You don’t think we are done paying the high cost of domesticating man, do you?
The evidence is out there.
To domesticate we must rule.
To rule we must bear the costs of rule
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-17 10:25:00 UTC
You don’t think we are done paying the high cost of domesticating man, do you?
The evidence is out there.
To domesticate we must rule.
To rule we must bear the costs of rule
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-17 10:25:00 UTC
So while you mean well, it is either and error or facetious to cast Fascism as a model rather than a weapon of warfare.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-17 08:31:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754594323673583616
Reply addressees: @jeffreyatucker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754449621531766784
IN REPLY TO:
@jeffreytucker
Today many people have asked me for a definition of fascism. Ok. Fascism is socialism shorn of its least popular… https://t.co/kpeyhW2yQS
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754449621531766784
Just as Napoleonic Total War mobilized all citizens for martial warfare, Fascism mobilizes the economy for economic war.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-17 08:29:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754593823783841792
Reply addressees: @jeffreyatucker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754449621531766784
IN REPLY TO:
@jeffreytucker
Today many people have asked me for a definition of fascism. Ok. Fascism is socialism shorn of its least popular… https://t.co/kpeyhW2yQS
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754449621531766784
MORE ON THE GREAT SHIFT
Haidt provided causal relation btw enlightenment Natural Law and contemporary natural law
Political compromise btw gender/class moved from in-family to houses of govt.
The problem then is monopoly majoritarianism instead of houses for classes: trades.
But families in post-agrarian economies are unequal insurers of last resort
Ironically perhaps: individualism destroyed the possibility of expanding democracy.
Albeit this is too causally dense an explanation for communication via twitter.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-17 04:55:00 UTC
WHAT DOES FASCISM MEAN?
TO: @jeffreyatucker on FASCISM
Fascism is a technology by which a tribe, and nation, can marshall all economic resources to defeat universalist communism.
Just as Napoleonic Total War mobilized all citizens for martial warfare, Fascism mobilizes the economy for economic war.
Marxist Socialism attempts to mobilize all (universally) men for economic war against the middle and upper classes.
So while you mean well, it is either and error or facetious to cast Fascism as a model rather than a weapon of warfare.
Rothbardian Libertarianism cannot ‘admit’ that these are methods of war, because it would demonstrate RL disutility in war.
And we are well aware by now that Rothbardian Libertarianism is an attempt to escape costs for all commons necessary or not.
I think you are one of the best souls I have met in the community. But that does not mean you do not err out of cog. bias.
Even the saints are not perfect.
Fascism, Nationalism,Trade Policy are weapons of economic warfare. Violence has merely shifted into economics.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-17 04:46:00 UTC
Problem then is monopoly majoritarianism instead of houses for classes: trades.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-16 20:26:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754411820153176064
Reply addressees: @RonSchweinlach @hbdchick @SteveStuWill @JonHaidt @JonahNRO
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754304775156490240
IN REPLY TO:
@ronmcdouble
@curtdoolittle @hbdchick @SteveStuWill @JonHaidt @JonahNRO whats “not empirical”?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754304775156490240
Ironically perhaps: individualism destroyed possibility of expanding democracy.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-16 20:21:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754410756867756032
Reply addressees: @RonSchweinlach @hbdchick @SteveStuWill @JonHaidt @JonahNRO
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754304775156490240
IN REPLY TO:
@ronmcdouble
@curtdoolittle @hbdchick @SteveStuWill @JonHaidt @JonahNRO whats “not empirical”?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754304775156490240
Political compromise btw gender/class moved from in-family to houses of govt.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-16 20:19:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754410090845831172
Reply addressees: @RonSchweinlach @hbdchick @SteveStuWill @JonHaidt @JonahNRO
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754304775156490240
IN REPLY TO:
@ronmcdouble
@curtdoolittle @hbdchick @SteveStuWill @JonHaidt @JonahNRO whats “not empirical”?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754304775156490240
the market works for all by definition. Political uniformity does not
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-16 12:06:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754285964286160897
Reply addressees: @wef
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754261827882774529
IN REPLY TO:
@wef
Globalization for the 99%: can we make it work for all? https://t.co/14H4ODmTzU https://t.co/ebDbdDNIMp
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754261827882774529
LESSONS FROM TURKEY
Like I said, you can’t lie to your troops, or to your people (for long) in the information age.
Men moral enough to follow orders reliably, must have moral license to take control and dispense violence.
Therefore you need (a) to create intolerable conditions mandating action, (b) provide a solution for people to demand. (c) ask the military to impose them.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-16 11:23:00 UTC