The optimum function of a headman from the family, clan, tribe, nation, empire (civilization), is not to lead outside of war – it is to function as a judge of last resort in matters of conflict between those who lead, and to limit those who lead to the people’s interests.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 14:49:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050398059270758405
The optimum function of a headman from the family, clan, tribe, nation, empire (civilization), is not to lead outside of war – it is to function as a judge of last resort in matters of conflict between those who lead, and to limit those who lead to the people’s interests.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 10:49:00 UTC
October 10th, 2018 11:21 AM
—“None of these three ideologies has anything to do with abrahamic religions: …”Universalism. Universalism. Monopoly. Monopoly. Communist monopoly, libertarian monopoly, neocon monopoly = abrahamic monopoly. THE HERD DOES NOT UNDERSTAND IT IS A HERD. -CD…”—
1) I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job not to. 2) Each social order (Wisdom literature), whether legal(western), rational(chinese) theological(Semitic), or literary(Indian), relies on criteria of decidability and method of argument in support those criteria. 3) We can train physical abilities, intuition-emotion, reason, and skills of transformation. We have developed ritual, religion, stoicism, and philosophy to train intuition & emotion and intuition, and developed calculation for reason, and techne for skills 4) Semitic argument consists of the sophisms of pilpul, critique, false promise, moral hazard, monopoly control of information, using threats of ostracization, disapproval, shaming, gossip, rallying and reputation destruction to impose a monopoly by suggestion and intimidation. 5) We call this combination of sophism (psuedo-rationalism), supernaturalism (occult), false history (pseudoscience) ritual indoctrination, false promise (fraud) to create a monopoly of conformity to falsehoods a “Religion” even though doing so is unique to the Semitic Religions. 6) This form of argument like mathematics, logic, writing, language or any other technology, is traceable throughout history as the incremental evolution of a technique of deception. It is used to produce natural neurochemical (opiate) responses and functions as an addiction. 7) So just as the Romans invented empirical law with the help of aristotle and zeno, the Greeks invented idealism and ideal argument, the semites invented the sophistries of pilpul and critique and threats of ostracization thus weaponizing the female group strategy in argument. 8) meanwhile the west produced hero-worship, civic ritual, the cult of the empirical law of tort, reason, rationalism, empiricism, science as an evolution of their criteria of decidability: individual sovereignty, with disputes resolved by law of tort, and a MARKET for ideas. 9) It’s not that I don’t understand religion. It’s that I understand it completely; how to replace its falsehoods completely; and that abrahamic religions were responsible for the dark ages, and the destruction of all the great civilizations in the ancient world – and modern. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
Universalism. Universalism. Monopoly. Monopoly. Communist monopoly, libertarian monopoly, neocon monopoly = abrahamic monopoly.
THE HERD DOES NOT UNDERSTAND IT IS A HERD.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 09:02:00 UTC
October 9th, 2018 9:45 AM [T]he only historic facts we know are that (a) someone seems to have existed, (b) the fact that temples functioned as banks necessary for trade, and the uprising at the temple, (c)the prosecution and crucifixion of this person. Every other aspect appears to have been produced by the fictionalization and incorporation of other myths, that like all of judaism, began either in mesopotamia, persia, egypt, or greece. We can document and have the evolution of each of the myths, from the first evidence in anatolia, to the spread throughout the fertile crescent.
The fact that most muslim scholars support the story of mohammed against all historical evidence. The fact that most christian scholars support the story of jesus against the historical evidence. And the fact that most jewish scholars support the existence of each of the characters and events, despite the evidence, tells us nothing. Truth is not determined by democracy, or by opinion, nor by historical authorship, but by evidence that survives falsification of all of the above. Someone named jesus seems to have lived. However, the only evidence we have that does not have origin in other myths and religions, is (a) uprising at the temple, (b) prosecution, (c) crucifiction. EVERYTHING ELSE was intentionally imported from prior religions synthesizing Seneca the Younger’s Stoicism, Greek Neo Platonism (idealism)/Authoritarianism, and Jewish pro roman reformation authors. The origin of the ‘risen after three days’ is most interesting because it actually refers to the morning star which, in the jewish tradition, was not just Horace but Lucifer.
October 9th, 2018 9:45 AM [T]he only historic facts we know are that (a) someone seems to have existed, (b) the fact that temples functioned as banks necessary for trade, and the uprising at the temple, (c)the prosecution and crucifixion of this person. Every other aspect appears to have been produced by the fictionalization and incorporation of other myths, that like all of judaism, began either in mesopotamia, persia, egypt, or greece. We can document and have the evolution of each of the myths, from the first evidence in anatolia, to the spread throughout the fertile crescent.
The fact that most muslim scholars support the story of mohammed against all historical evidence. The fact that most christian scholars support the story of jesus against the historical evidence. And the fact that most jewish scholars support the existence of each of the characters and events, despite the evidence, tells us nothing. Truth is not determined by democracy, or by opinion, nor by historical authorship, but by evidence that survives falsification of all of the above. Someone named jesus seems to have lived. However, the only evidence we have that does not have origin in other myths and religions, is (a) uprising at the temple, (b) prosecution, (c) crucifiction. EVERYTHING ELSE was intentionally imported from prior religions synthesizing Seneca the Younger’s Stoicism, Greek Neo Platonism (idealism)/Authoritarianism, and Jewish pro roman reformation authors. The origin of the ‘risen after three days’ is most interesting because it actually refers to the morning star which, in the jewish tradition, was not just Horace but Lucifer.
The only historic facts we know are that (a) someone seems to have existed, (b) the fact that temples functioned as banks necessary for trade, and the uprising at the temple, (c)the prosecution and crucifixion of this person.
Every other aspect appears to have been produced by the fictionalization and incorporation of other myths, that like all of judaism, began either in mesopotamia, persia, egypt, or greece.
We can document and have the evolution of each of the myths, from the first evidence in anatolia, to the spread throughout the fertile crescent.
—
The fact that most muslim scholars support the story of mohammed against all historical evidence. The fact that most christian scholars support the story of jesus against the historical evidence. And the fact that most jewish scholars support the existence of each of the characters and events, despite the evidence, tells us nothing. Truth is not determined by democracy, or by opinion, nor by historical authorship, but by evidence that survives falsification of all of the above.
Someone named jesus seems to have lived. However, the only evidence we have that does not have origin in other myths and religions, is (a) uprising at the temple, (b) prosecution, (c) crucifiction.
EVERYTHING ELSE was intentionally imported from prior religions synthesizing Seneca the Younger’s Stoicism, Greek Neo Platonism (idealism)/Authoritarianism, and Jewish pro roman reformation authors.
The origin of the ‘risen after three days’ is most interesting because it actually refers to the morning star which, in the jewish tradition, was not just Horace but Lucifer.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 09:45:00 UTC
2) But then, that many Peterson’s would create a MONOPOLY rather than a market for classical liberal professorial talent wouldn’t it?
But wait, that’s what Progressive/Liberals/Leftists want, right? Monopolies? Monotheism, Equality, Non-identity, Proportionality, herd?
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 03:47:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1049506560949538816
Reply addressees: @NoahRevoy @jordanbpeterson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048916888997318657
IN REPLY TO:
@NoahRevoy
Many on the left think that @jordanbpeterson has become too divisive to continue as a university professor. At this point no outcome is acceptable therefore I publically call on Peterson to step aside so that a less divisive person can be appointed to teach his courses.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048916888997318657
1) lol… well you know, if it’s FAIR we’re looking for, then we need to clone enough Peterson’s to eliminate the 300+ to 1 representation in the academy, and the 1000+ to one in the ‘media’ (entertainment) biz.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 03:47:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1049506494117502976
Reply addressees: @NoahRevoy @jordanbpeterson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048916888997318657
IN REPLY TO:
@NoahRevoy
Many on the left think that @jordanbpeterson has become too divisive to continue as a university professor. At this point no outcome is acceptable therefore I publically call on Peterson to step aside so that a less divisive person can be appointed to teach his courses.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048916888997318657
WHY WHITE PRIVILEGE? HERE IS THE CORRECT ANSWER: THE ECONOMICS OF ASSOCIATION IN HETEROGENEOUS POLITIES
It’s because ethnic europeans, particularly northern europeans, largely because of geography and culture came out of the dark ages first, had the enlightenment first, developed the first fully middle class civilization first, and did so both genetically, culturally, and institutionally, by using militias due to weak central governments, individual sovereignty because of militias, rule of law not rule by discretion, manorialism’s suppression of underclass rates of reproduction, and by aggressive hanging of criminal population for 1000 years, and as a consequence producing the highest trust society, with the highest trust population.
So, in commerce and politics ethnic europeans have obtained a premium for their (earned) reputation for relative trustworthiness and work ethic (middle class public behavior), and they preserve the premium through intergenerational transfer of those habits, norms, traditions, and values.
The problem is that high trust polities and a ‘deserved’ reputation for high trust is extremely expensive and no other people so far have been able to produce it except the Japanese and Koreans. This is the reason for the west’s higher standard of living.
The rest is due to demographic distributions, meaning that the vast majority of ethnic europeans are within one degree of the genetic middle class (meaning that they can learn to use technology independently by reading), whereas the vast majority of peoples who complain about the reputational advantage of ethnic europeans are from groups with historically larger underclasses, and therefore, lower medians, where cultural norms are determined by the median, and we are all judged by ‘averages (median) of our group”. Why? Because stereotypes are the most accurate measurement in the social sciences. They are verified or falsified every day in ever personal interaction.
We are all punished for (experience discounts), and privileged for (experience premiums) our identities: manners, ethics, morals, habits, body language, hygiene, speech pattern, vocabulary, dress, fitness, and everything else.
To lose your discount or gain a premium, change your group’s sexual, social, economic, intellectual, and market value, by changing your group’s demographics, habits, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, values, rituals so that they are ALSO middle class (market) rather than whatever tradition you come from. it’s not complicated. Before the 1964 immigration act, everyone who came to america did it.
The lesson is that people are not scarce. Individuals are not special.Humans by and large are a commodity. There are, if anything, far too many of us. People must work hard to find some way of providing value to others so that they are useful in the marketplace for sexual, social, economic, political cooperation. And because value is rare, and people are not scarce, all people are careful in making the best investments that they can. And they invest in what they can see.
Hence why jews and asians do better than ethnic europeans in american university acceptance, but no one criticizes them. While whites are criticized daily, and experience reverse discrimination in the academy, politics, and the media, while preserving their economic advantage in the work place, and their social status.
So, it’s not a privilege, it’s a cultural premium for 1350 years of suppression of underclass reproduction and downward expansion of the middle class. And training your children to do what is uncomfortable in order to obtain long term benefits of conforming to middle class behaviors.
And it’s almost impossible to alter for that reason.
People from other cultures or ethnicities assume white identity is arbitrary but it is merely the universal adaptation of middle class market behavior on a civilizational scale.
Join the middle class by acting as middle class, and getting others with your identity to act middle class. It’s not complicated, but it’s terribly difficult, which is why so few cultures can do it without many generations of middle class civilization.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 00:27:00 UTC