Theme: Governance

  • The Chinese strategic method is to delay and deceive while avoiding direct confl

    The Chinese strategic method is to delay and deceive while avoiding direct conflict until they have obtained an entrenched position and win by default because the cost is too high to reverse.

    Now, the western model was – traditionally – to solve problems quickly before the other side could concentrate great forces.

    And so the problem with the Chinese strategy is that while it has worked throughout most of their history, it didn’t work against the Japanese, and moreover, it will not work against the west unless the west defacto wants it to.

    I love the fact that china is building up the south china sea while the international courts say that they have no claim to it.

    Just gives the usa an excuse.

    sigh.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-12 12:32:00 UTC

  • EVOLUTION OF A CONDITION OF LIBERTY: THE STRUGGLE FROM DISCRETIONARY TO NON DISC

    EVOLUTION OF A CONDITION OF LIBERTY: THE STRUGGLE FROM DISCRETIONARY TO NON DISCRETIONARY TO MARKET RULE.

    (important piece) (consolidates concepts)

    Western Man struggles against discretionary (arbitrary) rule, in an effort to construct a condition of non-discretionary rule: Rule of Law.

    Rule of Law is imposed upon men by the organized use of violence to prohibit discretionary rule.

    Natural Law (property) provides Perfect Decidability to Rule of law, eliminating the need for discretionary rule.

    Natural Law prohibits the imposition of costs upon others, by the universal requirement for productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer of that which man has homesteaded or obtained such transfers, when the acts were limited to externalities of the same criteria: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer.

    Common Law evolves incrementally by the identification of new methods of unproductive, insufficiently informed, unwarrantied, involuntary transfers, causing externalities of the same criteria, and adding those prohibitions to the canon of the law.

    Law of the Commons (Government) evolves:

    – First by concentrating rent seeking in the central authority, and suppressing familial, tribal, and local rent seeking, enabling each individual to act with his property in his best interests.

    – Second, the law of the commons evolves by the organization of production of commons, while removing the inability to defect from (free ride upon) the costs of provisioning those commons.

    – Third the law of the commons evolves to provide insurer of last resort as a service to the commons.

    – Fourth, the centralized rent seeking is eliminated by the conversion of the functions of insurer, and commons-producer, into a market for the selection of commons and tolerance for insurance. (Contractualism).

    Constitutions enumerate the processes by which rule of law, using market government, under natural law, is conducted by ordinary men.

    By use of force to create and fund, then market to persist, the meritocratic order is constructed against the will of the free riders that constitute all but a minority of the population.

    Man was not oppressed – he has been domesticated as surely as our plants and animals. Domesticated by the incremental suppression of parasitism through natural law, reproductive control, and aggressively culling the parasitic.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertaraian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-11 06:16:00 UTC

  • My political agenda is to devolve the empire, to constrain any federal governmen

    My political agenda is to devolve the empire, to constrain any federal government to defense, insurer or last resort, and interstate property conflict, and to liberate as many states to experiment in as many ways possible, creating lots of opportunity for ‘people at the top’.

    Let a thousand nations bloom.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-10 22:36:00 UTC

  • BLACK PANTHERS BECOME LIBERTARIANS? —“Asked by this reporter what his group’s

    BLACK PANTHERS BECOME LIBERTARIANS?

    —“Asked by this reporter what his group’s endgame is, Omowale replied:

    The end game is land ownership. The endgame is our own government in a nation within a nation. Okay. So we claim the states of Louisiana, we claim the states of Mississippi, we claim the states of South Carolina, we claim the states of Alabama, and we claim the states of Georgia.

    We just need to start migrating back to those states and taking control of the economics in those states. If black people move in, most definitely white people will move out. So it’s not a hard process for us to have our own country within a country.”—-

    smart guy


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-10 22:30:00 UTC

  • “CREATE A COUNTRY WITHIN A COUNTRY” Great idea. Different peoples need different

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/07/10/exclusive-new-black-panther-leader-country-within/PANTHERS: “CREATE A COUNTRY WITHIN A COUNTRY”

    Great idea. Different peoples need different states so that they can construct the commons that suit their interests.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-10 22:28:00 UTC

  • If black Americans take this much further we are only going to have to hit light

    If black Americans take this much further we are only going to have to hit light infrastructure and publish demands.

    If you take out the police the next level is military, and then we have won.

    I’ve been stating for years now that it is not as important to plan a revolution as it is to constantly exploit opportunities.

    If the black lives movement wants to save us time, effort, and lives, then that’s all the better.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-10 12:55:00 UTC

  • We get Hillary, and we get our excuse for revolution. We get trump and we buy ti

    We get Hillary, and we get our excuse for revolution. We get trump and we buy time.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-10 03:52:00 UTC

  • Presidents Matter. Wilson(German Surrender), FDR(pre-30’s immigrants), Kennedy-J

    Presidents Matter.

    Wilson(German Surrender), FDR(pre-30’s immigrants), Kennedy-Johnson(underclass boomers), Carter(islamic fundamentalism), Clinton (destruction of military tradition), Obama (islamic expansionism, anti-white racism, empire-withrawl)

    We must not allow discretion in such matters of intertemporal import.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-09 07:02:00 UTC

  • DID THE MARXIST/SOCIALIST-LIBERTARIAN-NEOCONS GIVE US THE INCENTIVE TO FINALLY O

    DID THE MARXIST/SOCIALIST-LIBERTARIAN-NEOCONS GIVE US THE INCENTIVE TO FINALLY OVERCOME OUR HUMILITY?

    From one perspective, the Marxist-Socialists and the Ashkenazi Pseudoscientific Enlightenment combined with protestant feminists (less attractive women), catholics (the lower classes), blacks (the underclasses) created a successful series of revolts against the productive classes (military, legal, financial, entrepreneurial, agrarian), by co-opting media(selling consumer goods to all of their constituents), education (indoctrinating generations into the false narrative), and academy(selling false narratives to new constituents in exchange for economic rewards) in a successful attempt to overthrow our aryan(eugenic) experiment in formalizing contractualism (constitutional natural law) into a new civilization.

    From another, without this crisis would we have every discovered, written down, our reasons for excellence in the ancient and modern worlds?

    Have they not given us the excuse to finally formulate, articulate, document, and institutionalize our ancient traditions as a new world order – not just for ourselves, but for all mankind?

    If the liars can create three books of lies, then why cannot the truth-speakers create a book of truths?

    If lies can be spread by the sword, why cannot truths be spread by the contemporary weaponry?

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-09 06:14:00 UTC

  • The timing is crass, and a apologise in advance: but when I say that stability i

    The timing is crass, and a apologise in advance: but when I say that stability is an illusion, and that our order is fragile, and that revolution is easier now than at any time in history, this is an example of why.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-08 01:55:00 UTC