Theme: Grammar

  • 3) But that does not mean that we cannot test statements. We can. 4) And mathema

    3) But that does not mean that we cannot test statements. We can. 4) And mathematical grammar is still dependent upon axiomatic declaration while the universe at some point (or at least this instance of it) is not axiomatic (declarative) but theoretic (existential).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 18:49:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071839353612185601

    Reply addressees: @RaduBT

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071791089651208195


    IN REPLY TO:

    @RaduBT

    @curtdoolittle Math is not complete (Godel theorems – he proved that for any axiomatic system). It would have to do that with tools from “inside” an axiomatic system. The only way not to deceive ourselves is to rely on Physics, as in Universe / Experiment. Any theory is just an hypothesis. https://t.co/F8trNGXKtx

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071791089651208195

  • 2) … language regardless of dimensions, there is no closure or completeness (l

    2) … language regardless of dimensions, there is no closure or completeness (language is always infinitely open to reorganization). Just as there is no end to what we can speak of in ordinary language. Language expression like neurological organization is infinite.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 18:48:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071839027777691649

    Reply addressees: @RaduBT

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071791089651208195


    IN REPLY TO:

    @RaduBT

    @curtdoolittle Math is not complete (Godel theorems – he proved that for any axiomatic system). It would have to do that with tools from “inside” an axiomatic system. The only way not to deceive ourselves is to rely on Physics, as in Universe / Experiment. Any theory is just an hypothesis. https://t.co/F8trNGXKtx

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071791089651208195

  • Completeness and closure are two concepts I understand. But it is simpler to sta

    Completeness and closure are two concepts I understand. But it is simpler to state that mathematics is a very simple language of one dimension: positional relations. And as a one dimensional language of positional relations it maintains perfect constant relations. but like any…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 18:46:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071838613615374337

    Reply addressees: @RaduBT

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071791089651208195


    IN REPLY TO:

    @RaduBT

    @curtdoolittle Math is not complete (Godel theorems – he proved that for any axiomatic system). It would have to do that with tools from “inside” an axiomatic system. The only way not to deceive ourselves is to rely on Physics, as in Universe / Experiment. Any theory is just an hypothesis. https://t.co/F8trNGXKtx

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071791089651208195

  • So if i tell you its not a history but a list of methods, and that Idealism belo

    So if i tell you its not a history but a list of methods, and that Idealism belongs directly before Rational Philosophy, then where would Reason go? And if i say math is a logic, not a science, how would you respond?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 20:57:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071509187333685253

    Reply addressees: @ColumbianEmpire

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071468378181709824


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071468378181709824

  • (HINT: What I am doing is teaching you how to deflate that form of law, educatio

    (HINT: What I am doing is teaching you how to deflate that form of law, education, and indoctrination we call religion into constituent parts, and therefore give you the vocabulary to discuss it as operations rather than ideals.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 18:09:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071466722392244224

  • STYLE GUIDE: ATTRIBUTIONS “by” = Written by “h/t” = Forwarded, Recommended by “v

    STYLE GUIDE: ATTRIBUTIONS

    “by” = Written by

    “h/t” = Forwarded, Recommended by

    “via” = Published on site, page, whatever…

    —“quote”—Author being quoted

    —myquote—Current Author

    So:

    THIS IS THE TITLE

    by John Doe, via His Web Site, h/t Mary Roe

    this_is_a_link





    ( FILE UNDER: FORMATTING OF POSTS )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 10:06:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47577570_10156829283012264_269769000

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47577570_10156829283012264_2697690003957350400_o_10156829283007264.jpg Q:CURT: WHY THE SERIES OF TERMS?

    (LESSON)Jarrod MarmaNot gonna claim that I “got it” but I just figured it was possible synonyms or word associations of sortsDec 6, 2018, 9:05 PMGreg HamiltonI certainly don’t know your system nor your language at any level of mastery, but I always know thats on me because I haven’t done the work.

    The time a man should ask questions is when he’s doing the work and stuck and needs helps making the next step.

    If he hasn’t exhausted his own efforts he should generally be quiet and keep working at it. (and keep his ears open)Dec 6, 2018, 9:07 PMCurt DoolittleYou are at the high end of the competence and confidence spectrum. What I need to work with someone is intellectual honesty and at least some ability so that there are returns on my labor. some guys just want to be able to understand and identify those that are competent and confident so that they can work with and follow them. We don’t need everyone a general.. lolDec 6, 2018, 9:47 PMAlex CastoHi Curt, why do you make the best posts of anyone on the so called right all day everyday? I can’t understand.Dec 6, 2018, 9:55 PMCurt DoolittleChronic OCD, Accumulated Knowledge because of it, Absurd effort few can afford, Endless Love of my People, and lots of practice… lolDec 6, 2018, 9:59 PMCurt DoolittleSorry… just had to run with your lead in… -hugs lolDec 6, 2018, 9:59 PMGreg HamiltonROI is important. There are only so many hours in the day and time is the most precious resource.Dec 6, 2018, 10:02 PMAlex CastoGood on you Sir. Everything takes works. Some people are just lazy.Dec 6, 2018, 10:03 PMGreg HamiltonOh and thanks, I’ll take my compliments when I can get them.Dec 6, 2018, 10:29 PMQ:CURT: WHY THE SERIES OF TERMS?

    (LESSON)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-06 21:01:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47577570_10156829283012264_269769000

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47577570_10156829283012264_2697690003957350400_o_10156829283007264.jpg Q:CURT: WHY THE SERIES OF TERMS?

    (LESSON)Jarrod MarmaNot gonna claim that I “got it” but I just figured it was possible synonyms or word associations of sortsDec 6, 2018, 9:05 PMGreg HamiltonI certainly don’t know your system nor your language at any level of mastery, but I always know thats on me because I haven’t done the work.

    The time a man should ask questions is when he’s doing the work and stuck and needs helps making the next step.

    If he hasn’t exhausted his own efforts he should generally be quiet and keep working at it. (and keep his ears open)Dec 6, 2018, 9:07 PMDann HopkinsI mean you could just put a little “->” between terms to avoid being cryptic but fairDec 6, 2018, 9:12 PMCurt Doolittlelol.. love you man. ;)Dec 6, 2018, 9:45 PMCurt DoolittleYou are at the high end of the competence and confidence spectrum. What I need to work with someone is intellectual honesty and at least some ability so that there are returns on my labor. some guys just want to be able to understand and identify those that are competent and confident so that they can work with and follow them. We don’t need everyone a general.. lolDec 6, 2018, 9:47 PMAlex CastoHi Curt, why do you make the best posts of anyone on the so called right all day everyday? I can’t understand.Dec 6, 2018, 9:55 PMCurt DoolittleChronic OCD, Accumulated Knowledge because of it, Absurd effort few can afford, Endless Love of my People, and lots of practice… lolDec 6, 2018, 9:59 PMCurt DoolittleSorry… just had to run with your lead in… -hugs lolDec 6, 2018, 9:59 PMGreg HamiltonROI is important. There are only so many hours in the day and time is the most precious resource.Dec 6, 2018, 10:02 PMAlex CastoGood on you Sir. Everything takes works. Some people are just lazy.Dec 6, 2018, 10:03 PMGreg HamiltonOh and thanks, I’ll take my compliments when I can get them.Dec 6, 2018, 10:29 PMQ:CURT: WHY THE SERIES OF TERMS?

    (LESSON)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-06 21:01:00 UTC

  • THE GRAMMARS OF TRUTH AND DECEIT (worth repeating) … 7) |TRUTHFUL GRAMMARS OF

    THE GRAMMARS OF TRUTH AND DECEIT

    (worth repeating)



    7) |TRUTHFUL GRAMMARS OF EXPRESSION| Math, Logic, Science, Operations(protocols, processes, recipes), Economics (money, banking, finance, accounting), Law (Natural), History, Literature (including poetry > essay > fiction > mythology).

    8) |DECEIT| failure of due diligence > ignorance > error > bias > wishful thinking > loading > framing > suggestion > obscurantism > fictionalism > denialism > and deceit.

    9) |FICTIONALISMS| Deceit > Sophism > Pseudoscience > Supernaturalism.

    10) |AVOIDANCE| Disapproval > shaming > moralizing > psychologizing > ridicule >rallying > gossiping > undermining > and reputation-destruction. “DSRRGUR”.

    11) |ABRAHAMIC GRAMMARS|: Disapproval as substitute for argument > False Promise > Pilpul (sophism) > Critique () > Heaping of Undue Praise, Straw Man Criticism as a Vehicle for Disapproval > Reputation Destruction > Failure to Supply a Competing alternative capable of surviving same criticisms > Authoritarian Conformity,

    12) |ABRAHAMIC EVOLUTION| Abrahamism > (Adding Platonism) > Judaism > Christianity > Islam > (Dark Age Theology) > Marxism > Postmodernism > Feminism > Denialism: “APMPFD”.

    13) |LONG CYCLE OF HISTORY| {MALE EVOLUTIONARY TERRITORIAL: Fast Scientific Western > Medium Rational Eastern > Slow Narrative Indian Indian} vs FEMALE DEVOLUTIONARY MIGRATORY: Supernatural Semitic counter-evolutionary strategy. With Africa, Americas and Pacifica Lagging, and (it appears) Australian-NZ regressing.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-05 02:50:00 UTC

  • “Q:CURT, WHAT ARE LOADING AND FRAMING?”— LOADING: Inserting or removing value

    —“Q:CURT, WHAT ARE LOADING AND FRAMING?”—

    LOADING: Inserting or removing value judgements, emotions, approval and disapproval, into an argument where they merely obscure the truth.

    FRAMING: Inserting or removing narrative into the content to imply motives, incentives, intentions, other than those that exist.

    You should know these two tactics as well as substituting disapproval or approval for argument, as well as all the logical fallacies, and the memory, social, and cognitive biases.

    If you do not understand these things you are an amateur that needs to maybe study logic and rhetoric, and perhaps the list of ideologies.

    See http://retawprojects.com/uploads/politics-ideologies.pdf


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-04 12:42:00 UTC