Curt Doolittle

Theme: Grammar

  • Um. Aristotle, Confucius, Plato, Socrates, Lao Tzu,Abraham. That order is meanin

    Um. Aristotle, Confucius, Plato, Socrates, Lao Tzu,Abraham.

    That order is meaningful. What grammars does each depend upon?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 10:58:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050339755806912512

  • Um. Aristotle, Confucius, Plato, Socrates, Lao Tzu,Abraham. That order is meanin

    Um. Aristotle, Confucius, Plato, Socrates, Lao Tzu,Abraham.

    That order is meaningful. What grammars does each depend upon?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 06:57:00 UTC

  • ALL SPEECH IS MEASUREMENT, ALL STATEMENTS TRANSACTIONS. BUT MEASUREMENT OF WHAT?

    ALL SPEECH IS MEASUREMENT, ALL STATEMENTS TRANSACTIONS. BUT MEASUREMENT OF WHAT?

    You know, the material universe seemed complicated until we discovered the atomic structure and created the periodic table of the elements.

    The same is true for the Grammars. Once you understand the grammars, all speech is as open to inspection and comprehension on its structure alone.

    Once you understand that we can produce only one parsimonious consistent and correspondent frame: operations, that provides universal commensurability, you understand why all frames like all theories, like stories, are weak analogies, self delusions, or frauds.

    There is only one ‘way of thinking’ (frame) that consists of truth, and an infinite number of frames that are weak, delusional or fraudulent.

    Why? because we evolved to negotiate, not to speak the truth. We must learn to speak the truth as a means of calculation, just as we must learn to calculate using every OTHER method of calculation.

    This is why postmodernism and every other disciplinary, cult, ideological, and private vocabulary is just fraud at some degree of scale.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 06:52:00 UTC

  • My first day in Law class, the 83 year old professor walked in with a volume of

    My first day in Law class, the 83 year old professor walked in with a volume of the OED, and taught us the etymology of the word “NIce”.

    This was how he introduced the problem of the interpretation of the Law.

    My world was forever changed. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 23:27:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050166021800243200

  • ETYMOLOGY AND THE LAW My first day in Law class, the 83 year old professor walke

    ETYMOLOGY AND THE LAW

    My first day in Law class, the 83 year old professor walked in with a volume of the OED, and taught us the etymology of the word “NIce”.

    This was how he introduced the problem of the interpretation of the Law.

    My world was forever changed. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 19:27:00 UTC

  • Etymology and The Law

    October 10th, 2018 7:27 PM ETYMOLOGY AND THE LAW

    My first day in Law class, the 83 year old professor walked in with a volume of the OED, and taught us the etymology of the word “NIce”. This was how he introduced the problem of the interpretation of the Law. My world was forever changed. ๐Ÿ˜‰

  • Etymology and The Law

    October 10th, 2018 7:27 PM ETYMOLOGY AND THE LAW

    My first day in Law class, the 83 year old professor walked in with a volume of the OED, and taught us the etymology of the word “NIce”. This was how he introduced the problem of the interpretation of the Law. My world was forever changed. ๐Ÿ˜‰

  • 2) Each social order (Wisdom literature), whether legal(western), rational(chine

    2) Each social order (Wisdom literature), whether legal(western), rational(chinese) theological(Semitic), or literary(Indian), relies on criteria of decidability and method of argument in support those criteria.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 15:02:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050038971869396992

    Reply addressees: @weltmord

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050034352137129984

    IN REPLY TO:

    @weltmord

    @curtdoolittle None of these three ideologies has anything to do with abrahamic religions.

    THE DOOLITTLE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND HE IS WRITING HIMSELF INTO NOT EVEN A SHALLOW BUT UNSUBSTANTIAL CRITIQUE OF RELIGION

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050034352137129984

  • “Could we come up with a better term than โ€œtribalismโ€ please?”— Marginal Revol

    —“Could we come up with a better term than โ€œtribalismโ€ please?”— Marginal Revolution

    <Critical Rant=ON>

    OMG…..

    How about we use operational (scientific language) instead of postmodern (pseudoscientific language)? I mean, is economics a science or a pseudoscience?

    The world doesn’t need more sophisms.

    |PACK| Family > Kin > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Civilization > Race = Markets for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law, trade policy ameliorating differences in purchasing power), producing universal EUGENIC reproduction.

    –versus–

    |HERD| Individual > Corporation > Universalism = NO MARKETS for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law), instead involuntary transfers between groups producing UNIVERSAL DYSGENIC REPRODUCTION.

    Economics if anything consists of the full accounting of costs. NOT THE CHERRY PICKING OF RETURNS INDEPENDENT OF COSTS.

    I don’t make mistakes such as these. The reason is that I don’t engage in cherry-picking (Pseudoscience) Justificationism (sophism) and Postmodern (denial and deceit) “empty verbalism” for the purpose of producing frames that perpetuate the frauds of involuntary transfer, and the spread of dysgenia.

    Simple facts: those groups that practiced eugenic reproduction under manorialism (east and west) succeeded precisely because of those eugenics, and those that did not, and still do not, are those that struggle.

    And those that were sold the false promise of universalism whether in the ancient world (the Abrahamic Dark Age and the destruction of all great civilizations of the ancient world), and in the Modern world (marxist-libertarian-postmodern-feminist destruction of the modern world) but lacked the reserve capital (europe, east asia), were sufficiently distracted by the false promise of pseudoscientific sophism, that they have missed the window for using the industrial and technological revolution to organize their societies for eugenic middle class reproduction.

    Reductive Explanation: The HERD (Universalist) doesn’t know it’s a HERD, but the PACK (Nationalist) knows it’s a pack, and the herd a herd.

    Selective use of economics to justify an instinct is just pseudoscience. Either you engage in full accounting or you don’t.

    <Critical Rant=Off/>

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 09:50:00 UTC

  • THE FINAL WORD ON ONTOLOGY vs PARADIGM AND FRAME. Ontology is used in subjective

    THE FINAL WORD ON ONTOLOGY vs PARADIGM AND FRAME.

    Ontology is used in subjective (experiential) and objective (testimonial) contexts to refer to a hierarchy of categories in a paradigm (network) of constant relations between existence perception cognition speech, and the service of speech in recreating the experience (loaded and inflated) or testimony (unloaded and deflated).

    .

    In the Continental Tradition (Literary, Platonic) sense it can include Experiential Categories (Phenomenalism for example), and in the Anglo Tradition (Science, Accounting, and Law), it cannot include experiential categories (imaginary, ideal, cognitive, emotive, pseudo-physical biases) as a defense against biases and their arbitrariness: inconstant, loaded, framed, fictionalized, idealized, relations between the universe and our descriptions of it.

    Being, and Ontology are currently “archaic”, and we use scientific categories instead: Paradigm. Paradigms are constructed of a network of theories, from terms to narratives; and we acknowledge that Paradigms (search for consistency correspondence possibility and parsimony) and Frames (loading, framing, suggesting, overloading) are both used by us in our speech.

    So we end up with (Ontology(conflationary)) vs ((Paradigm(measurement) and Frame(experience)) (deflationary))

    Note below that “Being” and “Ontology” both describe this spectrum of subjective to objective. So when one uses the term Ontology, one can refer to literary-subjective-loaded-framed-arbitrary, or scientific-objective-deflated-correspondent.

    GRAMMATICAL DEFLATION (ontology of speech)

    SUPERNATURAL: Occult (religion, emotion) > IDEAL: Verbalism (Philosophical Rationalism, imagination) > REAL: Scientific (Testimonial, measurement).

    beยทing [หˆbฤ“iNG] NOUN

    1. existence.

    “the railroad brought many towns into being” ยท [more]

    synonyms:

    existence ยท living ยท life ยท animation ยท animateness ยท aliveness ยท reality ยท actuality ยท essential nature ยท lifeblood ยท vital force ยท entity ยท esse

    2. the nature or essence of a person.

    “sometimes one aspect of our being has been developed at the expense of the others”

    synonyms:

    soul ยท spirit ยท nature ยท essence ยท substance ยท entity ยท inner being ยท inner self ยท psyche ยท heart ยท bosom ยท breast ยท core ยท kernel ยท marrow ยท quiddity ยท pneuma

    3. a real or imaginary living creature or entity, especially an intelligent one.

    “alien beings” ยท

    synonyms:

    creature ยท life form ยท living entity ยท living thing ยท living soul ยท soul ยท individual ยท person ยท personage ยท human being ยท human ยท man ยท woman ยท life ยท existence ยท earthling

    onยทtolยทoยทgy [รคnหˆtรคlษ™jฤ“] NOUN

    1. the branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being.

    2. a set of concepts and categories in a subject area or domain that shows their properties and the relations between them.

    “what’s new about our ontology is that it is created automatically from large datasets” ยท “we’re using ontologies to capture and analyze some of the knowledge in our department”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 08:11:00 UTC