Curt Doolittle

Theme: Institution

  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION CONSIST OF THE CULT OF THE LAW. EVERYTHING ELSE IS EDUCATIO

    WESTERN CIVILIZATION CONSIST OF THE CULT OF THE LAW. EVERYTHING ELSE IS EDUCATION.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-17 12:41:00 UTC

  • LAW AND THE LIMITS TO WISDOM LITERATURE (CULTS) —“I’m concerned that you are u

    LAW AND THE LIMITS TO WISDOM LITERATURE (CULTS)

    —“I’m concerned that you are unwilling to allow anything outside of your materialist paradigm Curt.”— Claire Rae Randall

    No, I am limiting the imaginary (Fictions) to the non-harmful. 😉

    I write about the science and LAW of religion. What religions emerge from the science and consequential LAW is not something that terribly much bothers me.

    It just can’t be as destructive as the abrahamic religions, or as limiting as the hindu or buddhist, but must do the opposite: provide ability to act, rather than escape.

    Stoicism + Mythology + Literature + History will work.

    I WRITE SCIENCE OF LAW (TRUTH). It is a via-negativa. A set of LIMITS. WHat people do within those limits is simply another market for productive, fully informed (truthful), warrantied, voluntary exchange, absent imposition upon the accumulated intersets of others by externality.

    That which is OUTSIDE of the law violates one of those tests.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-17 11:32:00 UTC

  • TO ELDERS OF THE BLACK SUN 3 : POSSIBLE ORDERS OK, so you are producing sufficie

    TO ELDERS OF THE BLACK SUN 3 : POSSIBLE ORDERS

    OK, so you are producing sufficient depth of thought so that if you work at it enough you can produce a canon.

    Organizational charts (prescriptions) are open to implementation the way simple sentimental resonance (Evola) is not.

    However, all civilizations are organized by law (or more precisely, rules). Islam is ‘easy’ because the rules are so complete, and an imbecile can memorize the myth, and principles through repetition. Christianity was imposed by coercion (literacy), as a market competition between church (nobility) and military (aristocracy). Judaism is used to preserve separatism. Hindu ‘law’ is limited but the mythos vast. Buddhism always and everywhere coexists with a martial or bureaucratic state. Hinduism and Shintoism do not need so much ‘authority’ because of genetic and cultural homogeneity. Christianity was germanicized for the same reason. Orthodoxy and islam exist across less developed (market) peoples (orthodoxy), and islam across both less developed and tribal peoples (constant hostility).

    We do not succeed with ideal religions. We succeed with religions that solve a problem. What religion will solve the problem of modernity AND ethnocentrism, since ethnocentrism is the optimum organizing method as long as it’s not regressive. Jews survived by parasitism on existing civilizations through profit from moral hazard, accumulating capital, and then using it for more moral hazard, until they were cast out. During that entire time they contributed nothing to humanity (competitiveness) until converted to aristotelianism.

    In general, either (a) produce a fiction that people want to run to for economic or political reasons (marxism, postmodernism, feminism); (b) produce an economic order that people want to run to for economic reasons; (c) Produce a Myth of Conquest by which a small group of men can take advantage of a weakness in a current order; (d) produce an improvement in a mythos over a homogenous polity that provides greater explanatory power, and greater utility, and greater methods of cooperation in new (current) conditions.

    There are only three possible incentives in the production of order:

    Law/Violence, Commerce/Wealth, Cult/Cooperation

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-17 09:46:00 UTC

  • Can’t. Looked into it. Australian regulation is hostile to business

    Can’t. Looked into it. Australian regulation is hostile to business.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-14 14:14:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1051476375356477441

    Reply addressees: @AprioriTraditi1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1051450332088217600

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1051450332088217600

  • The history of Southeast Asia, or perhaps more accurately the quasi-history of S

    —–The history of Southeast Asia, or perhaps more accurately the quasi-history of Southeast Asia since so many of the records are from China and elsewhere, indicates strong Indian influence in the period before 1000 AD. The standard model is that this is cultural diffusion. And by and large Southeast Asian peoples are are mostly indigenous. But, a non-trivial minority of their ancestry is recent, but pre-colonial, gene flow from the Indian subcontinent. Additionally, the imprint is easier to see in the Y chromosome than the mtDNA. The legends of marriages between Indian Brahmins and native princesses in places like Cambodia probably do reflect something real in the dynamics of the early Indianization.—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-14 02:37:00 UTC

  • Religions need a framework that contain the basics

    October 13th, 2018 10:13 AM

    —“Do you see a new religion being built through the deliberate design of one or a few people, or something that evolves more organically? I think you’re right in that we have all the pieces (Stoicism, Ancestors, Archetypes etc) they just need to be laundered of any “nonsense” and developed into something that holds together that people can use. I see it as something that would have to evolve over time through a distributed effort, and of course be limited by the criteria of what not to do (via negitiva), if that makes sense.”— Andy Lunn

    [R]eligions need a framework that contain the basics, and ‘communicators’ reform the message (narratives) over time.

  • Religions need a framework that contain the basics

    October 13th, 2018 10:13 AM

    —“Do you see a new religion being built through the deliberate design of one or a few people, or something that evolves more organically? I think you’re right in that we have all the pieces (Stoicism, Ancestors, Archetypes etc) they just need to be laundered of any “nonsense” and developed into something that holds together that people can use. I see it as something that would have to evolve over time through a distributed effort, and of course be limited by the criteria of what not to do (via negitiva), if that makes sense.”— Andy Lunn

    [R]eligions need a framework that contain the basics, and ‘communicators’ reform the message (narratives) over time.

  • A Brotherhood of Upgrades

    October 13th, 2018 10:16 AM A BROTHERHOOD OF UPGRADES by Tom McSweeny [R]estore the brotherhoods (tribal), restore the militia (local), restore the think tanks (national), restore the monarchies (international). Brotherhood of upgrades – look what has been achieved in the last few years here, the quality of community and info that has been discovered, presented and discussed. We’ve put in hours to digest, debate, contribute to varying (and increasingly, hopefully) degrees. We’ve come a long way. It’s great to see in myself and others how we’ve changed over the years, in our worldviews coming more in line with reality as is (Curt), debunking practices (Bill…first came across you with the takedown of meditation) in the quality of our arguments (James slaying it), and now to see the effects go further as it spreads (watch the world turn once the book is out and the advocates increase (thanks to the back and forth training on the likes of fb) worldwide. (And i’d encourage any who don’t pitch in to do so….the learning is in the back and forth for us all). Militia – you’ve nailed this as far as I’m concerned. Decentralised, reciprocal insurance of property. A living network exchanging info and protection to self similar. Think tanks / courtiers – though now seemingly corrupted and not spending their time working out the best way for the nation and it’s people… A pretty good investment for a nation if they could be returned to that. Get the synthesizers and measurers pushing policy based on data rather than feels. Lot of big questions to face that are simply going to escalate through time (e.g. highly reproductive invasive demographics in democracies) which require answers and action. Monarchies – practical, judge of last resort, easier to make deals with fewer decision makers involved. Hierarchy. The brotherhood nourishes the militia, nourishes the think tanks, nourishes the monarchy. For best results, all in that hierarchy are invested intergenerationally with skin in the game through time. Fail in that, with undue influence at any level by those without investment, we get mess and dysgenia. The importance of getting this right cannot be ignored. At all. Not even a little bit. Love you guys.

  • A Brotherhood of Upgrades

    October 13th, 2018 10:16 AM A BROTHERHOOD OF UPGRADES by Tom McSweeny [R]estore the brotherhoods (tribal), restore the militia (local), restore the think tanks (national), restore the monarchies (international). Brotherhood of upgrades – look what has been achieved in the last few years here, the quality of community and info that has been discovered, presented and discussed. We’ve put in hours to digest, debate, contribute to varying (and increasingly, hopefully) degrees. We’ve come a long way. It’s great to see in myself and others how we’ve changed over the years, in our worldviews coming more in line with reality as is (Curt), debunking practices (Bill…first came across you with the takedown of meditation) in the quality of our arguments (James slaying it), and now to see the effects go further as it spreads (watch the world turn once the book is out and the advocates increase (thanks to the back and forth training on the likes of fb) worldwide. (And i’d encourage any who don’t pitch in to do so….the learning is in the back and forth for us all). Militia – you’ve nailed this as far as I’m concerned. Decentralised, reciprocal insurance of property. A living network exchanging info and protection to self similar. Think tanks / courtiers – though now seemingly corrupted and not spending their time working out the best way for the nation and it’s people… A pretty good investment for a nation if they could be returned to that. Get the synthesizers and measurers pushing policy based on data rather than feels. Lot of big questions to face that are simply going to escalate through time (e.g. highly reproductive invasive demographics in democracies) which require answers and action. Monarchies – practical, judge of last resort, easier to make deals with fewer decision makers involved. Hierarchy. The brotherhood nourishes the militia, nourishes the think tanks, nourishes the monarchy. For best results, all in that hierarchy are invested intergenerationally with skin in the game through time. Fail in that, with undue influence at any level by those without investment, we get mess and dysgenia. The importance of getting this right cannot be ignored. At all. Not even a little bit. Love you guys.

  • A BROTHERHOOD OF UPGRADES by Tom McSweeny Restore the brotherhoods (tribal), res

    A BROTHERHOOD OF UPGRADES

    by Tom McSweeny

    Restore the brotherhoods (tribal), restore the militia (local), restore the think tanks (national), restore the monarchies (international).

    Brotherhood of upgrades – look what has been achieved in the last few years here, the quality of community and info that has been discovered, presented and discussed. We’ve put in hours to digest, debate, contribute to varying (and increasingly, hopefully) degrees. We’ve come a long way. It’s great to see in myself and others how we’ve changed over the years, in our worldviews coming more in line with reality as is (Curt), debunking practices (Bill…first came across you with the takedown of meditation) in the quality of our arguments (James slaying it), and now to see the effects go further as it spreads (watch the world turn once the book is out and the advocates increase (thanks to the back and forth training on the likes of fb) worldwide. (And i’d encourage any who don’t pitch in to do so….the learning is in the back and forth for us all).

    Militia – you’ve nailed this as far as I’m concerned. Decentralised, reciprocal insurance of property. A living network exchanging info and protection to self similar.

    Think tanks / courtiers – though now seemingly corrupted and not spending their time working out the best way for the nation and it’s people… A pretty good investment for a nation if they could be returned to that. Get the synthesizers and measurers pushing policy based on data rather than feels. Lot of big questions to face that are simply going to escalate through time (e.g. highly reproductive invasive demographics in democracies) which require answers and action.

    Monarchies – practical, judge of last resort, easier to make deals with fewer decision makers involved.

    Hierarchy. The brotherhood nourishes the militia, nourishes the think tanks, nourishes the monarchy. For best results, all in that hierarchy are invested intergenerationally with skin in the game through time. Fail in that, with undue influence at any level by those without investment, we get mess and dysgenia.

    The importance of getting this right cannot be ignored. At all. Not even a little bit.

    Love you guys.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 10:16:00 UTC