FB has to go the telco route and add taboos and dislikes to disassociate people with conflicting interests, thus allowing companies to avoid advertising to, or to advertise to, preferences, interests, taboos and dislikes.
The truth is they already have the data but don’t like the consequences of it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-16 10:38:00 UTC
NRx provides the correct diagnosis but an impossible and undesirable cure. All but entrepreneurs seek to circumvent property, ownership, and meritocracy, and more and fewer and fewer people participate in risk. We hold back the tide. The tide is just awfully big now.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 21:36:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/985632880314540032
Reply addressees: @Outsideness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/985578461220630528
IN REPLY TO:
@Outsideness
Awkward NRx insight: Fascist lunacy is far better tailored to popular acceptance than NRx. …
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/985578461220630528
(Newbies) Dominance play is necessary to maintain male interest, just as approval-play is necessary for female interest. Lack of that incentive is the reason for male abandonment of any responsibility for the social order: in order to provide coed education we have eliminated the prevalence of dominance play in education. Example: “Russian speaking girls learn english in school, Russian speaking boys learn it from playing video games and reading computer manuals.” I ‘teach’ online by encouraging dominance play – and redirecting it. One of the secrets to the western virtue is that we redirected dominance play to the commons (heroism) rather than to inter-gender, inter-clan, and tribe (kin status). (There is a reason so many very smart, high dominance, super-geeks follow me. I understand this.) Apr 15, 2018 1:14pm
(Newbies) Dominance play is necessary to maintain male interest, just as approval-play is necessary for female interest. Lack of that incentive is the reason for male abandonment of any responsibility for the social order: in order to provide coed education we have eliminated the prevalence of dominance play in education. Example: “Russian speaking girls learn english in school, Russian speaking boys learn it from playing video games and reading computer manuals.” I ‘teach’ online by encouraging dominance play – and redirecting it. One of the secrets to the western virtue is that we redirected dominance play to the commons (heroism) rather than to inter-gender, inter-clan, and tribe (kin status). (There is a reason so many very smart, high dominance, super-geeks follow me. I understand this.) Apr 15, 2018 1:14pm
TEACHING – OUR “SCHOOL” IS DOMINANCE PLAY
(Newbies)
Dominance play is necessary to maintain male interest, just as approval-play is necessary for female interest.
Lack of that incentive is the reason for male abandonment of any responsibility for the social order: in order to provide coed education we have eliminated the prevalence of dominance play in education.
Example:
“Russian speaking girls learn english in school, Russian speaking boys learn it from playing video games and reading computer manuals.”
I ‘teach’ online by encouraging dominance play – and redirecting it. One of the secrets to the western virtue is that we redirected dominance play to the commons (heroism) rather than to inter-gender, inter-clan, and tribe (kin status).
(There is a reason so many very smart, high dominance, super-geeks follow me. I understand this.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 13:14:00 UTC
A group specializing in low trust lying, particularly by moral hazard, will defeat a group specializing in high trust truth, for the simple reason that lies and deceits are cheaper to produce than truths, and far more expensive to defend against. So the only solution is the constant aggressive suppression of falsehoods through the only means of doing so: tort.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 11:20:00 UTC
Our people suffer because their high trust is exploitable via rents, where that high trust is not exploitable by credit rents elsewhere. To eliminate this parasitism, we have the choice to cease trustworthiness or to destroy rents. As such I choose, and I am certain we will all choose, to destroy those rents. By destroying rents we will force investments into innovation at risk rather than parasitism on the externalization of risk. Correcting the rent system is actually quite easy.
Our people suffer because their high trust is exploitable via rents, where that high trust is not exploitable by credit rents elsewhere. To eliminate this parasitism, we have the choice to cease trustworthiness or to destroy rents. As such I choose, and I am certain we will all choose, to destroy those rents. By destroying rents we will force investments into innovation at risk rather than parasitism on the externalization of risk. Correcting the rent system is actually quite easy.
Our people suffer because their high trust is exploitable via rents, where that high trust is not exploitable by credit rents elsewhere.
To eliminate this parasitism, we have the choice to cease trustworthiness or to destroy rents.
As such I choose, and I am certain we will all choose, to destroy those rents.
By destroying rents we will force investments into innovation at risk rather than parasitism on the externalization of risk.
Correcting the rent system is actually quite easy.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-14 09:23:00 UTC
Monopoly leads to hierarchy and dysgenia, and markets lead to relative equality and eugenics.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-08 01:01:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982785470181597184
Reply addressees: @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981725549549633536
IN REPLY TO:
@Steve_Sailer
Steve Sailer’s new column at Taki’s Magazine:
What does the Deep History of China’s and India’s DNA tell us about the two giga-countries’ futures?
https://t.co/cgM1wM2vMA https://t.co/ZjabqEkXat
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981725549549633536