Theme: Grammar

  • LET ME HELP YOU: YOU HAVE FAILED. A CHRISTIAN GSRRM EXAMPLE You didn’t make an a

    LET ME HELP YOU: YOU HAVE FAILED. A CHRISTIAN GSRRM EXAMPLE

    You didn’t make an argument. right? There is faith and there is reason, and faith exists to give a discount on reason. It’s not complicated.

    If your generation and your class are still dependent upon faith enough that my work isn’t valuable then that is not uncommon in history. and future generations will have the ability to choose.

    But data is in my favor. The religious are now the same percentage as the atheists. And as always we see movement to the extremes. Either atheist or evangelical with all other churches collapsing.

    Because in modernity we have the luxury of pursuing our cognitive preferences. Because there is no longer a need for ‘compromise communities’.

    Now,lets look at your abrahamic lies to show you how you are a liar, traied by liars, to lie, and why you fail:

    —“People make those arguments all the time, curt.”—

    Which tells us nothing about their truth or falsehood.

    —“Your narcissism prevents you from seeing them, much less reflecting upon your ideas.”—

    Either my ideas are true or false. They have nothing to do with my personality, or my psychology. gravity is gravity even if a madman proclaims it. Reciprocity is reciprocity even if psychopaths proclaims it. The source of a statement has no bearing on it’s truth.

    —“There is no sense in arguing with a man who has to be right at all costs. “—-

    You mean there is no sense arguing faith and psychic benefit against someone who seeks the truth, and will not compromise to make the faithful happy. In other words you are shaming like a woman assuming her affections are wanted. I want the ability for our people to engage in political divorces not your approval or demand for compliance with your trivial emotions.

    —“Enjoy your fb following of fellow spergnerds arguing about faith and falling in to irrelevancy because the vast majority of people are turned off by not only your ideas, but how you communicate them. “—

    Except that over time that’s not what happens, right? we keep growing. We keep growing because truth, the utility of truth, the policies possible under truth, will save our people, and are the only plan our people have. I dont expect you to like me or my ideas. I expect you to follow your self interest and survive – or not, and to die off. Because you have a record of increasing rates of failure in competition with judaism-islamism. YOu fear aristotle like church fathers yet it is aristotle that saved europe not only from islam but from christianity.

    —“You are doing nobody any favors.”–

    I am disciplining wayward children so that they can survive in a world hostile to naivety.

    —“I look forward to seeing the comments about how I was too low IQ to get it lol.”—

    I haven’t noticed that you’re too dim whatsoever. I’ve noticed that you are using the female argument of disapproval, shaming, ridicule, and rallying in order to defend your addiction and lack of agency.

    The right answer is. We must win. I will keep my faith. But we must win for me to keep it.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-18 10:02:00 UTC

  • RELIGION IS A GRAMMAR OF COGNITION —“…religion is one of the grammars of cog

    RELIGION IS A GRAMMAR OF COGNITION

    —“…religion is one of the grammars of cognition.” That’s perfect, Curt Doolittle.”—Thorsten Norgate

    All language consists of storytelling (changes in state). We program with stories. We calculate with stories. Every grammar requires only a means of telling a story, a means of disambiguation, a means of internal consistency, and a means of decidability.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-18 08:29:00 UTC

  • ETYMOLOGY: ‘RABBLE’ rabble (n) c. 1300, “pack of animals,” possibly related to M

    ETYMOLOGY: ‘RABBLE’

    rabble (n)

    c. 1300, “pack of animals,” possibly related to Middle English rablen “to gabble, speak in a rapid, confused manner,” probably imitative of hurry, noise, and confusion (compare Middle Dutch rabbelen, Low German rabbeln “to chatter”). Meaning “tumultuous crowd of vulgar, noisy people” is from late 14c.; applied contemptuously to the common or low part of any populace from 1550s.

    (someone used the term and I realized I didn’t know its origin)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-17 11:28:00 UTC

  • PATTERNS OF SPEECH Notice how someone (sophisticated with world experience yet e

    PATTERNS OF SPEECH

    Notice how someone (sophisticated with world experience yet entirely empirical) like Michael comments and how other people (unsophisticated, without worldly experience, and entirely sentimental or anecdotal) comment. I ought to do a study of categories of comments just to show people how wise, smart, ignorant, and stupid people comment on a ignorant-wise, stupid-smart grid just to illustrate by pattern recognition what different people think like and act like.

    wise people ask.

    smart people tell

    ignorant people reject

    stupid people *retaliate*


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-17 11:26:00 UTC

  • Again. The voice of conflation, ignorance, and arrogance. You cannot seemly dist

    Again. The voice of conflation, ignorance, and arrogance. You cannot seemly distinguish between religion(resistance) ideology(utility) philosophy (preference) law (rules) and science (truth).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-16 18:11:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096834427236335617

    Reply addressees: @DataDistribute @VengefulPrag @ReiMurasame

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096819993587535873


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096819993587535873

  • ONLY POSTS MENTIONING MOLDBUG (mostly to illustrate cultural differences in argu

    ONLY POSTS MENTIONING MOLDBUG

    (mostly to illustrate cultural differences in argument)

    ======

    THE PERSISTENCE OF ENLIGHTENMENT CULTURAL BIAS IN PHILOSOPHY

    (anarchism, neo-reaction, testimonialism)

    Curtis Yarvin kinda did the Jewish thing: rhetorically loaded criticism (gossip).

    Hans Hoppe kinda did the German thing: rational justification of moral priors.

    Doolittle (that’s me), I kinda did the Anglo thing: science and law.

    –“Your life is the sum of a remainder of an unbalanced equation..”—

    So true. We are just reminders in the algorithm that we call our cultural traditions. Free will? Maybe.

    But I feel like I’m a tiny rider on the elephant of Indo-European, Anglo Saxon, and Norman traditions.

    Curt Doolittle

    =====

    —“I didn’t realize you were a fellow reader of Moldbug”—Anthony Ray Collins

    I read everything worth reading.

    1) Moldbug: Jewish Critique (pilpul)

    2) Hoppe: German Rationalism (philosophy)

    3) Doolittle: Anglo Empiricism (science and law)

    The world isn’t complicated. 😉

    We all say the same thing in the languages of our civilizations. What’s different is that

    1) Molbug is inactionable.

    2) Hoppe’s solutions are actionable but unsurvivable.

    3) And my solutions are both actionable and survivable.

    Again. The world isn’t complicated. 😉

    We cannot escape our cultural baggage.

    =====

    What Neo-Reaction Consists In? Three Points: The Cathedral Criticism, NeoCameralism, and “Formalism”

    https://propertarianism.com/2015/11/07/what-neo-reaction-consists-in-three-points-the-cathedral-criticism-neocameralism-and-formalism/

    ====

    Kudos, and A Question: “Do You Identify With the Label Alt-Right, or New Right?”

    https://propertarianism.com/2015/12/24/29989/

    ====

    The State of NRx and its Relation to Propertarianism

    https://propertarianism.com/2015/08/24/the-state-of-nrx-and-its-relation-to-propertarianism/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-16 08:18:00 UTC

  • SINGLE TIME” THE CRITICS OF P AND STRAWMEN. by Dustin Hutchinson Every. Single.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jDOMmk3N_A&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR2_24LYUZh7H5lhyRc2XTuOPdUB8aovITA5GZV2QxYT9XI2zlVP6lZBqcc”EVERY SINGLE TIME” THE CRITICS OF P AND STRAWMEN.

    by Dustin Hutchinson

    Every. Single. Fucking. Time.

    Critic builds straw man.

    Critic destroys straw man.

    Critic performs victory dance.

    Critic completely missed the point.

    (CURTD: People defend priors no matter how absurd to the death because property in toto tells us that they will defend all investments, and in particular, those investments from which they obtain self worth (identity). We must give them time. They will get there a little at a time.)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jDOMmk3N_A


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-16 08:04:00 UTC

  • That is the correct definition, because it is the only definition not conflated

    That is the correct definition, because it is the only definition not conflated with other definitions.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-15 15:34:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096432695486398465

    Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @Avicebrony @DataDistribute

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096405210988244992


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096405210988244992

  • DO WE POSITIVELY DISAMBIGUATE OR AMBIGUATE IN DEFENSE? —“I think it’s insultin

    DO WE POSITIVELY DISAMBIGUATE OR AMBIGUATE IN DEFENSE?

    —“I think it’s insulting for idealists to be associated with Evola. It’s not primacy of consciousness, it’s not Kant. It’s sword-and-sorcery. People who say that Evola introduced them to philosophy weren’t introduced to it at all; they were just stalled and set up for humiliation if they ever decided to argue with a philosophical opponent. They should read Heidegger instead if they insist on living outside of reality, but even he might prove too profane and earthly for their liking.”—by Göran Dahl

    CURTD: Correct. But this is the problem tho: unless taught the direct road, people must take what road that is easiest to follow given their experience.

    And they always and everywhere move from the emotive to the analytic – slowly for reasons anyone familiar with artificial intelligence and neurology can explain: more neural christmas tree lights go on with emotion until you have enough information to light them without it.

    And there is the rub: do we disambiguate, and suppress conflation between literature (analogy) and thought (philosophy, history) and teach stoicism and the law (which is intuitive). Or do we make a via-positiva claim about philosophy, religion, occult, and maintain conflation and ‘ambiguation’.

    This is the problem with differences between anglo-scandinavian, franco-german continental, and italian peoples We get better intellectuals out of italy in the south, and england in the north, and better engineers, craftsmen, and citizens in germany. But why? Genetically we are all germanic (european) peoples.

    So the general argument is that we must ‘program’ good behavior into people (germany good, france bad) by educating their intuition with emotion, teaching them mindfulness, and teaching them the law. purely out of defense against those who lie.

    Education is just as defensive as it is opportunity generating.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-15 07:24:00 UTC

  • “The economics of language.”—Greg Hamilton

    —“The economics of language.”—Greg Hamilton


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-14 18:13:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096110265739882497