPROVEMENT IN CHINESE QUALITY

    (can they replicate the high trust japanese?)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 19:23:00 UTC

  • WHY CHINA NEEDS SOCIAL CREDIT: LOW TRUST

    http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2018/05/10/china-defends-orwellian-social-credit-system/http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2018/05/10/china-defends-orwellian-social-credit-system/UNDERSTANDING WHY CHINA NEEDS SOCIAL CREDIT: LOW TRUST


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 19:21:00 UTC

  • WHY CHINA NEEDS SOCIAL CREDIT: LOW TRUST

    http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2018/05/10/china-defends-orwellian-social-credit-system/UNDERSTANDING WHY CHINA NEEDS SOCIAL CREDIT: LOW TRUST


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 19:21:00 UTC

  • Any description of any political system must include a population model, an econ

    Any description of any political system must include a population model, an economic model, a commons producing model. If you can’t state all three of those, then you aren’t stating anything that makes any sense at all.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 13:38:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1003632024068984832

  • by Richard Nikoley The law is the law. It has to be that way because we can’t co

    by Richard Nikoley

    The law is the law. It has to be that way because we can’t conceive of every possible circumstance, nor the myriad contexts in which circumstances occur.

    This is the whole point of a jury. The purpose of a jury is to judge the law as applied to the facts, circumstances, and context of the prosecution of the law in question against a defendant.

    A jury is effectively an addendum to the 2nd Amendment, which is the whole Constitution and Plan B.

    Having 12 people agree to nullify any law is a super peace-sustaining power.

    Use it. Jury Nullification. Google it, study it, know it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-03 11:50:00 UTC

  • A Parasitic Priest Class

    by Neil A. Bucklew The problem with abrahamism is its murky interpretable nature that allows a parasitic priest class to form. There are good ideas within christianity along side bad ones, as well as a lot of unnecessary fiction. the family structure of the west is not laid out in the bible, where semitic polygamy is still written. western “christian tradition”, is not wholly guided by the bible, but mixed with unspoken elements of western society. I do not see how you can look at Rome and its pagan culture or other pagans and see a feminized culture. They had the same basic monogamous culture with some variation on details. women and men had clear and specific duties more than loose rules of thumb such as “love your wife respect your husband”. To say Christianiy rescued Europe from the chaos of pagan matriarchy is quite a stretch. It would be more accurate to say that patriarchal people used and transformed christianity in their struggles for dominance. There is a huge amount of western behavior during christian times that cannot be explained by any christian teachings or what is written en the bible. the foundations of what is called the christian work ethic are hardly to be seen in the bible, which teaches that work is the result of a curse we must suffer through. the foundations of that work ethic is in the biology and pre christian culture. the “incremental suppresion” that curt talks about especially during the manorial period, was quite often about NOT helping those who would not work and participate and letting them die. no need to kill them, just let nature take its course. christian charity consistently undermines this.