Curt Doolittle

Theme: Incentives

  • people from good families and tribes vs those who are not. you value what is val

    people from good families and tribes vs those who are not. you value what is valuable to you, and all psychologism is fraud. Either you can explain incentives or you are a gossip (excuse maker) and nothing more.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-23 20:35:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/988516752333197320

    Reply addressees: @shadihamid @guardian

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/988449872641757185

    IN REPLY TO:

    @shadihamid

    My new @guardian essay on American tribalism

    “Our tribal ‘moment’ is anything but; it’s a return to normalcy after a brief whiff of exceptionalism, of being outside history”

    https://t.co/9axJHgmWIq

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/988449872641757185

  • BAD TASTE bad taste is a matter of ignorance (lack of skill), and therefore lack

    BAD TASTE

    bad taste is a matter of ignorance (lack of skill), and therefore lack of ability, lack of investment, or malinvestment.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-23 18:24:00 UTC

  • Future of Employment

    We have entered an age where all increases in productivity are offset by increases in inflation, the purpose of which is to preserve employment, of people who are increasingly unemployable, and wage suppression of the working (meaning non-calculating, professional, non-entrepreneurial) classes will continue indefinitely as the world increasingly adds competing labor to the world labor pool. Every person in the middle is only 20% more productive than consumptive, and then only so for certain period of his or her life. so every person at the bottom quartile requires five people to pay for his existence throughout his life. Ergo, we must choose between decreasing the standard of living for all but the upper quintile, and constantly increasing inequality, or suppressing the rates of reproduction of the bottom and producing increasingly consistent equality. There is no alternative. Economics is just an extension of physics.

  • Future of Employment

    We have entered an age where all increases in productivity are offset by increases in inflation, the purpose of which is to preserve employment, of people who are increasingly unemployable, and wage suppression of the working (meaning non-calculating, professional, non-entrepreneurial) classes will continue indefinitely as the world increasingly adds competing labor to the world labor pool. Every person in the middle is only 20% more productive than consumptive, and then only so for certain period of his or her life. so every person at the bottom quartile requires five people to pay for his existence throughout his life. Ergo, we must choose between decreasing the standard of living for all but the upper quintile, and constantly increasing inequality, or suppressing the rates of reproduction of the bottom and producing increasingly consistent equality. There is no alternative. Economics is just an extension of physics.

  • Psychopathy like autism is not a problem other than incentives are more importan

    Psychopathy like autism is not a problem other than incentives are more important to psychopaths than normies. One of the reasons for (((other groups))) success with our high trust group is that they are in fact more sociopathic.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 12:40:00 UTC

  • We have entered an age where all increases in productivity are offset by increas

    We have entered an age where all increases in productivity are offset by increases in inflation, the purpose of which is to preserve employment, of people who are increasingly unemployable, and wage suppression of the working (meaning non-calculating, professional, non-entrepreneurial) classes will continue indefinitely as the world increasingly adds competing labor to the world labor pool. Every person in the middle is only 20% more productive than consumptive, and then only so for certain period of his or her life. so every person at the bottom quartile requires five people to pay for his existence throughout his life. Ergo, we must choose between decreasing the standard of living for all but the upper quintile, and constantly increasing inequality, or suppressing the rates of reproduction of the bottom and producing increasingly consistent equality. There is no alternative. Economics is just an extension of physics.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-20 22:04:00 UTC

  • SMV

    The endless supply of 17-23 year old girls that send photos to web sites to test (raise) their market value (SMV), and the endless supply of men’s attention that will never tire of ‘window shopping’ same sites (pages, streams, forums). The age of 23 is peak female SMV (market value), because it is peak fertility. However, long term SMV, differs greatly. In other words, it’s pretty hard to be 23 and not attractive. It’s pretty hard to be over 35 and be attractive. And only the best genes last beyond 45. Now men, we don’t peak until 34 or so, and our SMV only increases if we remain fit, sociable, and have assets. The difference between the genders is that we can choose to have high SMV – OR CHOOSE NOT TO.

  • SMV

    The endless supply of 17-23 year old girls that send photos to web sites to test (raise) their market value (SMV), and the endless supply of men’s attention that will never tire of ‘window shopping’ same sites (pages, streams, forums). The age of 23 is peak female SMV (market value), because it is peak fertility. However, long term SMV, differs greatly. In other words, it’s pretty hard to be 23 and not attractive. It’s pretty hard to be over 35 and be attractive. And only the best genes last beyond 45. Now men, we don’t peak until 34 or so, and our SMV only increases if we remain fit, sociable, and have assets. The difference between the genders is that we can choose to have high SMV – OR CHOOSE NOT TO.

  • The endless supply of 17-23 year old girls that send photos to web sites to test

    The endless supply of 17-23 year old girls that send photos to web sites to test (raise) their market value (SMV), and the endless supply of men’s attention that will never tire of ‘window shopping’ same sites (pages, streams, forums). The age of 23 is peak female SMV (market value), because it is peak fertility. However, long term SMV, differs greatly. In other words, it’s pretty hard to be 23 and not attractive. It’s pretty hard to be over 35 and be attractive. And only the best genes last beyond 45. Now men, we don’t peak until 34 or so, and our SMV only increases if we remain fit, sociable, and have assets. The difference between the genders is that we can choose to have high SMV – OR CHOOSE NOT TO.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 10:01:00 UTC

  • You see, there is a big difference between saying “this would be good” and askin

    You see, there is a big difference between saying “this would be good” and asking the question “what information and incentives are available under these conditions?”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 09:40:00 UTC