Theme: Grammar

  • IMO: this is because we have failed to produce a value neutral science (vocabula

    IMO: this is because we have failed to produce a value neutral science (vocabulary) of cooperation, and freud, boaz and marx dug a rhetorical hole we haven’t (yet) dug out of.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-20 00:47:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053447612525932544

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt @kaidi_wu

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053302159993913344


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053302159993913344

  • ON RUSSELL KIRK AND THE “LITERARY” CONSERVATIVES I’ll be less kind. Poetics do n

    ON RUSSELL KIRK AND THE “LITERARY” CONSERVATIVES

    I’ll be less kind. Poetics do nothing more than provide sentimental medication for those who are of like mind, but wanting others to act, unwilling to act, and failing to act, because the poet provides only sedation not a recipe for action. The west begins and ends with the militia and rule of law between the peerage of men of the militia, and that militia’s willingness to use violence to deny power to any but the militia, with the monarch as the judge and general of last resort. Kirk was the end of the line of those who sold aristocratic egalitarianism (paternalistic, sky worshipping, militaristic, expansionist, empirical, technological, militia) in christian robes. And he was the greatest example of the conservative (aristocratic) postware failure to out-nice the anti-national-socialists-facists (marxists, communists, socialists), instead of restore the pre-war innovations of poincare, maxwell, darwin, menger, spencer, nietzsche, and the romanticist movement to restore western civilization to its ancestral (ancient) origins. So understanding the essayists as a catastrophic failure that allowed the destruction of our civilization – and that it was the genetics, magnetic imaging, cognitive science, and pharmaceutical industry that refuted the ant-darwinian socialist pseudosciences. Either you have the will to fight to rule as a means of preventing alternative rule, or you are merely seeking medication to sedate yourself while being decimated, culture-cided, civilization-cided, and genocided.

    We are the people of The Real: Reciprocity, Law, Duty, Truth, reason, technology, science, and WAR. Either we fight to preserve it or we die having failed to.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-19 09:16:00 UTC

  • THE SPECTRUM OF INTERPRETABILITY (ERROR) Thus the problem of literature vs philo

    THE SPECTRUM OF INTERPRETABILITY (ERROR)

    Thus the problem of literature vs philosophy, vs science vs mathematics : a decline in ‘interpretation’ due to the increasing precision of the vocabulary and grammar.

    Unfortunately humnans (children) are most accessible and suggestible at the left of that scale, and least suggestible but least accessible at the right.

    || LIterary analogy > rational philosophy > economics > cognitive science > physics > mathematics.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-19 07:28:00 UTC

  • I Use “Grammars”…

    October 18th, 2018 1:24 PM I USE “GRAMMARS” (EVERYTHING) RATHER THAN LANGUAGE (VOCABULARY) BUT, YES.

    —“In other words, neurological operations still utilize a framework of object interactions which fundamentally constitutes that which qualifies as language. This doesn’t refer to orally spoken language but it can theoretically be described and articulated when we are not ignorant”—George Perceval

    I use the terms ‘grammars‘ rather than language because that’s the correct term, but by analogy, yes.

  • Archetypes(Myth), MBTI (Literature), BIG5 (Philosophy), Propertarianism (logic)

    October 18th, 2018 10:28 AM SCALE: ARCHETYPES(Myth), MBTI (Literature), BIG5 (Philosophy), PROPERTARIANISM (logic)

    Think of MBTI as LIterature, and BIG5 as Philosophy, and Propertarianism as Logic: Graceful increase and decrease in precision according to the ability of the individual: SATISFACTION OF THE MARKETS FOR COMPREHENSION.

  • I Use “Grammars”…

    October 18th, 2018 1:24 PM I USE “GRAMMARS” (EVERYTHING) RATHER THAN LANGUAGE (VOCABULARY) BUT, YES.

    —“In other words, neurological operations still utilize a framework of object interactions which fundamentally constitutes that which qualifies as language. This doesn’t refer to orally spoken language but it can theoretically be described and articulated when we are not ignorant”—George Perceval

    I use the terms ‘grammars‘ rather than language because that’s the correct term, but by analogy, yes.

  • Archetypes(Myth), MBTI (Literature), BIG5 (Philosophy), Propertarianism (logic)

    October 18th, 2018 10:28 AM SCALE: ARCHETYPES(Myth), MBTI (Literature), BIG5 (Philosophy), PROPERTARIANISM (logic)

    Think of MBTI as LIterature, and BIG5 as Philosophy, and Propertarianism as Logic: Graceful increase and decrease in precision according to the ability of the individual: SATISFACTION OF THE MARKETS FOR COMPREHENSION.

  • THE PURPOSE OF CONSERVATIVE HYPERBOLE The purpose of hyperbole is to scale the i

    THE PURPOSE OF CONSERVATIVE HYPERBOLE

    The purpose of hyperbole is to scale the idea. Hyperbole is how conservatives test (illustrate) the Kantian Categorical Imperative: “What if Everyone Did That?”

    Everything is simple.
    😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 13:38:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052916775208345601

  • I USE “GRAMMARS” (EVERYTHING) RATHER THAN LANGUAGE (VOCABULARY) BUT, YES. —“In

    I USE “GRAMMARS” (EVERYTHING) RATHER THAN LANGUAGE (VOCABULARY) BUT, YES.

    —“In other words, neurological operations still utilize a framework of object interactions which fundamentally constitutes that which qualifies as language. This doesn’t refer to orally spoken language but it can theoretically be described and articulated when we are not ignorant”—George Perceval

    I use the terms ‘grammars’ rather than language because that’s the correct term, but by analogy, yes.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 13:24:00 UTC

  • SCALE: ARCHETYPES(Myth), MBTI (Literature), BIG5 (Philosophy), PROPERTARIANISM (

    SCALE: ARCHETYPES(Myth), MBTI (Literature), BIG5 (Philosophy), PROPERTARIANISM (logic)

    Think of MBTI as LIterature, and BIG5 as Philosophy, and Propertarianism as Logic: Graceful increase and decrease in precision according to the ability of the individual: SATISFACTION OF THE MARKETS FOR COMPREHENSION.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 10:28:00 UTC