The causal relation between disasters and frequency is population density to lower the cost of infrastructure so that taxes can be directed to the bureaucracy’s payroll and pensions (really, thats the reason).
Theme: Incentives
-
Pope?
Too liberal? He’s looked at the numbers and the church is and always has been a business – and he’s following the incentives: the church is only going to survive in room temperature IQ communities. Foolish because it’s not that we don’t want the church. We just want our own. -
The Frequency Of Disasters
The causal relation between disasters and frequency is population density to lower the cost of infrastructure so that taxes can be directed to the bureaucracy’s payroll and pensions (really, thats the reason). -
POPE? Too liberal? He’s looked at the numbers and the church is and always has b
POPE?
Too liberal? He’s looked at the numbers and the church is and always has been a business – and he’s following the incentives: the church is only going to survive in room temperature IQ communities. Foolish because it’s not that we don’t want the church. We just want our own.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 20:50:00 UTC
-
THE FREQUENCY OF DISASTERS The causal relation between disasters and frequency i
THE FREQUENCY OF DISASTERS
The causal relation between disasters and frequency is population density to lower the cost of infrastructure so that taxes can be directed to the bureaucracy’s payroll and pensions (really, thats the reason).
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 20:50:00 UTC
-
You Do Not Debate Or Argue With Women. You Give Them What You Can And Deny Them What You Must.
I have made this argument over and over again, my difference is that I do not believe the incentive exists for women to force the change unless we counter-react against crazy-women (which is a very large percentage of women) by threat of binding ALL women. Hence my emphasis on truthful reciprocal speech. -
You Do Not Debate Or Argue With Women. You Give Them What You Can And Deny Them What You Must.
I have made this argument over and over again, my difference is that I do not believe the incentive exists for women to force the change unless we counter-react against crazy-women (which is a very large percentage of women) by threat of binding ALL women. Hence my emphasis on truthful reciprocal speech. -
DO NOT DEBATE OR ARGUE WITH WOMEN. YOU GIVE THEM WHAT YOU CAN AND DENY THEM WHAT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=veVONaeTBVMYOU DO NOT DEBATE OR ARGUE WITH WOMEN. YOU GIVE THEM WHAT YOU CAN AND DENY THEM WHAT YOU MUST.
I have made this argument over and over again, my difference is that I do not believe the incentive exists for women to force the change unless we counter-react against crazy-women (which is a very large percentage of women) by threat of binding ALL women. Hence my emphasis on truthful reciprocal speech.Updated Mar 16, 2018, 12:48 PM
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 12:48:00 UTC
-
“Really, when you think about it, movie theaters are basically concession stands
—“Really, when you think about it, movie theaters are basically concession stands that rely on movies to bring people in the door.”— -
“Really, when you think about it, movie theaters are basically concession stands
—“Really, when you think about it, movie theaters are basically concession stands that rely on movies to bring people in the door.”—