Curt Doolittle

Theme: Grammar

  • High Court Justices must find commensurability across generations of text. As lo

    High Court Justices must find commensurability across generations of text. As long as constitution, legislation, regulation and findings of the court (case law) are constructed from reciprocity and defenses of it, then it’s possible to make rational, logical, empirical decisions.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-11 15:27:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1348652875346554880

  • SCALIA Working through his book reading the law, and he’s so close to P, but he

    SCALIA
    Working through his book reading the law, and he’s so close to P, but he lacks the technical understanding (common in his generation) of both language, logic, science, and european group strategy to propose P-Law complete reforms, for turning jurisprudence into science.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-08 20:05:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1347635596924231680

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: Lies of Context Lies of Obfuscation Lies of Omission Lies of

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: Lies of Context
    Lies of Obfuscation
    Lies of Omission
    Lies of Ambiguity

    One of the strongest benefits we will gain in ad…

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-04 18:26:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1346161196035137543

  • @Carabistouille The reason I teach The grammars, natural law, and testimony and

    @Carabistouille The reason I teach The grammars, natural law, and testimony and campaign against abrahamic deceits of the abrahamic religions, philosophies (postmodernism, woke, anti-male, anti-white), and pseudosciences (marxism, neo-marxism, socialism), is specifically to stop you from this kind of lie.

    Prediction vs Trust vs Intuition vs Faith

    Predict given data, trust given evidence, intuition given objective experience, faith in the supernatural despite data, evidence, and objective experience.

    You trust a plumber. You have faith in God.
    You can predict, trust, and intuit evidence.
    You MUST have faith in god because you have nothing else.

    It’s this kind of lying that was invented in the middle east, added by Paul to the teachings of jesus, and with which paul and followers created the religion of christianity REGARDELESS of what jesus actually said and did (which is very little and is captured in the jefferson bible).

    NO MORE LIES.
    Jesus is enough. If he isn’t. Then you don’t understand him at all.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-02 19:01:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105487670581260629

  • Boost of @curtd @Carabistouille The reason I teach The grammars, natural law, an

    Boost of @curtd@Carabistouille The reason I teach The grammars, natural law, and testimony and campaign against abrahamic deceits of the abrahamic religions, philosophies (postmodernism, woke, anti-male, anti-white), and pseudosciences (marxism, neo-marxism, socialism), is specifically to stop you from this kind of lie.

    Prediction vs Trust vs Intuition vs Faith

    Predict given data, trust given evidence, intuition given objective experience, faith in the supernatural despite data, evidence, and objective experience.

    You trust a plumber. You have faith in God.
    You can predict, trust, and intuit evidence.
    You MUST have faith in god because you have nothing else.

    It’s this kind of lying that was invented in the middle east, added by Paul to the teachings of jesus, and with which paul and followers created the religion of christianity REGARDELESS of what jesus actually said and did (which is very little and is captured in the jefferson bible).

    NO MORE LIES.
    Jesus is enough. If he isn’t. Then you don’t understand him at all.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-02 19:01:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105487675029300918

  • Sense (having enough) has never been common. Common Sense (not having much) is c

    Sense (having enough) has never been common. Common Sense (not having much) is common. 😉

    Disambiguation. lol

    Source date (UTC): 2020-12-30 03:25:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1344122503191535616

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11 @ThruTheHayes @ScottAdamsSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1344122220424134662

  • It takes a little effort to train yourself to disambiguate terms into a series,

    It takes a little effort to train yourself to disambiguate terms into a series, more to think in series of states instead of ideal types, and more to speak in complete sentences(transactions).Ordinary speech is lazy and convenient – rules of thumb – where all error-deceit begins.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-12-29 17:06:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1343966593672425475

  • MATHEMATICS AND LOGIC THEN: All non-operational grammars produce holes. All oper

    MATHEMATICS AND LOGIC THEN:
    All non-operational grammars produce holes.
    All operational grammars are limited to possible operations.
    But can express all possibilities in the grammar.
    There is no end to complexity so no grammar, even one that can evolve, is universally complete.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-12-28 18:08:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1343619768532807681

  • What if We ‘Re-Ran’ the Universe?

      Would Life Evolve?

    1. Any “grammar” given enough opportunity(scale and time) will calculate(randomly discover) every opportunity (possibility) to defeat entropy(capture energy). The sun, distance, temperature, water-vapor, iron-core, moon, duration combination is looking rarer than I’d expected.
    2. It is extremely unlikely that the universe can produce variations other than the one that we see around us.
    3. The theory of many universes (bubbles) is unequal to alternate universes.
    4. We apparently cannot deduce from the information available the geometry of the subatomic.
    5. It’s more likely that some variation on the constructivist method (Wolfram) will produce information that suggests the underlying geometry, and that we can solve for the differences.
    6. Why? Mathiness is a problem in physics, and most “silly ideas” reflect limits of math.
    7. none of these propositions claim knowledge of physics, they claim only that the many questionable hypotheses we see put forward in physics reflect human ignorance of the constitution of mathematics (description, sets, deduction) and computation (construction by operations).

  • What if We ‘Re-Ran’ the Universe?

      Would Life Evolve?

    1. Any “grammar” given enough opportunity(scale and time) will calculate(randomly discover) every opportunity (possibility) to defeat entropy(capture energy). The sun, distance, temperature, water-vapor, iron-core, moon, duration combination is looking rarer than I’d expected.
    2. It is extremely unlikely that the universe can produce variations other than the one that we see around us.
    3. The theory of many universes (bubbles) is unequal to alternate universes.
    4. We apparently cannot deduce from the information available the geometry of the subatomic.
    5. It’s more likely that some variation on the constructivist method (Wolfram) will produce information that suggests the underlying geometry, and that we can solve for the differences.
    6. Why? Mathiness is a problem in physics, and most “silly ideas” reflect limits of math.
    7. none of these propositions claim knowledge of physics, they claim only that the many questionable hypotheses we see put forward in physics reflect human ignorance of the constitution of mathematics (description, sets, deduction) and computation (construction by operations).