Theme: Governance

  • POST “JOY DAY”: A RANT AGAINST OUR BRITISH KIN’S DECLINE INTO CONTINENTAL MARXIS

    POST “JOY DAY”: A RANT AGAINST OUR BRITISH KIN’S DECLINE INTO CONTINENTAL MARXIST SERFS

    (doh!) (ouch!)

    —“How would P be applied to the current monarch of the UK and her father in not keeping their subjects safe? ei well everything that has happened to the British and or ethnic English man in the last 80years.”—Joseph Williams

    First, P-constitution improves the american written constitution into a formal logic of our ancestral natural law, which is an improvement on the unwritten British constitution.

    Second, This constitution is entirely applicable to the UK as well as the US (or Canada, or Australia, or NZ). The only hard sell is getting Americans back on the monarchy train – although they’re getting closer at the moment. Washington turned it down unfortunately so we built an anti monarchical public mythos thats false. otherwise we would have just duplicated the British system.

    Third, if the monarch abandoned his or her duties to protect the people there is only one solution to that problem and only one solution we want – and that is the militia.

    Third, you British folks really piss me off with what I consider pretty stupid questions on this Monarchy. Why? You take the power away from the monarchy and then ask why it doesn’t protect you? You took away its power to protect you!

    (a) The British were wrong to contain Germany in both wars, (a Germany that stated repeatedly that Europe needed the British empire to survive) and paid the price for it with the loss of pretty much everything – including the status of reserve currency which made financing the empire possible. The people, beaten, turned (whimpering like pussies) to socialism like the germans rather than ‘manning up’ and keeping the empire as have the French and as did the Russians.

    (b) The monarchy was in the position because of this ‘socialism’ of being eradicated so has held on for dear life to survive the postwar period.

    (c) the english constitution(unwritten) is unlike the american (written), and the parliament has the ability (unlike the american) to alter the constitution. The parliament removed the ability of the monarchy to function as a judge of last resort and placed too much power in parliament – ending the long history of rule of law by traditional anglo saxon, germanic, proto germanic, western indo european law.

    (d) It’s not the monarchy’s fault, it’s the people’s fault – for not having the man-balls to protect the monarchy, and being too stupidly susceptible to marxist and french and jewish bullsh-t (false promise of freedom from physical and natural law) and full of their own arrogance that a parliament of the people without the constraint of rule of law, supreme court, and monarchy, could resist the attempt of the french to colonize Britain and drag her down with the rest of Europe.

    (e) so man up, saddle up, rally up, and

    … 1) get your constitution in written form

    … 2) limit the parliament to the constitutional constraints

    … 3) get your monarchy back in place as judge of last resort able to veto legislation, and dismiss parliaments that ever again act against the intersets of the people – people easily sold false promises – and to preserve the sovereignty that they have inherited from thousands of years of better men, and the prohibition on alienating themselves, the parliament, and the monarchy from those rights as a hierarchy of sovereigns.

    Man up. Show up. Fight to make your people great again. Otherwise the few of us Anglos on this side of the pond will have to come over there and teach you what the fuck a man is again. 😉

    We can reverse the catastrophe of the world wars and restore the benefits of the empire to our entire civilization, and all it’s defenses and values for all of us even if it’s only under the commonwealth.

    But we gotta man up like our ancestors to do it.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 17:06:00 UTC

  • 1) Fascism was a nationalist(european) reaction to counter global (jewish) commu

    1) Fascism was a nationalist(european) reaction to counter global (jewish) communism.

    2) Fascism was conceived as french socialism, and the nazis came closest to implementing it – although today’s france is not far off. The period saw the decline of religion (darwin within memory) and rapid change, so in european tradition, fascism was another attempt at a secular theology of state, given the strange european desire for authority that is alien to anglos.

    3) China is perhaps the best example of a fascist state practicing monopoly authoritarianism, nationalism, insulation from ‘corrupting’ influences, information control, state corporatism, militarism, and extremely tight coupling between state, finance, and industry. (note that the chinese like the germans are very happy with this situation).

    In other words, Fascism won the 20th century. Period.

    4) I use the term “Market Fascism” in the sense that there is zero tolerance for extra market coercion anywhere under P. This was meant as a tongue in cheek response to Islamic Fascism vs “the white law”, and to cue the audience to the severity with which free riding, rent seeking, baiting into hazard, and all the other leftist techniques would be illegal – leaving only exchanges as a means of cooperating.

    5) One of the most contra-jewish-libertarian properties of fascism is that profit at the expense of the commons or people was not permitted. We confuse this with autarky, but it was more that abitrages were not permitted – which is what americans want as well. And if a resource would be short in the country by higher profits out, that sale would be prohibited. The other contra-jewish-libertarian property is that they ended interest for consumers, and that the success of state-private industrial alliances are always beneficial since capital intensive industry is always taking a credit risk that only the state can reduce. This is why I would prefer the USA and UK were investing in battery research and factories and keeping the profits rather than externalizing them to the private sector. This is a principle problem with that is not true elsewhere. We fund all this basic research with public money but it is then privatized. In other words, why is consumer interests and privatization of public research returns handed out to the investment class rather than diminishing tax burdens of the people?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 13:54:00 UTC

  • STATE RELIGION? —“Would a P government endorse a religion?”–Tim Abbott P-law

    STATE RELIGION?

    —“Would a P government endorse a religion?”–Tim Abbott

    P-law allows the truthful reciprocal construction of any form of government and any economy as long as it’s stated in strictly constructed p-law.

    A continuation of the european sovereigns under rule of law by natural law of reciprocity, that we see in the proto-germanic, germanic, anglo saxon, english, british, american constitutions would yes, permit and possibly require a state religion.

    It would require compatibility with natural law. This leaves only traditional european religions (all of them), and christianity, and prohibits all others. And it posits chirstianity in scientific terms.

    In general, history has taught us that state religion is necessary, and so it appears we will have a set of state religions and state funding of religion as we do schools. Even though that religion will cover a broad spectrum of secular, pagan, and monotheistic christian religions.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 09:52:00 UTC

  • Yes the central problem I see is that german economy and finance is very vulnera

    Yes the central problem I see is that german economy and finance is very vulnerable, and the French have the only viable military in Europe. France has the will to rule europe’s future (badly) and Germany has been undermined (feminized?) into needing crisis to restore confidence.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 09:15:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223535450628993024

    Reply addressees: @RoemeltA @GrayConnolly

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1161038649045278722


    IN REPLY TO:

    @RoemeltA

    @GrayConnolly Only there’s not much “Teutonic” about this modern Teutonic core. The only thing the EU and this map have in common are border lines on paper. In reality there are not even borders.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1161038649045278722

  • Exactly. The world returns to normal after the end of the ‘cosmopolitan’ (one wo

    Exactly. The world returns to normal after the end of the ‘cosmopolitan’ (one world) fantasy made possible only by the american inheritance of the British empire, and american use of it’s economy to bribe the world into fighting communism. That postwar order has ended.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 09:13:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223534732903886848

    Reply addressees: @GrayConnolly

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100180222257725440


    IN REPLY TO:

    @GrayConnolly

    To the extent that Germany is indirectly restoring the Kaiserian hegemony (through the EU’s guise) and the Russians are trying to restore what was once Tsarist, the real parallels are not with any silly 1930s analogy but to the world before 1914.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100180222257725440

  • One does not negotiate with them. But with fellow citizens

    One does not negotiate with them. But with fellow citizens.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 08:52:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223529568113393665

    Reply addressees: @Gyrocunt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223469940398649344


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223469940398649344

  • i went thu a revolution in 2014. What would happen in the american government at

    i went thu a revolution in 2014. What would happen in the american government attacked it’s people in the open?

    It would be over.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 08:52:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223529435179159553

    Reply addressees: @Gyrocunt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223470756538933249


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223470756538933249

  • Yes the central problem I see is that german economy and finance is very vulnera

    Yes the central problem I see is that german economy and finance is very vulnerable, and the French have the only viable military in Europe. France has the will to rule europe’s future (badly) and Germany has been undermined (feminized?) into needing crisis to restore confidence.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 04:16:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/83890736_565311294065765_70532039950

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/83890736_565311294065765_7053203995094941696_o_565311290732432.jpg CULTURAL ENRICHMENT DEMANDING: “NO SUBWAY POLICE, FREE SUBWAYS”

    The demonstration was organized by a group that called across social media for a mass sabotage of the MTA.

    The action was led by an anti-police group that wants free subway rides and no officers patrolling the trains.

    As usual, the left vandalizes and commits violence so that they get the freedom for more violence and free riding, and vandalism, and theft.CULTURAL ENRICHMENT DEMANDING: “NO SUBWAY POLICE, FREE SUBWAYS”

    The demonstration was organized by a group that called across social media for a mass sabotage of the MTA.

    The action was led by an anti-police group that wants free subway rides and no officers patrolling the trains.

    As usual, the left vandalizes and commits violence so that they get the freedom for more violence and free riding, and vandalism, and theft.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 21:07:00 UTC

  • GOES AFTER FB FOR NOT SUPPRESSING ENOUGH CONSERVATIVE SPEECH Jan 31, 2020, 9:03

    https://dnyuz.com/2020/01/31/george-soros-mark-zuckerberg-should-not-be-in-control-of-facebook/SOROS GOES AFTER FB FOR NOT SUPPRESSING ENOUGH CONSERVATIVE SPEECH

    https://dnyuz.com/2020/01/31/george-soros-mark-zuckerberg-should-not-be-in-control-of-facebook/Updated Jan 31, 2020, 9:03 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 21:03:00 UTC