Curt Doolittle

Theme: Grammar

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/23333930_10155862946252264_30316962

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/23333930_10155862946252264_30316962

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/23333930_10155862946252264_3031696271668975324_o_10155862946252264.jpg Ok. I did it. Unfortunately, linguistics and logic use the term ‘mode’ rather than ‘dimension’ – the term that is used in all other fields. So correcting that term, and completing the hierarchy, we see this organization. And now we get to ‘wow’ people with the meaning of universal grammar and its relation to the physical, experiential, and imaginary dimensions of our reality.

    I have almost completed the data structure for language but I am not sure that this is a good investment of my time – since all I want to demonstrate is that all grammatical dimensions in all disciplines use different terms but mirror reality.

    From that point I can more easily demonstrate that operational grammar limits semantic and therefore dimensional content to the existential – and why.

    I was originally struggling because I was not separating the semantic (set of paradigms) in any langauge, from the dimensional grammars that can be constructed regardless of language, using different deflationary and inflationary grammars of universal grammar.

    Unfortunately we will have to wait for artificial intelligence to discover the metric we need for quantitative expression of these relations. Either that or some scientist will stumble on it by puzzling it enough. So just as we compare IQ to the center of the white distribution, we will compare the x-factor of universal grammar as a relationship between a 100IQ and our first general intelligence.Bill JoslinI suspected measurement and commensurability were going to be key.

    I’m now convinced that the universe is relational.

    Time – relation between changes in the state of affairs of the universe

    Space – positional relations of mass/matter

    Matter – constant relations of forces (persistent roperty of a relation) in proximity

    Phenomena – relations which occured constantly within set limits

    Operational language – centers language on relations, and measures of relations opposed to identity.

    Identity – boundaries (limits) where constant relations occur

    Math – nearly perfect relational language (models based on analogy of quantity and relationships of quantity.

    Blah blah blah

    A relational paradigm may provide commensurability between languages ( a meta measure of language and linguistic models) and a spectra from languages which afford the most explicit measure (accounting) of relations to the most obscure accounting for relations.Nov 07, 2017 11:12amCurt DoolittleyepNov 07, 2017 11:19amCurt Doolittle;)Nov 07, 2017 11:19amCurt Doolittlewhen I built the grammar-table it kind of freaked me out for a bit. Sort of de-humanizing in a way…..Nov 07, 2017 11:20amBill JoslinSpoken language couples to persception. Persception is a piss poor measure of relations (unless at personal human scale). Math couples to measure and is nearly perfect relational model but doesn’t couple to persception very well. Analogies and metaphors take a piss-poor measure (persception) and try to high light a relation, but in doing so further obscures measurement – it fakes commensurability.

    Then relying on coherence theories of truth (does the assertion cohere to experience) proclaims authority on universal truths – when it has actually taken steps away from measure and commensurability.Nov 07, 2017 11:28amTimo RohnerJust don’t follow Leibniz and his relationalism too long lest you don’t mind ending up with idealism. That’s where Leibniz arrived at some point.Nov 07, 2017 12:28pmBryan Nova Brey@[1255416290:2048:Blake Southwood] is a programmer tennis coach friend of mine with a pretty high IQ who will be blown away by this. He was working on a “plain language” programming language years ago. Looks like you cracked the code!

    Congrats dude.

    Atlas level effort!Nov 08, 2017 1:36amBlake SouthwoodIt’s a fun problem. It’s masking conplexity with simplicity with managed order. Semantics is taste and upbringing and is tainted by the first programming language someone is exposed too.

    Machine learning and expert systems using fuzzy logic with accumulating human knowledge, wisdom, information will prevail. It’s a Holy Grail problem that is a quest difficult to manage and represent in one dimension. For i sight read Chomsky Linguistics and Dijkstra’s Turing speech. Everything is mathematical and there is order in chaotic systems. Chaos theory is everywhere. Watson at IBM is fluent in 12 human languages now including all the hard ones. Hal is the wrong direction. An interface between man and code that is more palatable will be the bridge.

    The universe is unfathomable and incomprehensibly deep and vast.

    My question is where does the universe reside within and how does the gravity fabric of time and space have structure in a vaccume? As a friend of my brother told me that works at Space X the problem wuth languages is ambiguity and assumptions which is why the boolean logic level and sparce language keyword size and the syntax is cryptic due to tradition (and the mathematical evolution of coding) and to make compilers simpler to write. These were all constraints that were inherited thru the slow evolution of cs. The language I am designing is Strawberry based on Don Knuth’s Literate programming at Stanford.Nov 08, 2017 2:21amCurt DoolittleThe universe is entirely fathomable, the only problem being the discovery of constant relations across limits of prior sets of constant relations.

    I’m working on commensurability of speech in order to prevent various forms of fictionalism (deceit).

    Mathematics, as a system of positional names, provides scale independence (constant relations regardless of scale), but it’s dependent on commensurability.

    So the question is, how do we provide commensurability across paradigms where relations are not constant, and only intermediary phenomenon are constant.

    Logics have tried to do this but they are somewhat lost having nothing but internal consistency as a measure, just as mathematics has only scale independence, and constant relations in n-dimensions.

    Now, if we can develop the mathematics of operational symmetries ( what should emerge out of what today we call lie groups) then I think we have the kind of mathematics that we are looking for.

    But operations are algorithmic just as mathematics is operational in construction. The difference is that it mathematics can only describe the consequence of operations

    In other words, we have to have something to measure, and something commensurable to compare it to.Nov 08, 2017 12:28pmOk. I did it. Unfortunately, linguistics and logic use the term ‘mode’ rather than ‘dimension’ – the term that is used in all other fields. So correcting that term, and completing the hierarchy, we see this organization. And now we get to ‘wow’ people with the meaning of universal grammar and its relation to the physical, experiential, and imaginary dimensions of our reality.

    I have almost completed the data structure for language but I am not sure that this is a good investment of my time – since all I want to demonstrate is that all grammatical dimensions in all disciplines use different terms but mirror reality.

    From that point I can more easily demonstrate that operational grammar limits semantic and therefore dimensional content to the existential – and why.

    I was originally struggling because I was not separating the semantic (set of paradigms) in any langauge, from the dimensional grammars that can be constructed regardless of language, using different deflationary and inflationary grammars of universal grammar.

    Unfortunately we will have to wait for artificial intelligence to discover the metric we need for quantitative expression of these relations. Either that or some scientist will stumble on it by puzzling it enough. So just as we compare IQ to the center of the white distribution, we will compare the x-factor of universal grammar as a relationship between a 100IQ and our first general intelligence.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-07 10:38:00 UTC

  • To no small degree, aspiness assists heavily in developing excellence in propert

    To no small degree, aspiness assists heavily in developing excellence in propertarianism argument. Normies ‘average’ (synthesize) everything and do not see the details. Aspies see the world as consisting of details. Future lawyers in natural law will be heavily biased toward aspie personalities.

  • To no small degree, aspiness assists heavily in developing excellence in propert

    To no small degree, aspiness assists heavily in developing excellence in propertarianism argument. Normies ‘average’ (synthesize) everything and do not see the details. Aspies see the world as consisting of details.

    Future lawyers in natural law will be heavily biased toward aspie personalities.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-06 09:21:00 UTC

  • To no small degree, aspiness assists heavily in developing excellence in propert

    To no small degree, aspiness assists heavily in developing excellence in propertarianism argument. Normies ‘average’ (synthesize) everything and do not see the details. Aspies see the world as consisting of details. Future lawyers in natural law will be heavily biased toward aspie personalities.

  • Will You Understand Propertarianism?

    —“when your book comes out can you please make sure it’s not full of vacuous complex terminology that doesn’t mean anything. I want to read and understand it”— A Friend So let me ask you. Who is my audience? The people who already agree with me? The people who want to understand, explain, and defend the causes of the excellences of western civilization? The people who want to conduct arguments to defend it? The people who want to understand the constitution that we need to restore and preserve it? The people who want to understand how to construct natural law within that constitution? The people who want to debate other philosophers and intellectuals and prevent another intellectual attack on western civilization by various abrahamists? The people who want to understand what we need to do to win a civil war for our civilization? Or all of the above? Which of those are you? (a) You will never understand all of it – it will take me the rest of my life, and longer if I had it, to understand the implications myself. (b) Nothing I write is vacuous it’s just meaningless to you because you can’t use those parts of it – you don’t have the knowledge. (c) However you can use only those parts you understand. (d) Those parts you need to understand are simple enough to understand. HERE IS ALL YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND Seeking excellence(dominance), over emotion, mind, man, beast, nature, and the universe, western man invented the combination of technology, heroism, truth, agency and sovereignty in a semi professional voluntary militia regardless of the impact on the status hierarchy, and as a consequence, western man required reciprocity, and reciprocity requires markets in everything as the only possible means of cooperation. Markets calculate and adapt to change faster than all other social orders, and as such western man evolved faster than the rest, including, and especially because markets are eugenic, and western superiority is the result of eugenic distribution less burdened by the dead weight of the underclasses. However, we were defeated in the ancient world by the abrahamic lies, dysgenic reproduction and dysgenic immigration, and we are being defeated in the current age by abrahamic lies, dysgenic reproduction, and dysgenic immigration. In order to restore our civilization and defeat abrahamism, displacemet, and dysgenia we must only restore that natural law of reciprocity by the construction of a constitution of natural aw, and the restoration of the militia as the distributed dictatorship of natural law. The fundamental insight of my work is the completion of the scientific method and its application to all of human thought, thereby making it possible to prohibit abrahamic deception – in literary, financial forms, political, and religious forms, in this era and all of those that follow. And to license the use of violence to do so. Outlawing all those means by which the west was defeated in the ancient world and this one: not by violence, but by lies, financialization, immigration, and dysgenic devolution.

  • WILL YOU UNDERSTAND PROPERTARIANISM? —“when your book comes out can you please

    WILL YOU UNDERSTAND PROPERTARIANISM?

    —“when your book comes out can you please make sure it’s not full of vacuous complex terminology that doesn’t mean anything. I want to read and understand it”— A Friend

    So let me ask you.

    Who is my audience?

    The people who already agree with me?

    The people who want to understand, explain, and defend the causes of the excellences of western civilization?

    The people who want to conduct arguments to defend it?

    The people who want to understand the constitution that we need to restore and preserve it?

    The people who want to understand how to construct natural law within that constitution?

    The people who want to debate other philosophers and intellectuals and prevent another intellectual attack on western civilization by various abrahamists?

    The people who want to understand what we need to do to win a civil war for our civilization?

    Or all of the above?

    Which of those are you?

    (a) You will never understand all of it – it will take me the rest of my life, and longer if I had it, to understand the implications myself. (b) Nothing I write is vacuous it’s just meaningless to you because you can’t use those parts of it – you don’t have the knowledge. (c) However you can use only those parts you understand. (d) Those parts you need to understand are simple enough to understand.

    HERE IS ALL YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND

    Seeking excellence(dominance), over emotion, mind, man, beast, nature, and the universe, western man invented the combination of technology, heroism, truth, agency and sovereignty in a semi professional voluntary militia regardless of the impact on the status hierarchy, and as a consequence, western man required reciprocity, and reciprocity requires markets in everything as the only possible means of cooperation. Markets calculate and adapt to change faster than all other social orders, and as such western man evolved faster than the rest, including, and especially because markets are eugenic, and western superiority is the result of eugenic distribution less burdened by the dead weight of the underclasses. However, we were defeated in the ancient world by the abrahamic lies, dysgenic reproduction and dysgenic immigration, and we are being defeated in the current age by abrahamic lies, dysgenic reproduction, and dysgenic immigration. In order to restore our civilization and defeat abrahamism, displacemet, and dysgenia we must only restore that natural law of reciprocity by the construction of a constitution of natural aw, and the restoration of the militia as the distributed dictatorship of natural law.

    The fundamental insight of my work is the completion of the scientific method and its application to all of human thought, thereby making it possible to prohibit abrahamic deception – in literary, financial forms, political, and religious forms, in this era and all of those that follow.

    And to license the use of violence to do so. Outlawing all those means by which the west was defeated in the ancient world and this one: not by violence, but by lies, financialization, immigration, and dysgenic devolution.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-04 20:44:00 UTC

  • Will You Understand Propertarianism?

    —“when your book comes out can you please make sure it’s not full of vacuous complex terminology that doesn’t mean anything. I want to read and understand it”— A Friend So let me ask you. Who is my audience? The people who already agree with me? The people who want to understand, explain, and defend the causes of the excellences of western civilization? The people who want to conduct arguments to defend it? The people who want to understand the constitution that we need to restore and preserve it? The people who want to understand how to construct natural law within that constitution? The people who want to debate other philosophers and intellectuals and prevent another intellectual attack on western civilization by various abrahamists? The people who want to understand what we need to do to win a civil war for our civilization? Or all of the above? Which of those are you? (a) You will never understand all of it – it will take me the rest of my life, and longer if I had it, to understand the implications myself. (b) Nothing I write is vacuous it’s just meaningless to you because you can’t use those parts of it – you don’t have the knowledge. (c) However you can use only those parts you understand. (d) Those parts you need to understand are simple enough to understand. HERE IS ALL YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND Seeking excellence(dominance), over emotion, mind, man, beast, nature, and the universe, western man invented the combination of technology, heroism, truth, agency and sovereignty in a semi professional voluntary militia regardless of the impact on the status hierarchy, and as a consequence, western man required reciprocity, and reciprocity requires markets in everything as the only possible means of cooperation. Markets calculate and adapt to change faster than all other social orders, and as such western man evolved faster than the rest, including, and especially because markets are eugenic, and western superiority is the result of eugenic distribution less burdened by the dead weight of the underclasses. However, we were defeated in the ancient world by the abrahamic lies, dysgenic reproduction and dysgenic immigration, and we are being defeated in the current age by abrahamic lies, dysgenic reproduction, and dysgenic immigration. In order to restore our civilization and defeat abrahamism, displacemet, and dysgenia we must only restore that natural law of reciprocity by the construction of a constitution of natural aw, and the restoration of the militia as the distributed dictatorship of natural law. The fundamental insight of my work is the completion of the scientific method and its application to all of human thought, thereby making it possible to prohibit abrahamic deception – in literary, financial forms, political, and religious forms, in this era and all of those that follow. And to license the use of violence to do so. Outlawing all those means by which the west was defeated in the ancient world and this one: not by violence, but by lies, financialization, immigration, and dysgenic devolution.
  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/23213488_10155855480282264_67560915

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/23213488_10155855480282264_67560915

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/23213488_10155855480282264_6756091529797878533_o_10155855480282264.jpg TABLE OF DISCOURSE GOALSTABLE OF DISCOURSE GOALS

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-04 12:52:00 UTC

  • Animal Language?

    —“What do believe is the qualitative difference between human and animal language?”—Bob Robertson  As far as I know animals do not possess language, it only exists within humans. All other creatures merely manage to communicate. Charles Hockett (1967) introduced a generally accepted check list for language, a set of features that all human languages possess. His seven key properties are: 1 – productivity (the ability to create and understand new utterances): system which makes it possible to construct an unlimited number of sentences from a limited set of rules. 2 – arbitrariness (when signs/words do not resemble the things they represent), 3 – displacement (the ability to refer to the past and to things not present), and 4 – duality of pattern (the combination of a phonological system and a grammatical system), 5 – interchangeability (the ability to transmit and to receive messages by exchanging roles), 6 – specialization (when the only function of speech is communication and the speaker does not act out his message), 7 – cultural transmission (the ability to teach/learn from other individuals, e.g. by imitation). As far as I know the reason humans can speak is simply brain size and complexity (long chains). But I won’t go into all of it here. But the ability to imagine futures, imagine stories, ‘self-observe’ and describe those stories in a series of symbols, using a series of rules’ takes a great deal of processing power. While we can see elements of these patterns in parrots, corvids, dolphins, and the apes, we must teach them, and they say very simple things – because they only think very simple things. Assuming we selected and trained enough chimpanzees to use sign language to build a self sustaining community of them, and assuming we could leave them on an island for a few centuries, it’s possible that sign language would persist. I suspect the problem is that it’s hard to produce a community of chimps with the intelligence necessary for perpetuation.

  • Animal Language?

    —“What do believe is the qualitative difference between human and animal language?”—Bob Robertson  As far as I know animals do not possess language, it only exists within humans. All other creatures merely manage to communicate. Charles Hockett (1967) introduced a generally accepted check list for language, a set of features that all human languages possess. His seven key properties are: 1 – productivity (the ability to create and understand new utterances): system which makes it possible to construct an unlimited number of sentences from a limited set of rules. 2 – arbitrariness (when signs/words do not resemble the things they represent), 3 – displacement (the ability to refer to the past and to things not present), and 4 – duality of pattern (the combination of a phonological system and a grammatical system), 5 – interchangeability (the ability to transmit and to receive messages by exchanging roles), 6 – specialization (when the only function of speech is communication and the speaker does not act out his message), 7 – cultural transmission (the ability to teach/learn from other individuals, e.g. by imitation). As far as I know the reason humans can speak is simply brain size and complexity (long chains). But I won’t go into all of it here. But the ability to imagine futures, imagine stories, ‘self-observe’ and describe those stories in a series of symbols, using a series of rules’ takes a great deal of processing power. While we can see elements of these patterns in parrots, corvids, dolphins, and the apes, we must teach them, and they say very simple things – because they only think very simple things. Assuming we selected and trained enough chimpanzees to use sign language to build a self sustaining community of them, and assuming we could leave them on an island for a few centuries, it’s possible that sign language would persist. I suspect the problem is that it’s hard to produce a community of chimps with the intelligence necessary for perpetuation.