Curt Doolittle

Theme: Institution

  • ( I mean, by and large my life’s work is devoted to ending the kind of sophism y

    ( I mean, by and large my life’s work is devoted to ending the kind of sophism you just stated, and criminalizing it as toxic pollution of the informational commons, and the institutions of cooperation that depend upon it. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-19 00:15:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053077104483598336

    Reply addressees: @anEthanClark

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053070035709820929

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053070035709820929

  • STATE CAPITALISM = NATIONAL SOCIALISM There is no difference between NSDAP germa

    STATE CAPITALISM = NATIONAL SOCIALISM

    There is no difference between NSDAP germany and CENTRAL PARTY china other than the scale of the bureaucracy necessary to administer a more rapid modernization (in china) and a rapid resistance to communism (in germany).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 16:50:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052965032206761992

  • STATE CAPITALISM = NATIONAL SOCIALISM There is no difference between NSDAP germa

    STATE CAPITALISM = NATIONAL SOCIALISM

    There is no difference between NSDAP germany and CENTRAL PARTY china other than the scale of the bureaucracy necessary to administer a more rapid modernization (in china) and a rapid resistance to communism (in germany).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 12:49:00 UTC

  • “The Democrats have spent the last 50 years trying to replace husbands and fathe

    —“The Democrats have spent the last 50 years trying to replace husbands and fathers with government programs.”—Eric Blankenburg

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 10:05:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052863113543016448

  • “The Democrats have spent the last 50 years trying to replace husbands and fathe

    —“The Democrats have spent the last 50 years trying to replace husbands and fathers with government programs.”—Eric Blankenburg

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 06:04:00 UTC

  • THE DEFINITION OF PROLETARIAT IN ROMAN LAW by Igor Rogov People not belonging to

    THE DEFINITION OF PROLETARIAT IN ROMAN LAW

    by Igor Rogov

    People not belonging to any particular family, and having no name nor any stakes in upholding the ancestral honor: Which is literally “proletariat”, as defined by the Roman law and culture.

    The difference between Rome and the Present, is that the current proletarian crop has all the voting power to be manipulated, so the collapse of the empire does not even need any external barbarian invasion anymore.

    (Let’s repeat that. The “Invasion from within”.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-17 22:53:00 UTC

  • #Facebook The reason Mark will lose his role as Chairman (eventually) is because

    #Facebook The reason Mark will lose his role as Chairman (eventually) is because he has a resistance to transparency and truth – and always has had. Something which is advantageous in entrepreneurship and disadvantageous in stewardship of capital, norms, and laws.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-17 21:25:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052671893466169348

  • Curt: What About Caste Cultures?

    October 17th, 2018 12:39 PM CURT: WHAT ABOUT CASTE CULTURES?

    —“Genuine question: wasn’t that the upside to caste in traditional cultures?”— Jim Yankowsky

    [S]ocial orders with Casts prevent people from feeling left behind or of lower status (left out or discarded by the herd) As long as (as in the hindu model, or the western model, or the chinese model) rotation is possible by achievement, absolutely nothing. The west had wild animal (barbarian), slave, serf, freeman, citizen, nobility, aristocracy under agrarianism. At present we have about the same hierarchy but military, commercial, and intellectual are in competition for the body politic (labor and women). SO the hierarchy goes in three directions, rather than one. And the three directions compete (gossip/talk, commerce/trade, law/force). At present the court mediates the market between the directions. The difference with castes is that you are justifying someone’s status by the beneficial function that they serve in society ,a nd preserving defense against outbreeding (downbreeding), and all sorts of ‘democracy’ and its religious equivalents. There is nothing bad about hindu religion at all other than the fact that they are weak, and lack sufficient middle class to produce courts free of familial corruption. I don’t like the silly mystical stuff. But that aside it’s a good system. Islam is the worst of all possible worlds. Equalitarian ignorance with mandated hostile aggression to perform consumption on the capital of other civilizations.

  • Curt: What About Caste Cultures?

    October 17th, 2018 12:39 PM CURT: WHAT ABOUT CASTE CULTURES?

    —“Genuine question: wasn’t that the upside to caste in traditional cultures?”— Jim Yankowsky

    [S]ocial orders with Casts prevent people from feeling left behind or of lower status (left out or discarded by the herd) As long as (as in the hindu model, or the western model, or the chinese model) rotation is possible by achievement, absolutely nothing. The west had wild animal (barbarian), slave, serf, freeman, citizen, nobility, aristocracy under agrarianism. At present we have about the same hierarchy but military, commercial, and intellectual are in competition for the body politic (labor and women). SO the hierarchy goes in three directions, rather than one. And the three directions compete (gossip/talk, commerce/trade, law/force). At present the court mediates the market between the directions. The difference with castes is that you are justifying someone’s status by the beneficial function that they serve in society ,a nd preserving defense against outbreeding (downbreeding), and all sorts of ‘democracy’ and its religious equivalents. There is nothing bad about hindu religion at all other than the fact that they are weak, and lack sufficient middle class to produce courts free of familial corruption. I don’t like the silly mystical stuff. But that aside it’s a good system. Islam is the worst of all possible worlds. Equalitarian ignorance with mandated hostile aggression to perform consumption on the capital of other civilizations.

  • To Elders of The Black Sun 3 : Possible Orders

    October 17th, 2018 9:46 AM TO ELDERS OF THE BLACK SUN 3 : POSSIBLE ORDERS [O]K, so you are producing sufficient depth of thought so that if you work at it enough you can produce a canon. Organizational charts (prescriptions) are open to implementation the way simple sentimental resonance (Evola) is not. However, all civilizations are organized by law (or more precisely, rules). Islam is ‘easy’ because the rules are so complete, and an imbecile can memorize the myth, and principles through repetition. Christianity was imposed by coercion (literacy), as a market competition between church (nobility) and military (aristocracy). Judaism is used to preserve separatism. Hindu ‘law’ is limited but the mythos vast. Buddhism always and everywhere coexists with a martial or bureaucratic state. Hinduism and Shintoism do not need so much ‘authority’ because of genetic and cultural homogeneity. Christianity was germanicized for the same reason. Orthodoxy and islam exist across less developed (market) peoples (orthodoxy), and islam across both less developed and tribal peoples (constant hostility). We do not succeed with ideal religions. We succeed with religions that solve a problem. What religion will solve the problem of modernity AND ethnocentrism, since ethnocentrism is the optimum organizing method as long as it’s not regressive. Jews survived by parasitism on existing civilizations through profit from moral hazard, accumulating capital, and then using it for more moral hazard, until they were cast out. During that entire time they contributed nothing to humanity (competitiveness) until converted to aristotelianism. In general, either (a) produce a fiction that people want to run to for economic or political reasons (marxism, postmodernism, feminism); (b) produce an economic order that people want to run to for economic reasons; (c) Produce a Myth of Conquest by which a small group of men can take advantage of a weakness in a current order; (d) produce an improvement in a mythos over a homogenous polity that provides greater explanatory power, and greater utility, and greater methods of cooperation in new (current) conditions. There are only three possible incentives in the production of order: Law/Violence, Commerce/Wealth, Cult/Cooperation