—“It never gets easier, you just get better” is how I’d approach your work. Like learning a programming language. Generally it’s as much about learning the syntax/grammar as the principles.”—Todd E. Magnusson
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 08:24:00 UTC
Not until it’s a little farther along. Missing social science, missing the grammars, but the ‘moral argument’ so to speak is in there
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 03:38:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191922870609498112
Reply addressees: @libertypaleo @anon12376301335
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191919669902340096
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191919669902340096
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/74662391_500450310551864_2008810256502620160_o_500450307218531.jpg TYING THE UNIVERSE TOGETHER IN ONE CHART
(example of using the grammars)
I made this to illustrate that austrian economics is simply the lowest level of economic study, using operationalism (a sequence of rational incentives) in order to circumvent the problem of a full accounting. For this reason I equate austrian economics with rule of law as the foundations of social science. So, full accounting economics under rule of law,. The purpose of which is to improve our information and understanding without interfering.
Chicago Economics sought to remain within the rule of law and provide solutions to insure us from exceptions.
Most macro economics is concerned largely with monetary, banking, and financial system and it has very little to do with anything other than how broken this archaic treasury, financial, banking and credit system is.
Most political economics (mainstream) is an exercise in the use of maximum disinformation for the purpose of maximizing commercial, financial, and political extraction from the productive classes using the false promise of employment as a measure.TYING THE UNIVERSE TOGETHER IN ONE CHART
(example of using the grammars)
I made this to illustrate that austrian economics is simply the lowest level of economic study, using operationalism (a sequence of rational incentives) in order to circumvent the problem of a full accounting. For this reason I equate austrian economics with rule of law as the foundations of social science. So, full accounting economics under rule of law,. The purpose of which is to improve our information and understanding without interfering.
Chicago Economics sought to remain within the rule of law and provide solutions to insure us from exceptions.
Most macro economics is concerned largely with monetary, banking, and financial system and it has very little to do with anything other than how broken this archaic treasury, financial, banking and credit system is.
Most political economics (mainstream) is an exercise in the use of maximum disinformation for the purpose of maximizing commercial, financial, and political extraction from the productive classes using the false promise of employment as a measure.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 16:48:00 UTC
All Grammars (Logics) Perform The Same Function https://propertarianism.com/2019/11/02/all-grammars-logics-perform-the-same-function/
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 01:43:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190444382995894272
[A]ll grammars perform the same function, providing a scope(dimensions) of permissible vocabulary, a set of comparison operators; and a grammar and syntax of continuous recursive disambiguation, all of which rely upon identity, similarity, and differences in constant relations, the simplest we know of which is arithmetic (positional names), and the next simplest of which are the first order logics, but all such grammars are simply variations on the human language facility: the use of a grammar, operators (vocabulary), and references(vocabulary) to produce transactions we call meaning.
[A]ll grammars perform the same function, providing a scope(dimensions) of permissible vocabulary, a set of comparison operators; and a grammar and syntax of continuous recursive disambiguation, all of which rely upon identity, similarity, and differences in constant relations, the simplest we know of which is arithmetic (positional names), and the next simplest of which are the first order logics, but all such grammars are simply variations on the human language facility: the use of a grammar, operators (vocabulary), and references(vocabulary) to produce transactions we call meaning.
The principle means by which jews,christians,muslims, in the old world, and marxists, postmodernists, and feminists in the modern world, is to use words people don’t comprehend in operational terms, to conduct false promises by sophisms that do little but bait fools into hazard.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 19:43:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190353628860694530
Reply addressees: @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190352047998029824
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang Authoritarianism = Borrowing by individuals, Investment by individuals, in industries producible by individuals, producing returns for individuals, that is appropriated (stolen) by the state, and redistributed to non-borrowers, investors, producers.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190352047998029824
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang Authoritarianism = Borrowing by individuals, Investment by individuals, in industries producible by individuals, producing returns for individuals, that is appropriated (stolen) by the state, and redistributed to non-borrowers, investors, producers.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190352047998029824
–“Logic is a type of math.”–
Not quite true. all grammars perform the same function, providing a scope(dimensions) of permissible vocabulary, a set of comparison operators; and a grammar and syntax of continuous recursive disambiguation, all of which rely upon identity, similarity, and differences in constant relations, the simplest we know of which is arithmetic (positional names), and the next simplest of which are the first order logics, but all such grammars are simply variations on the human language facility: the use of a grammar, operators (vocabulary), and references(vocabulary) to produce transactions we call meaning.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 14:41:00 UTC
THE AUDIENCE IS ‘EVERYONE ABLE, AND NO ONE UNABLE’.
—“Seriously, why don’t you write in sentences, the layperson can understand? Nobody, absolutely nobody wants to carry dictionary or Thesaurus around with them. Again, seriously, who is your audience?”—
Seriously, why don’t you recognize that I write the same set of concepts in in essay, argument, aphorism, ‘poetic list’, table, graph, and serialized form because each of these forms increases the informational density of the content, providing different minds, different means?
For some of you, an explanation is required.
For others, a set of bullet points is required.
For others an aphorism is required.
For others a diagram is required.
Because some of us rapidly understand complex relations quickly and some of us need them explained in prose.
I can read the equations that capture the entire description of the physical universe. Other people need prose, and others videos, and others cartoons.
The audience is ‘everyone able, and no one unable’.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 08:22:00 UTC
WHICH OF YOUR COGNITIVE MARKETS ARE YOU SERVING?
The verb to be circumvents existence, which is what you are trying to cirumvent testifying for, just as Heiddeger was trying to cirvument and… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496040327659529&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 16:20:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189577764464136192