All decisions are a matter of supply and demand fully accounted across all causal dimensions. This one is between regulatory, time, and production costs one does not control vs those one does. Heat dissipation is not impossible in space. We are experts at it. That is why every major producer is investing in it.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-12 01:30:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1999290749880558074
Is it? or is it a bureaucratic one, an energy transportation problem, a time to completion problem, and a financing problem? I mean its relatively fast and cheap to launch satellites. Look at Starlink. Why deal with all the other problems?
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-11 19:37:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1999201997971681308
None of these statements are anything other than painfully obvious. The only questionable one is bitcoin, because if the fed takes a position on it as a stabilization vehicle then he’ll be wrong.
The BTC tech is weak for reasons we all understand. But a non-dilutable share in the economy that is also spendable is a pretty useful utility.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-03 20:11:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1996311302164357408
You are largely correct. There hasn’t been a reason for existence of insurance companies since we developed big data and competent actuarials. Now teeir exisence is irrelevant. The principle problem is ‘blame’ (or responsibility). Thats law. Law wont disappear, costs will collapse and volume increase to the limit of judicial and lawyer cognitive carrying capacity. (You should see what we are doing to get a case before the supreme court with a tiny staff replacing dozens of lawyers.)
Accounting will collapse into data entry. Finance and banking will collapse into extensions of the treasury. It will take almost twenty years but it will happen. But worse, how many clerical white collar jobs dominated by women will disappear? All of them.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-02 05:53:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1995733066166480921
Failure since 2000 to expand into computation.
Lower capital availability due to distributed markets.
Safety over opportunity.
Certainty over risk.
Legal prior restraint (regulation).
Bureaucratic load.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-27 22:29:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1994171767007359412
WHICH GAME?
What if exploration is the game for him while monetary returns are the game for you? Which is exactly why you pursue different objectives. All brains seek to maximize successful stimulation. Most successful stimulation is achieved by acquisition. Both of you are seeking to acquire something. But you value different outputs. If in exchange for spending every day researching and improving ideas is his reward, and the practical efforts of commercialization are not, then why do so? Mostly the issue is combining your execution and his ideas. But only if you have a shared goal of profiting from those ideas. That’s how most organizations flourish.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-26 22:35:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1993810758069837908
I have been thinking about this post on and off for a few hours. And I’m not sure I understand it. All evidence suggests that ethical behavior in business is a durable advantage and almost exclusively the domain of deca millionaires.
So success at any scale is achieved by ethical behavior. The unethical businesses are all the same and rely on asymmetric risk vs liability. Essentially gambling on up with government collusion and corruption the top of the hierarchy.
So there appears some premise in your question that is either misstated or contrary to the evidence.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-26 20:07:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1993773734046650698
Agreed. They are trying to stay in the game until a company that’s the real winner is determined by the market. Essentially it means they’re surrendering because they don’t feel competent to compete.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-24 18:14:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1993020329409888614
No this is exactly what *we* want. Neither of us is a majority set of users. The REVENUE that comes from you doesn’t cover their costs. It comes from paying customers especially corporations – which is who needs this feature. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-20 19:07:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1991584243219329032
You’re just practicing wishful thinking. All the incentive money and opportunity is doing nothing but expanding.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-11 18:56:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1988320033945292942