Theme: Incentives

  • Female peak sexual market value :23 Male peak sexual market value: 36 Male peak

    Female peak sexual market value :23 Male peak sexual market value: 36 Male peak economic sexual market value: 48. Female superiority in service economy market value – persistent. Male inferiority in service economy market value – persistent. End of both gender’s economic market value: ~72. Half-Life of maximum human lifespan: ~60 We waste almost all the time between 14 and 21 in full time education with demonstratively negative returns, instead of splitting the time between work and part time education. That’s the data. Change it and we change the generational organization of western civilization.
  • Female peak sexual market value :23 Male peak sexual market value: 36 Male peak

    Female peak sexual market value :23

    Male peak sexual market value: 36

    Male peak economic sexual market value: 48.

    Female superiority in service economy market value – persistent.

    Male inferiority in service economy market value – persistent.

    End of both gender’s economic market value: ~72.

    Half-Life of maximum human lifespan: ~60

    We waste almost all the time between 14 and 21 in full time education with demonstratively negative returns, instead of splitting the time between work and part time education.

    That’s the data.

    Change it and we change the generational organization of western civilization.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-11 10:08:00 UTC

  • THE REASON FOR “PROGRESSIVE” CLASS INCREASES The lifting of the laboring and und

    THE REASON FOR “PROGRESSIVE” CLASS INCREASES The lifting of the laboring and underclasses from subsistence to consumption was made possible by the increases in relative productivity. In other words, we are simply wealthy enough that we can afford (for a time) to reverse four thousand years of the domestication of human groups, by the rapid expansion of th eunderclasses and their movement from rural agrarian marginal self-sustenance to Nothing occurred because of feminine (left’s) good intentions, but instead the left caused the consumption of increases in productivity as increases in population rather than the traditional western means of increasing the commons. People were not oppressed. They were domesticated, generation by generation like every other animal through harsh winters, manorialism (most important) and aggressive hanging of up to one percent of the population every year. The industrial revolution reversed the trend, and we have already lost one standard deviation in median intelligence in the much of the west through dysgenia. Cities are exacerbating the issue since they are IQ and ovary graveyards. This is just the data. It is what it is.
  • I might restate this as “The people who participate directly in the market are t

    I might restate this as “The people who participate directly in the market are the only people with the incentive to succeed by moral means. The people who don’t participate in the market have every incentive to succeed by immoral means.”


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-09 03:45:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971955099177283584

    Reply addressees: @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971836585699348481


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971836585699348481

  • “The people who participate directly in the market are the only people with the

    “The people who participate directly in the market are the only people with the incentive to succeed by moral means. The people who don’t participate in the market have every incentive to succeed by immoral means.”
  • “The people who participate directly in the market are the only people with the

    “The people who participate directly in the market are the only people with the incentive to succeed by moral means. The people who don’t participate in the market have every incentive to succeed by immoral means.”


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-08 23:19:00 UTC

  • “The people who participate directly in the market are the only people with the

    “The people who participate directly in the market are the only people with the incentive to succeed by moral means. The people who don’t participate in the market have every incentive to succeed by immoral means.”
  • It depends upon your earning capacity, because the best places to live are very

    It depends upon your earning capacity, because the best places to live are very expensive. It was seattle in the 90’s, Bellevue in the 00’s. It has been san-fran since then although the bay area is ‘done’ I think. It’s probably the research triangle in North Carolina or Austin.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-07 13:35:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971378781238697984

    Reply addressees: @AlHernandez21

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971377106092548096


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971377106092548096

  • Peterson And Doolittle

    by William Benge Peterson energizes the incentives for positiva in the personal and interpersonal realm, whereas Doolittle is working to lay out the more costly and precision-bound negativa as instrument for reversing present mischief and preventing any future aberrations. Of course, there is overlap. POSITIVA FOR SELF We cannot imagine Peterson’s positiva holding capacity to level and decimate the world’s greatest culprits, the fed and CIA. Nonetheless, Peterson does inculcate condemnation and rejection of the false premises the Fed and CIA (commies) operate upon, while at the same time exciting both reason and action toward sensible positiva in the personal sphere. RECIPROCITY/SUPPRESSION NEGATIVA Whereas, Doolittle’s negativa can be employed to destroy the 1) position of every actor within these nefarious institutions (also proceed to invalidate the institutions themselves) AND the 2) position of any sympathetic supporters (commies) underneath or aside those institutions. COLLECTIVISM AS NATIONALISM Peterson and Doolittle are partnered in destroying this forever.
  • “I got paid more as an assistant teacher, with no meaningful responsibilities, w

    —“I got paid more as an assistant teacher, with no meaningful responsibilities, working ten months a year, and all the school vacations, than I was paid to run the savings department at over six hundred branches of savings and loan.”— (a friend)