Theme: Incentives

  • Half the story. The other half consists of productivity, credit capacity. In oth

    Half the story. The other half consists of productivity, credit capacity. In other words, if we under-utilize credit capacity we are underachieving social goods.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-07 22:52:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982752970478583808

    Reply addressees: @wef

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982751632063631361


    IN REPLY TO:

    @wef

    This is how much debt your country has per person https://t.co/f4EPX0uUAg #economics https://t.co/UzC8qP9VCk

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982751632063631361

  • Correct. However, it wasn’t just the philosophers. It was our ancient common law

    Correct. However, it wasn’t just the philosophers. It was our ancient common law. No one else discovered truth telling. Because no one else had an incentive to tell the observable truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-07 22:49:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982752341026844672

    Reply addressees: @Steve_Sailer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982462664176648192


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Steve_Sailer

    Chris Dixon explained how Western philosophy laid groundwork for computing with clickbaity title “How Aristotle Created the Computer;” but, he’s right: “The philosophers he influenced set the stage for the technological revolution that remade our world.”

    https://t.co/cLnrKvJkEx https://t.co/YxXqecNLsl

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982462664176648192

  • Salesmanship

      People want a salesman that they think can understand them. The way you make people think you understand them is through listening, and paraphrasing, and preferably adding a touch of insight to the paraphrasing. So the principle issue with sales is getting the other person to talk, because when you’re talking, you’re not listening, and if you’re not listening, you aren’t paraphrasing. It’s only after we have negotiated this ‘protocol’ of shared understanding that we can begin to ‘inform’ and only once we have informed, we can persuade. The best classes I have taken and taught have been in personality traits and sales. I taught sales for quite a few years and built some very good sales teams, and it’s a very simple process. The only difficulty is in finding leads. Sales is easy. It’s just not efficient. And it’s the people who understand it’s inefficient and have high tolerance or interest in listening to and understanding potential customers that develop into good salesman. Extroversion (getting a charge from interactions) is extremely valuable. Apr 07, 2018 12:36pm

  • Salesmanship

      People want a salesman that they think can understand them. The way you make people think you understand them is through listening, and paraphrasing, and preferably adding a touch of insight to the paraphrasing. So the principle issue with sales is getting the other person to talk, because when you’re talking, you’re not listening, and if you’re not listening, you aren’t paraphrasing. It’s only after we have negotiated this ‘protocol’ of shared understanding that we can begin to ‘inform’ and only once we have informed, we can persuade. The best classes I have taken and taught have been in personality traits and sales. I taught sales for quite a few years and built some very good sales teams, and it’s a very simple process. The only difficulty is in finding leads. Sales is easy. It’s just not efficient. And it’s the people who understand it’s inefficient and have high tolerance or interest in listening to and understanding potential customers that develop into good salesman. Extroversion (getting a charge from interactions) is extremely valuable. Apr 07, 2018 12:36pm

  • SALESMANSHIP People want a salesman that they think can understand them. The way

    SALESMANSHIP

    People want a salesman that they think can understand them. The way you make people think you understand them is through listening, and paraphrasing, and preferably adding a touch of insight to the paraphrasing. So the principle issue with sales is getting the other person to talk, because when you’re talking, you’re not listening, and if you’re not listening, you aren’t paraphrasing. It’s only after we have negotiated this ‘protocol’ of shared understanding that we can begin to ‘inform’ and only once we have informed, we can persuade. The best classes I have taken and taught have been in personality traits and sales. I taught sales for quite a few years and built some very good sales teams, and it’s a very simple process. The only difficulty is in finding leads. Sales is easy. It’s just not efficient. And it’s the people who understand it’s inefficient and have high tolerance or interest in listening to and understanding potential customers that develop into good salesman. Extroversion (getting a charge from interactions) is extremely valuable.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-07 12:36:00 UTC

  • —“How will the petroyuan affect the future of the American economy?”—

    by T Michael Lutas via Quora Assuming that the petroyuan actually takes off, the US will have an inflationary impulse as petrodollars cycle back to the US at last and US Fed interest rates have to rise in order to soak them up. Assuming that the Fed doesn’t completely mishandle things, it will be a short term bump depending on the amount of petroyuan contracts. Strategically, the bigger the petroyuan, the less room China will have to continue on its current economic road, something that will greatly advantage the United States, if the US is smart enough to take advantage of it. China depends on economic manipulation to keep its economy going at a level far beyond what foreigners are comfortable with. China can survive the disapproval of these foreign governments and private economic players because the vast majority of yuan are kept within the borders of China where short selling yuan is not legal. The larger the yuan market outside of the PRC government control, the more likely someone will replicate George Soros’ feat when he broke the english pound. If anyone succeeds, they will make Soros look like a pauper. Alternatively, China could clean up its act, keep honest economic books, and merrily advance its way to real world power. But it keeps those books crooked for a reason. It is unlikely that the CCP would survive in its current role if those economic bookkeeping reforms were to happen. It is very likely that the CCP knows it because keeping crooked books is a tremendous source of inefficiency and economic misallocation for China and this is commonly known.

  • —“How will the petroyuan affect the future of the American economy?”—

    by T Michael Lutas via Quora Assuming that the petroyuan actually takes off, the US will have an inflationary impulse as petrodollars cycle back to the US at last and US Fed interest rates have to rise in order to soak them up. Assuming that the Fed doesn’t completely mishandle things, it will be a short term bump depending on the amount of petroyuan contracts. Strategically, the bigger the petroyuan, the less room China will have to continue on its current economic road, something that will greatly advantage the United States, if the US is smart enough to take advantage of it. China depends on economic manipulation to keep its economy going at a level far beyond what foreigners are comfortable with. China can survive the disapproval of these foreign governments and private economic players because the vast majority of yuan are kept within the borders of China where short selling yuan is not legal. The larger the yuan market outside of the PRC government control, the more likely someone will replicate George Soros’ feat when he broke the english pound. If anyone succeeds, they will make Soros look like a pauper. Alternatively, China could clean up its act, keep honest economic books, and merrily advance its way to real world power. But it keeps those books crooked for a reason. It is unlikely that the CCP would survive in its current role if those economic bookkeeping reforms were to happen. It is very likely that the CCP knows it because keeping crooked books is a tremendous source of inefficiency and economic misallocation for China and this is commonly known.

  • NO, LABOR IS DEAD WEIGHT NOT VALUABLE Thats nonsense, since all the money in the

    NO, LABOR IS DEAD WEIGHT NOT VALUABLE

    Thats nonsense, since all the money in the world will eventually find someone to do the work.

    Empirically, we pay people in proportion to how many people (or what materials) that they organize. This is irrefutable. So the market calculates labor as nearly valueless. And differences in compensation between states a reflection of stages of development (choices of labor.)

    In other words, we pay people according to their vaue and their value is in ordganizing people and things to produce stuff that others will pay for having organized people and things.

    Labor flees to cheap countries with unskilled people for precisely the reason that it is of no value.

    Marx died knowing he was wrong. He’d read Menger and understood he’d failed. He just couldn’t tell Engels or he’d starve. We know that because we can see his notes and when he stopped writing. He stopped writing when he understood his entire edifice was built on falsehoods.

    The dirty secret of history is that those civilizations that produced the most eugenic agrarianism created the highest standards of living. Labor is not only valueless it’s dead weight. If you cannot organize people and things you are not valuable.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-04 21:55:00 UTC

  • End The Immigration of Labor

    The nuclear family lets itself to a village where extended family is nearby and children move between households to provide labor rather than paying the cost of slaves. (really, that’s the answer). The nuclear family requires very cheap land. This is probably the most overlooked cost. The benefit of the nuclear household and shared labor, is that (a) it’s possible for family capital to be mobile, (b) it prevents dysgenia from slavery, (c) delays childbirth, and (d) prevents dysgenia from underclass reproduction. The nuclear family is also superior under early capitalism where we move people to capital. The problem is, it’s destructive. Move capital to people rather than people to capital. END IMMIGRATION OF LABOR.

  • End The Immigration of Labor

    The nuclear family lets itself to a village where extended family is nearby and children move between households to provide labor rather than paying the cost of slaves. (really, that’s the answer). The nuclear family requires very cheap land. This is probably the most overlooked cost. The benefit of the nuclear household and shared labor, is that (a) it’s possible for family capital to be mobile, (b) it prevents dysgenia from slavery, (c) delays childbirth, and (d) prevents dysgenia from underclass reproduction. The nuclear family is also superior under early capitalism where we move people to capital. The problem is, it’s destructive. Move capital to people rather than people to capital. END IMMIGRATION OF LABOR.