It is not always obvious what some whacko will interpret from prose.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-30 15:32:00 UTC
Theme: Grammar
-
It’s not like I set out to do it. I set out to create a value neutral language o
It’s not like I set out to do it. I set out to create a value neutral language of ethics and politics. Once I understood the conflict between hayek and mises I literally stumbled on the consequences. It’s just true. It is what it is.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 19:03:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200490563520356352
Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200489171749609473
IN REPLY TO:
@KillerkattArt
@curtdoolittle @ArturBooth @DegenRolf Good luck with that.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200489171749609473
-
Nature consists of constant relations.We can describe those constant relations.M
Nature consists of constant relations.We can describe those constant relations.Math is the language of positional relations, logic of set relations, and operations of humanly possible subjectively testable actions. Law consists in the test of the MOST constant relations possible.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 18:46:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200486223434932230
Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200485544381300736
IN REPLY TO:
@KillerkattArt
@curtdoolittle @ArturBooth @DegenRolf Way to miss the point: laws are generated by humans, not nature, and especially the closer they deal with more than one abstract means of expression. If your forte is law, then your own theory ought to render your profession as redundant and useless.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200485544381300736
-
Actually, it’s not ‘meaning’ it’s ‘sentiment’. Not only can we use words communi
Actually, it’s not ‘meaning’ it’s ‘sentiment’. Not only can we use words communicate meaning (reason), but we can load (sentiments), and usually by means of suggestion (deception). The ‘big lies’ are all constructed by this method, and postmodernism institutionalized it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 14:39:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200424170422755330
Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200380102242160641
IN REPLY TO:
@KillerkattArt
@DegenRolf Oh, shocking, words can generate meaning! And meaning increases value: Wow! Who ever would have guessed?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200380102242160641
-
Observer, Start, Positional Name: If you name zero (0) “start” and each ‘number’
Observer, Start, Positional Name: If you name zero (0) “start” and each ‘number’ a positional name then the ‘mystery’ of math rapidly disappears, with the only question being why didn’t we use the right of the decimal rather than the left. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-28 13:52:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200049801854885889
-
Observer, Start, Positional Name: If you name zero (0) “start” and each ‘number’
Observer, Start, Positional Name: If you name zero (0) “start” and each ‘number’ a positional name then the ‘mystery’ of math rapidly disappears, with the only question being why didn’t we use the right of the decimal rather than the left. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-28 08:52:00 UTC
-
1: paradoxes (sets) vs only bad grammar (operations) 2: all = inclusive (sets) v
1: paradoxes (sets) vs only bad grammar (operations)
2: all = inclusive (sets) vs all = dependent (operations)
3: sets (ideals) vs operations (reals)
Your quip was version of #2.
Almost all philosophy is nonsense.
Just bad grammar.
Numerology with vocabulary.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 01:56:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198782360856223744
Reply addressees: @Joseph_EHerrera
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198777986083889152
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198777986083889152
-
This doesn’t take much computational power, only expanding statements into promi
This doesn’t take much computational power, only expanding statements into promissory, complete sentences, in operational vocabulary.
The vast majority – with rare exceptions – of what people say is false and/or irreciprocal if it is outside of their direct experience.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 01:24:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198774370178666496
Reply addressees: @balajis
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198773862898552832
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@balajis TEST:identity(disambiguation), internal consistency(logic), external correspondence(empirical), operational language (existential possibility), rational choice (bounded rationality), reciprocity (in choice), completeness (limits, full accounting), parsimony (competitive).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1198773862898552832
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@balajis TEST:identity(disambiguation), internal consistency(logic), external correspondence(empirical), operational language (existential possibility), rational choice (bounded rationality), reciprocity (in choice), completeness (limits, full accounting), parsimony (competitive).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1198773862898552832
-
This subject is over your head I think. 😉 Closure is UNNECESSARY IN FALSIFICATI
This subject is over your head I think. 😉 Closure is UNNECESSARY IN FALSIFICATION. The grammar of positional names (math) is trivial compared to the grammar of human operations (thought, display, word, and deed). You don’t ascertain truth, you ascertain falsehood.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 01:17:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198772560852336640
Reply addressees: @balajis
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198729374004060165
IN REPLY TO:
@balajis
Coding “Truegle” for real is a fun concept
For math you are limited by Gödel Incompleteness and the Halting Problem
For encyclopedia facts you can use knowledge graph approaches
But in other areas you might have to show all sides. Explicit epistemology. https://t.co/IXTWFlATICOriginal post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198729374004060165
-
If you can’t define the series of constant relations to which the word you’re us
If you can’t define the series of constant relations to which the word you’re using belongs, you do not understand the word.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-24 19:16:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198681824844812288