Theme: Grammar

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @AriDavidMelnick @TruthQuest11 @WorMartiN @noah_nonsense @NWi

    RT @curtdoolittle: @AriDavidMelnick @TruthQuest11 @WorMartiN @noah_nonsense @NWildfang West indo european languages are ‘white’, meaning ba…


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-23 20:51:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353083036372504576

  • Sense > Perception > Auto-Association > Prediction > Recusion > State (Pointer)

    Sense > Perception > Auto-Association > Prediction > Recusion > State (Pointer) > Grammar ->

    …………………………………….o—-> Physical Law
    Speech -> Formal Law -> o—-> Natural Law (Behavior)
    …………………………………….o—-> Evolutionary Law


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-20 00:34:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351689506991312896

  • Because it died. IMO it was done with either turing->chomsky or delayed until Kr

    Because it died. IMO it was done with either turing->chomsky or delayed until Kripke.

    truth < unambiguity < law < science < logic < analytic <-> continental > critical theory > marxism > literary > ambiguity > falsehood


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-18 20:15:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351261892644401152

    Reply addressees: @mr_scientism

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351248899441389568

  • The Simplicity of the Langauge of Mathematics

    1 – All stimulation begins with sequences of pulses. That’s all nerves and neurons do – measurements of relations. – predicting fragments (of potential referents) 2 – All sequences of pulses produce relations – measurements of relations. = predicting components of objects (potential referents) 3 – All sequences of relations produce spaces, objects, and boundaries – measurements of relations. – predicting the objects (referents) 4 – All bodily actions on spaces, objects, or boundaries require measurements – of relations (possible actions) 5 – All language consists of sets of measurements of constant, contingent, and non-relations between measurements. (it must) 6 – The language of Mathematics consists of the language of commensurability between measurements of constant relations. 7 – The mathematical disciplines consist of systems of measurement for increasingly complex relations (Dimensions) 8 – Statistics is the beginning of the recursive loop the cycle of commensurability of references. 9 – This is why n-body particles (waves) in physics are calculated probabilistically (by quanta). 10 – The limit of mathematics is smaller than the limit of computability (permutation) (some descriptions are constructible, but not predictable, nor deducible.) 11 – Mathematics is the scale-independent, referent independent, language of commensurability between inter-dependent referents in constant relation. 12 – Unfortunately the intuitionistic program failed to reform mathematics into a science (operationalized). 13 – Unfortunately Babbage’s revolution failed, and Cantor, Bohr, and less so Einstien re=platonized mathematics, and math was built on sets (platonic) not operations (scientific). The structure of all language, and of the sub-language of mathematics can be put on a poster just like the periodic table. The archaic terminology replaced with operational terminology and children would find it much easier to learn. Math ‘works’ for constant relations (the physical world) less so for the economic world, and less so for the sentient world, because it’s dead simple. It has one property. “Order in the Sequence”, and every name in the sequence has a unique positional name, so the language of mathematics is closed to conflation, making it an ideal language for measurement. And because it is reference independent, it provides commensurability between referents, and because it is scale-independent it provides scale-independent, arbitrary precision. Math is a very simple thing. A stupid simple thing. it’s not the language of math itself that’s complicated. It’s that deducing increasingly complex measurements with that language is increasingly difficult unless you can learn to imagine mathematical structures in your mind by repetition.

  • The Simplicity of the Langauge of Mathematics

    1 – All stimulation begins with sequences of pulses. That’s all nerves and neurons do – measurements of relations. – predicting fragments (of potential referents) 2 – All sequences of pulses produce relations – measurements of relations. = predicting components of objects (potential referents) 3 – All sequences of relations produce spaces, objects, and boundaries – measurements of relations. – predicting the objects (referents) 4 – All bodily actions on spaces, objects, or boundaries require measurements – of relations (possible actions) 5 – All language consists of sets of measurements of constant, contingent, and non-relations between measurements. (it must) 6 – The language of Mathematics consists of the language of commensurability between measurements of constant relations. 7 – The mathematical disciplines consist of systems of measurement for increasingly complex relations (Dimensions) 8 – Statistics is the beginning of the recursive loop the cycle of commensurability of references. 9 – This is why n-body particles (waves) in physics are calculated probabilistically (by quanta). 10 – The limit of mathematics is smaller than the limit of computability (permutation) (some descriptions are constructible, but not predictable, nor deducible.) 11 – Mathematics is the scale-independent, referent independent, language of commensurability between inter-dependent referents in constant relation. 12 – Unfortunately the intuitionistic program failed to reform mathematics into a science (operationalized). 13 – Unfortunately Babbage’s revolution failed, and Cantor, Bohr, and less so Einstien re=platonized mathematics, and math was built on sets (platonic) not operations (scientific). The structure of all language, and of the sub-language of mathematics can be put on a poster just like the periodic table. The archaic terminology replaced with operational terminology and children would find it much easier to learn. Math ‘works’ for constant relations (the physical world) less so for the economic world, and less so for the sentient world, because it’s dead simple. It has one property. “Order in the Sequence”, and every name in the sequence has a unique positional name, so the language of mathematics is closed to conflation, making it an ideal language for measurement. And because it is reference independent, it provides commensurability between referents, and because it is scale-independent it provides scale-independent, arbitrary precision. Math is a very simple thing. A stupid simple thing. it’s not the language of math itself that’s complicated. It’s that deducing increasingly complex measurements with that language is increasingly difficult unless you can learn to imagine mathematical structures in your mind by repetition.

  • The grammars illustrate that all speech (thought) follows the same pattern of tr

    The grammars illustrate that all speech (thought) follows the same pattern of transaction making.
    The operational language unifies them.
    Together disambiguating langauge


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-17 12:11:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1350777883405508609

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1350776027417604098

  • My understanding of language is that it consists of measurements – an has to. Th

    My understanding of language is that it consists of measurements – an has to. The question is what is one measuring in what paradigm? And what metaphysical constraints are on this paradigm?


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-16 23:14:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1350582140384256000

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @LukeWeinhagen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1350581759025491970


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Imperius__13 @LukeWeinhagen Because you seem to ahve a difficulty explaing our shared purpose by unshared means. I’m writing law (what cannot be done). Because law is how scale governments HAVE TO be operated.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1350581759025491970

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: @curtdoolittle LAW IS THE KING OF THE HILL (Deflationary Gramm

    RT @ThruTheHayes: @curtdoolittle LAW IS THE KING OF THE HILL

    (Deflationary Grammar)
    Logic
    … Math
    … … Algorithms
    … … … Recipes, Protocols
    ……


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-14 05:01:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349582383645929472

  • Secondly, so the difference is between internal consistency within and coherence

    Secondly, so the difference is between internal consistency within and coherence across. Technically we can argue under p that they are the same. But coherence provides for adversarialism between dimensions.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-12 19:04:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349069640522199040

    Reply addressees: @WorMartiN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349061180648779777


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @WorMartiN Logic = constant relations = test of internal consistency = falsification. I think us see where we’ve been disconnecting now. Foundations of the grammars. Need a white board to go over it with you.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1349061180648779777

  • Logic = constant relations = test of internal consistency = falsification. I thi

    Logic = constant relations = test of internal consistency = falsification. I think us see where we’ve been disconnecting now. Foundations of the grammars. Need a white board to go over it with you.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-12 18:30:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349061180648779777

    Reply addressees: @WorMartiN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349036445311393793