Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • HAS THE INTERNET MADE A DIFFERENCE IN THREAT PERCEPTION? —“Is anything differe

    HAS THE INTERNET MADE A DIFFERENCE IN THREAT PERCEPTION?

    —“Is anything different now — or has the internet just made us more AWARE of how the left rolls? For instance … if we were to apply our current knowledge of history to the standard history textbook of the 1980s, we would say “this is intolerable.” Or if we applied current understanding of inter-sexual dynamics to the dating marketplace of the 1990s (peak friendzone) we would say “this is intolerable.”—Michael Churchill

    Great question. A three part answer (a) yes we are more aware (b) we cannot threaten, argue with, silence, or exit them – because our interpersonal physicality and genetic status is invisible and inaccessible on the web – so GSRRM is more effective than physicality (c) yes they are a greater threat demographically because they think they can win (caused by obama)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 11:01:00 UTC

  • “I’m pretty sure there are enough of us to get the job done if necessary. Certai

    —“I’m pretty sure there are enough of us to get the job done if necessary. Certainly many of us are willing to die trying.”— Jeremy Standiford

    Yes, we need to state our objectives, those objectives need to solve the problem for right and center (and even some of the left) and we must convince them that it is the only win-win solution and that all others solutions are win lose .. and we’re happy to be the winners in win-lose scenarios. And then we need to show up in sufficient numbers. 100K is more than enough. 1M and its deterministically over on day one.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 10:29:00 UTC

  • Propertarianism is a methodology. You can use that methodology to produce a cons

    Propertarianism is a methodology. You can use that methodology to produce a constitution for any form of political order.

    We recommend various political configurations depending upon the conditions.

    Majoritarian monopoly voting has a very bad record. We improve it.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 02:07:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222702937996255232

    Reply addressees: @Semiogogue @PropertarianBoi @JohnMarkSays @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222699373743788037

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Semiogogue

    @PropertarianBoi @JohnMarkSays @EricLiford @curtdoolittle So people don’t vote in a Propertarian system?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222699373743788037

  • PEACE IS JUST WAR BY NON-MILITARY MEANS. We are always at war. Evolution is warf

    PEACE IS JUST WAR BY NON-MILITARY MEANS.

    We are always at war. Evolution is warfare. Politics and economics are simply productive means of warfare. Anglos domesticated economic warfare, but the chinese and europeans have broken it. Europeans domesticated military warfare but russians and iranians and muslims have broken it. And the Chinese are in the process of breaking it, so we are back to undomesticated warfare, of man against man huddling in subterranean tunnels trying to escape swarms of automated weaponry that will rapidly replace tanks and artillery.

    Peace is just war by non-military means.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 20:17:00 UTC

  • WHAT DOES “GO” MEAN: 1. A moral license – it has to be explained (the declaratio

    WHAT DOES “GO” MEAN:

    1. A moral license – it has to be explained (the declaration)

    2. A set of demands – they have to be published and made. (a constitution)

    3. A plan of transition – ( what it sounds like)

    4. A means of altering the status quo (incremental pressure to drive the parties to the table)

    I have a clear understanding of the means of political acceleration.

    I have a very clear understanding of the boogaloo strategy and have for years. The point is to make it so vividly certain it isn’t necessary – but you can’t fake it. The threat has to be a promise for it to work.

    If I have to, I”ll work at sounding very scary when the time comes. “And that is why you will agree to these terms in our mutual interest. Otherwise if we must fight to win, we will win, and our terms of settlement will worsen everyday”.

    And if we must, then we must, and if men are not willing to do what they must – they are not men worth having.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 18:50:00 UTC

  • The Lefist {female, progressive, consumptive} mind is overly obsessed with being

    The Lefist {female, progressive, consumptive} mind is overly obsessed with being left behind. This is why they want a one world order: so they don’t miss out on hyperconsumption. The conservative is just the opposite – we want to leave the *undesirables* behind.

    Separation.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 16:21:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222555467211210752

  • IN A PERFECT WORLD…. We want a monarchy with veto power if we can eventually g

    IN A PERFECT WORLD….

    We want a monarchy with veto power if we can eventually get one.

    We need a cabinet (a management team)

    We need a prime minister that is not a senator

    We need a senate (market for commons)

    This senate can only produce contracts between the states in matters of revenue, infrastructure, trade.

    The house is eliminated.

    The state is a corporation run by the management team,

    The divisions include the judiciary, the military-state-intel, the treasury, the insurer. The fed reserve is gone and pulled into the treasury.

    Each state shall have a governor, cabinet, senate(territory), upper house(business), and lower house(families)

    Each governor appoints two senators.

    The blue cities are forcibly converted to Free Cities(if we fight) or States(if we agree). All state lines are fungible on the neighborhood level. Any new state can be formed anew.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 11:28:00 UTC

  • All right left conflict is reducible to group strategy of eugenic families in me

    All right left conflict is reducible to group strategy of eugenic families in meritocratic market aristocracy under rule of law of heroism, and dysgenic individuals in equalitarian ant-market pseudoscientific and sophomoric priesthood and discretionary rule of victimhood.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 11:22:00 UTC

  • CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGE

    CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGENIC EQUALITARIAN AND STATIC

    For my followers: The P-constitution provides MATERIAL REWARDS at the cost of the media, financial, and political (unaccountable) sectors that have industrialized rent-seeking and baiting-into-hazard in the 20th century. It ALSO provides status – what Reactionaries really desire.

    Propaganda, pseudoscience, philo-sophism, and religion can all make people aware of opportunity for gain and provide(moral) justification for seizing it. But people seek to acquire: experience, consumption, capital, associations, status – and so political action requires rewards.

    Our difference: the Right seeks to produce goods, services, information, behavior, human capital, and commons in a majority middle class meritocracy (aristocracy), while the left seeks to extract from the middle to empower the top to redistribute to the bottom (priesthood).

    What is the unspoken Truth that is the purpose of the entire anti-western postwar movement, as well as the jewish pseudoscientific prewar movement (marx, freud, boas, cantor-bohr, trotsky)? That he right is eugenic and left dysgenic and that democracy is incompatible both.

    All right left conflict is reducible to group strategy of eugenic families in meritocratic market aristocracy under rule of law of heroism, and dysgenic individuals in equalitarian ant-market pseudoscientific and sophomoric priesthood and discretionary rule of victimhood.

    The end of the agrarian period also is an end to the agrarian economic, social, political, and military order. The europeans re-united the world and (unfortunately) the races and civilizations while still under the agrarian order. And we no longer have common interests we had under agrarianism. And everything is up for grabs.

    So we see market demand for re-speciation. And the only way to solve it is to once again, separate and continue to speciate – reversing the promise of the one world order the female, semitic, authoritarian mind seems to desire.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 10:43:00 UTC

  • CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGE

    CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGENIC EQUALITARIAN AND STATIC

    For my followers: The P-constitution provides MATERIAL REWARDS at the cost of the media, financial, and political (unaccountable) sectors that have industrialized rent-seeking and baiting-into-hazard in the 20th century. It ALSO provides status – what Reactionaries really desire.

    Propaganda, pseudoscience, philo-sophism, and religion can all make people aware of opportunity for gain and provide(moral) justification for seizing it. But people seek to acquire:experience, consumption, capital, associations, status – and so political action requires rewards.

    Our difference: the Right seeks to produce goods, services, information, behavior, human capital, and commons in a majority middle class meritocracy (aristocracy), while the left seeks to extract from the middle to empower the top to redistribute to the bottom (priesthood).

    What is the unspoken Truth that is the purpose of the entire anti-western postwar movement, as well as the jewish pseudoscientific prewar movement (marx, freud, boas, cantor-bohr, trotsky)? That he right is eugenic and left dysgenic and that democracy is incompatible both.

    All right left conflict is reducible to group strategy of eugenic families in meritocratic market aristocracy under rule of law of heroism, and dysgenic individuals in equalitarian ant-market pseudoscientific and sophomoric priesthood and discretionary rule of victimhood.

    The end of the agrarian period also is an end to the agrarian economic,social, political, and military order. The europeans re-united the world and (unfortunately) the races and civilizations while still under the agrarian order. And we no longer have common interests we had under agrarianism. And everything is up for grabs.

    So we see market demand for re-speciation. And the only way to solve it is to once again, separate and continue to speciate – reversing the promise of the one world order the female, semitic, authoritarian mind seems to desire.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 10:42:00 UTC