Curt Doolittle

Theme: Grammar

  • THE GRAMMARS AND THEIR FRAMES (important) Theology readers, vs philosophy reader

    THE GRAMMARS AND THEIR FRAMES

    (important)

    Theology readers, vs philosophy readers, vs literature readers, vs historians, vs biologists, vvs jurists, s economists, vs physicist, vs programmers, vs mathematicians.

    Teach: Arts, Technologies, Economies, Laws, and Wars.

    In other words DEMONSTRATED history, not REPORTED history. Or stated differently, theology, philosophy, literature, and history, are just as vulnerable to REPORTING BIAS as are the pseudosciences of metaphysics, psychology, sociology, and ‘political science’.

    What’s the difference, and why have the pseudosciences (reportings) of the written word been so damaging compared to the law, sciences, logics, and mathematics?

    Lack of agency.

    Utility of coercion.

    Utility of deceit.

    -Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-04 09:47:00 UTC

  • GRAMMARS OF CIVILIZATIONS TELL US ALL WE NEED TO KNOW Um. Sorry. But it’s not op

    GRAMMARS OF CIVILIZATIONS TELL US ALL WE NEED TO KNOW

    Um. Sorry. But it’s not open do debate.

    1 – Aristotle Wrote Proto Empiricism: Reason, Naturalism, Proto-empiricism, Law, Calculation. (TRUTH)

    2 – Sun Tzu, and Confucius wrote WISDOM LIT. Lao Tzu crossed the line into the questionable. (WISDOM)

    3 – The Indians wrote both mythology and wisdom literature, bordering on political science (WISDOM)

    4 – The Persians wrote supernormal and supernatural wisdom literature. (UTOPIAN UNIVERSALISM)

    5 – The Egyptians wrote RITUALISM Supernatural (Animism, Anthropomorphism, heathenism ) Doctrine and Ritual.

    6 – The Abrahamists wrote Mythology, Rebellion, and Lie and Destruction of all of the above. (UTOPIAN LIE)

    Abrahamism is a cancer upon mankind.

    ABRAHAMISM: False Promise (lie) > Mythology (lie/False History) > Pilpul(Positiva, Justificationism) > Critique(Negativa, Straw Man) > Supernaturalism, Sophism, Pseudoscience.

    The west fights between the best Aristotle and Law, and the worst Abrahamism and Lies.

    Only the Far East is staged to survive the cancer.

    The answer?

    THE WHITE LAW

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-02 12:01:00 UTC

  • Close, but It’s Not Math, but Algorithmic

    CLOSE, BUT IT”S NOT JUST MATH, BUT ALGORITHMIC (OPERATIONAL).

    —“My sense is that Curt is more mathematically and scientifically oriented than he is literarily oriented. His syntax is almost algebraic at times.”— Joel Harvey

    That’s correct. I actually write in programmatic statements just like we write software. So

    |PARADIGMS(GRAMMARS)| Fictional (inflationary) > Literary(Meaningful) > testimonial(descriptive) > Algorithmic (programmatic, operations) > Scientific (correlative, statistical) > Logical (sets) > Mathematical (units).

    In fact, my writing looks almost identical to my pseudocode. I was taught in the era where we wrote pseudocode (outline in english) first to think through the logic, and in doing so write documentation, then to write the code itself (transactions). So yes, that is why you see what you see. And it is why I understood the possibility of algorithmic language of law…. So there you go. Like I said. The reason I was able to complete Hayek’s program i is because I was born AFTER Turing and hayek was born BEFORE Turing. Now if I could just explain to all Austrians that austrian econ is the LAW of Economics rather than economics proper, they would understand both their discipline and what I have done with it.

  • Close, but It’s Not Math, but Algorithmic

    CLOSE, BUT IT”S NOT JUST MATH, BUT ALGORITHMIC (OPERATIONAL).

    —“My sense is that Curt is more mathematically and scientifically oriented than he is literarily oriented. His syntax is almost algebraic at times.”— Joel Harvey

    That’s correct. I actually write in programmatic statements just like we write software. So

    |PARADIGMS(GRAMMARS)| Fictional (inflationary) > Literary(Meaningful) > testimonial(descriptive) > Algorithmic (programmatic, operations) > Scientific (correlative, statistical) > Logical (sets) > Mathematical (units).

    In fact, my writing looks almost identical to my pseudocode. I was taught in the era where we wrote pseudocode (outline in english) first to think through the logic, and in doing so write documentation, then to write the code itself (transactions). So yes, that is why you see what you see. And it is why I understood the possibility of algorithmic language of law…. So there you go. Like I said. The reason I was able to complete Hayek’s program i is because I was born AFTER Turing and hayek was born BEFORE Turing. Now if I could just explain to all Austrians that austrian econ is the LAW of Economics rather than economics proper, they would understand both their discipline and what I have done with it.

  • Your choice of grammar (paradigm) tells us how you understand yourself in relati

    Your choice of grammar (paradigm) tells us how you understand yourself in relation to others.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-30 19:14:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1068584164641918976

  • “Personally I think a semantically commensurable language creates a problem of c

    —“Personally I think a semantically commensurable language creates a problem of cost, but alas we must bear costs.”—Micah Pezdirtz

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-30 18:01:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1068565698643980289

  • “If your speech does not satisfy the categories necessary to demonstrate due dil

    —“If your speech does not satisfy the categories necessary to demonstrate due diligence or establish warrantee against fraud, bias, or error, why on earth would I take you seriously?”—Micah Pezdirtz

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-30 14:41:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1068515483136270341

  • “Metaphor: low resolution vs. E-prime: high resolution”—Micah Pezdirtz

    —“Metaphor: low resolution vs. E-prime: high resolution”—Micah Pezdirtz

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-30 14:32:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1068513181214171136

  • Your choice of grammar (paradigm) tells us how you understand yourself in relati

    Your choice of grammar (paradigm) tells us how you understand yourself in relation to others.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-30 14:14:00 UTC

  • “One of my philosophy professors said, it’s not that you can’t use analogy and m

    —“One of my philosophy professors said, it’s not that you can’t use analogy and metaphor to express some difficult ideas, but eventually you have to actually tell us what you MEAN. We will insist on that point.”—Daniel Roland Anderson

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-30 14:01:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1068505414046793728