Theme: Grammar

VISIONS OF THE FUTURE

I don’t have anything against other groups because I understand men speak by and act by different grammars and that those grammars reflect their genes, class, and region – so they have little choice. But reciprocity rules.

There is no value in trying to get despotic absolutists, the religious absolutists, the legal absolutists, the classical liberals, the libertarians, and the anarcho capitalists to unite behind a single message or goal other than survival as a group.

The reality is that we need authority, religion, law, government, entrepreneurs, investors, and artists. And these demands are supplied by each of the right’s groups. With shared sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, and markets for voluntary organization in all walks of life – and prohibition on all actions against our people.

My simple point is that law is and forever will be the means of organizing a population into whatever polity possible, and the left will always be better able to use the semitic techniques of false promise, baiting into moral hazard, fictionalisms, to lie, cheat, and steal from our people, and subject them once again to defeat.

As far as I know this argument is unassailable other than to make the claim that the right and libertarians are better liars, whose message sells better than the false promises of the left, when what separates us largely from the left is that we speak the truth whether in scientific, legal, rationalist, or allegorical form, and that our message does not sell, but must be enforced, for the good of those who would hyper-consume the institutions that make our quality of life possible.

There is only one way of imposing order at any scale – and that is law: the market for punishment. What order you build upon that law, must today consist of force, finance, commons production, insurance, administration, and education. You cannot avoid producing all of those functions and survive competition in the world. It cannot be done.

And these are the roles of the various wings of the right and near right.

And if you understand my policy recommendations you will understand also that I’ve solved most of the means of preying upon our people

You must only decide:

(a) How you want to obtain power,

(b) What degree of separation to choose (conquest, secession, big sort.

(c) How you want to operate whatever government or governments result.

(d) What policies to enact if obtaining power and operating government, while still defending against enemies foreign and domestic.

(e) Whether you want to even attempt to impose dictatorship, or a state version of christianity. Because both will fail.

My preference is to defederalize, to redistribute centralized federal weath to many regions, eliminate discretionary rule in the federal government – leaving only watchman duties: military, treasury, insurer of last resort, judiciary limited to conflicts between the states.

My preference is to impose voluntary disassociation and let the ‘market’ do its job. (this will drive (((enemy))) and occupier into urban centers.(ghettos).

My preference is to issue warnings to all other states that if their people come here for our rule, then we will come there to rule their people out of self defense.

My preference is forcible repatriation and revocation of passports of the enemies in exchange for not engaging in war upon them mostly south america.

My preference is to make european religions of all forms the law of the land, and to prohibit all others, and to restore the churches to control of education, under threat of decomposition if they violate any of the laws.

My preference is to immediately export the revolution and restoration to the rest of our peoples – in cooperation with those outside of western europe -all of whom will help us.

But the truth is – we will ALWAYS AND EVERYWHERE gravitate to a government of rule of law if we want to survive competition on the world stage with our own people. Because we can outcompete others only by this means.

Everything else is not ‘my problem’ so to speak: it is yours. Because I don’t need to involve myself in anything other than bringing about change, and providing the means of transition, and a means of operating such a government if we win.

If you want to fight over control of it that’s your game. But you will, I promise, end up with what I propose simply because of the numbers, power, and knowledge of the different factions.

You can have wishes and fantasies. But the only reality that can exist is revolt is necessary and very soon. That it will be somewhere between uncomfortable and horrific. That we will choose PRAGMATICALLY whatever means of ‘divorce’ is most easily available (mine is easiest), and what rules to impose on people in order to complete the victory, while not being conquered by external forces.

Anything else you believe is nonsense. If you are too frightened to fight for these conditions then just shut up, cower, and stay out of the way of those who are not. There are men among us. And we are many. And we are enough.

Anyone i find deluding our people to any other set of options is an ally of our enemy, and I will, and we will, do everything possible to punish you and silence you for your actions.

Curt Doolittle.