Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • “Some of the West’s people are tolerant of Cosmopolitan Jewish and Anglo Puritan

    —“Some of the West’s people are tolerant of Cosmopolitan Jewish and Anglo Puritan lies because we have members of the other classes who are still fearful of the aristocratic class.

    We must drive a wedge between them and the cosmopolitans and puritans. And it seems like this global employment and immigration crisis provides us with just that opportunity.

    The separate interests of the cosmopolitans and the lower classes of the host nation are becoming apparent – and with it, the lower classes are rebelling.

    The only group I see still tolerant of and allied to the Cosmopolitans is the academic class, most of whom are Underclass or Puritans because they academy has filtered out by intent and design the Aristocracy. But these ‘Secular Priests of Falsehood’ are still too afraid and confused about how they will survive, where they’ll go, what they’ll do once the people rebel against it.

    Showing them a plan during a transition would be helpful in getting them to decouple from the anti-commons crowd, too.”—Josh Jeppson

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-07 10:54:00 UTC

  • OF COURSE IT’S THE COSMOPOLITAN JEW’S FAULT FOR THE SECOND GREAT LIE, BUT ITS OU

    OF COURSE IT’S THE COSMOPOLITAN JEW’S FAULT FOR THE SECOND GREAT LIE, BUT ITS OUR FAULT FOR BEING OUT-GUNNED BY IT. ESPECIALLY BY THEIR ALLIANCE WITH OUR WOMEN AND PURITANS.

    There is blame for everyone in the enlightenment – perhaps the jews and French the most. As I say, don’t blame the innovator in warfare, blame those who are losign from not developing superior countermeasures because of underinvestment in weaponry.

    —“Ezra Pound had many clever ideas, but his faulting “Big Jew” was not one of them.”— Boris Miroslav Spacek

    He was correct that the cosmopolitans were the originators of the second ‘religious’ conquest of the west, this time by pseudoscience rather than by authoritarian mysticism.

    We have Aesop, Homer, Alexander, Aristotle, Aurelius, Machiavelli, Bacon, Locke, Smith, Hume, Jefferson, Maxwell, Darwin, Spencer, Menger, Nietzche, Hayek, and all those in between.

    But the cosmopolitans reacted to them with the Pseudoscientific Counter-Enlightenment: Boaz (anthropology), Freud (psychology), Marx (economics and sociology), Cantor(mathematical platonism), Mises (economic pseudoscience), Adorno/Frankfurt( anti-aristocratic aesthetics), Rand and Rothbard (anti-commons).

    And sold the pseudoscience to the female and underclass populace as a utopian scheme via the academy for profit, just as the mysticism was sold to the female and underclass via traveling preachers for profit: to rebel against the aristocracy that domesticated them out of ignorance, mysticism, tribalism, and poverty.

    So this is all merely a fact of history now, and the consequences of the first great lie: authoritarian mysticism, and the second great lie of critical pseudoscience are empirically observable as the destruction of common capital in all its forms.

    So no, he was not wrong.

    What he was wrong about, and what all subsequent generations have been wrong about, is that when one is confronted by an act of warfare wether by arms, by immigration(displacement), by economics, by conversion, or by information (falsehood), that one can be out-gunned-out-germed-out-steeled by immigration, economics, conversion, or informational propaganda as well as by force of arms.

    So that the failure to adapt to a new form of warfare is OUR FAULT, rather than the fault of the innovators of the new form of warfare.

    And this is not complicated.

    We have built western civilization into the FASTEST evolving civilization by the domestication of humans under our domain, through nothing more than the use of the common, natural, judge-discovered law, and the use of truth, empiricism, reason, arms and technology despite small numbers to do so. And we have dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of mysticism, ignorance, poverty, and starvation, and disease with those tools – and we profited from it. And there is no shame in that profiting.

    Compare the consequences of the use of western truth to domesticate man, and the consequences of the first reaction to aristocracy (scriptural religion), the second reaction to Aristotelian aristocracy (scriptural monotheism), and the third reaction to Baconian empiricism (pseudoscientific cosmopolitanism).

    Are jews responsible for the second and third great lies and the harm that they have done? Of course they are.

    Are we responsible for not yet advancing our law so that such lies are impossible to propagate through as aggressive punishment of that method of war and crime as every other method of war and crime?

    Yes, we are.

    So the jews are certainly to blame for much of the world’s reliance on the great lies, and the conflicts therefrom. But we are responsible for tolerating the great lies.

    The interesting question is… why are we tolerant of the great lies, either supernatural great lies, or pseudoscientific great lies?

    And why is it that the jews have learned to specialize in ‘the big lies’ as the Russians and Germans have so frequently observed?

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-07 09:26:00 UTC

  • WHEN THE PURITAN ANGLOS BECAME JEWS. The Problem Was the Puritan Diaspora After

    WHEN THE PURITAN ANGLOS BECAME JEWS.

    The Problem Was the Puritan Diaspora After The English Civil War.

    It’s actually True though. When the British developed the Empire, especially under Disraeli, they changed from an exploitative but domesticating Aryan and Burkeian Aristocracy, to a completely diasporic parasitic ethic very similar to the Jews.

    THAT’S WHY WE ARE FAILING. FOR THE SAME REASON AS THE JEWS ALWAYS FAIL: THE FAMILY AND COMMONS IS WHAT MATTERS.NOT PROFITS. INVESTMENT NOT CONSUMPTION.

    —“Oh you wise, wise man”—Rob De Geer

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 13:19:00 UTC

  • ARE ALL RACES AND TRIBES CAPABLE OF ARISTOCRACY? —“Curt do you think the non-w

    ARE ALL RACES AND TRIBES CAPABLE OF ARISTOCRACY?

    —“Curt do you think the non-whites are capable of the kind of aristocracies you want?”—Maeve Ahlström

    GOOD QUESTION:

    First, Aristocracy is the norm in history. The problem is not aristocracy per se, it is in domesticating a large enough percentage of the underclass, that the upper classes can productively organize the society by means of economic and natural law incentives, rather than lies, mysticism, coercion, bribery, serfdom or slavery.

    In other words, if you want to rule by truth, science, economics, and live in prosperity, rather than some other rule that imposes costs upon your people or your neighbors (including us) then you have no choice but to improve the quality of your stock by preventing harm to it through perpetuation of reproduction of those that inhibit the rest.

    We must remember that the lower classes are more disadvantageous than the upper classes are advantageous.

    So,

    1) it depends upon the size of the underclass

    2) it depends upon the distribution of spatial and verbal skills in upper demographics

    3) it depends upon the presence of some economic resource to fund it.

    4) therefore it should take no less than six or eight generations to make a meaningful difference to a population. And it would take more generations to equal what I assume were our 18th-century distributions

    Otherwise, given that as far as I can tell, all homo-sapiens-sapiens groups have diverged almost entirely by some degree of paedomorphic evolution, I can see no reason why not. We are no different from any other animals. We can be bred well and evolve paedomorphically, or we can breed chaotically and return to (relatively) prior states.

    Conversely, assuming we correct soon, there is no reason we cannot maintain a marginal advantage over all but the Chinese.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Cult of Sovereignty

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Science of Western Civilization

    The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 13:06:00 UTC

  • REVOLUTION: ENDING THE LIES, AND THE DESTRUCTION, OF THE DIASPORIC JEWS AND ENGL

    REVOLUTION: ENDING THE LIES, AND THE DESTRUCTION, OF THE DIASPORIC JEWS AND ENGLISH: THE COSMOPOLITANS AND THE PURITANS.

    The Amish, Mennonites, Mormons, and Quakers are our Equivalent of Orthodox Jews. And our Diasporic Puritans are our equivalent of Cosmopolitan Diasporic Jews.

    I’m from Puritan lineage. I’m happy to criticize my own when they are wrong. The Germans were right and the English were wrong and it’s just the Atlantic ocean opportunism of the Spanish, French, Dutch, and English, vs the cautious expansion of the North Sea civilization of the Hansa that determined which branch of Europeans dominated the modern era.

    We can, if we choose to, restore the Hanseatic Order of Europeans by depriving the Puritans and the Cosmopolitans of their tools of predation: 1) fiat credit, 2) spending of genetic, institutional, normative,and informational commons, and 3) by the distribution of parasitic utopian propaganda and the manufacture of ignorance.

    We can deprive them of those tools of warfare against us by the incremental suppression of their thievery, by the formal constitutional inclusion of the Informational Commons and Property in Toto, of which that commons is a member, and it’s most substantive investment.

    All we require is an amendment to the Constitution and sufficient violence to enforce it.

    And while I will shortly supply those amendments – revoking many and replacing most, it is up to moral men of all ages in all territories to use their wealth of violence to impose it and thereby restore our civilian order from conquest by fraud, where conquest by arms was never before possible.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Cult of Sovereignty

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Law of Western Civilization

    The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 12:43:00 UTC

  • I dunno if it’s just the kind of people that are attracted to my work but I swea

    I dunno if it’s just the kind of people that are attracted to my work but I swear that the most rational people are from Africa, South America, Russia, and Germany, and the Anglosphere is a completely ridiculous ideological bastion of ignorance and overconfidence made possible by the extreme wealth created by selling off a conquered continent. Thankfully there is a Hindu segment that is also exceptional. That just leaves the French, Chinese and the Muslims who are even crazier. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-05 11:59:00 UTC

  • ON INTELLIGENCE AND CHARACTER IN POPULATIONS (it’s all domestication) IQ = Intel

    ON INTELLIGENCE AND CHARACTER IN POPULATIONS

    (it’s all domestication)

    IQ = Intelligence Quotient. Meaning the weighted test of demonstrated velocity of problem solving and knowledge accumulation, in both the spatial-temporal and verbal articulation abilities – which while a subset of the (large, perhaps 80-ish) number of various capabilities of the human brain, appears to provide a marginally indifferent measure – apparently because all other abilities seem to scale roughly with those two.

    Moreover, for reasons we are beginning to understand, the distribution of sexual dimorphism (androgens), and the degree of paedomorphic domestication, seems to influence the distribution of these talents in each population with feminine verbal skill and greater number of tasks and male greater spatial skill and greater specialization being general trends both of which are visible in prevalence of female solipsism and male autism. So if we control for sexual dimorphism, we control for depth and rate of sexual maturity, and we control for the success and shrinking the underclasses through agrarianism and climate, we seem to provide a sufficient explanation of the differences in all races and tribes and classes and genders by fairly simple selection processes whereby our cultural habits have greater and more rapid evolutionary dynamics than random mutation or (minimal if at all) epigenetic mutation.

    In other words, we’ve been domesticating each other for a couple million years, thereby incrementally delaying or limiting maturity, and then selecting for male or female(Slavic and northern European and Chinese) and male (African and middle eastern, and steppe) biases based largely upon climate, disease gradient, and means of agrarian production.

    And it seems that through selection and eugenics (aggressive hanging in the west, and aggressive killing in the east) plus the softer eugenics of diligence required for both rice farming and farming through 50th latitude winters, plus the western delay of reproduction until able to obtain access to land under manorialism – allowing women to work – at least since the 700’s if not 1500bc, that some groups have just been superior at limiting their underclasses, while redistributing reproduction upward to their middle (genetic, not economic) classes.

    The universe operates by very simple rules. We just make excuses for what’s necessary in the circumstance and call it ‘moral’.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-04 08:56:00 UTC

  • The state of Connecticut is little more than an old age home for white people wi

    The state of Connecticut is little more than an old age home for white people with a black cleaning staff.

    Thank you democrats for what cancer you have made. Genocide.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 16:27:00 UTC

  • “The NYT died a long time ago. It’s been a propaganda organ for forces of displa

    —“The NYT died a long time ago. It’s been a propaganda organ for forces of displacement by immigration ever since. …. Its persistence depends upon the calculation-gap that the Left’s anti-social parasites rely on: they still have accumulated western genetic, cultural, institutional, and territorial capital they’re burning through before this American project finally fails and they can’t mathematically or economically support propaganda anymore”— Josh Jeppson

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 08:17:00 UTC

  • (note to self) FRENCH MATERNAL LINES (Farmers) — France>NovaScotia>Quebec>Maine

    (note to self)

    FRENCH MATERNAL LINES (Farmers)

    — France>NovaScotia>Quebec>Maine>Connecticut

    — Sirois : Sih-ROY, or SEER-oh-way in the states.

    — Theriault, Theery-o, or Tair-ee-oh in the states

    — Ouellette, (her line English Wells origin) Well-ET.

    — Blanchette, Blann-SHET

    Emma Sirois married Eugene Theriault 1900.

    Delia Blanchette married Joseph Ouellette.

    Maternal line Family history is all written but it is in french and i cannot read it – and the author (a great uncle) is too aged to translate it.

    The only English I’ve been able to read is about these people Theriault and his sons, and these were good ‘Gaulish’ men that were diligent in helping others in the community (village so to speak) with one story (newspaper) that they would check on town families after deep snow and help dig them out or bring them supplies.

    Although my Grandmother was a font of stories about growing up in an era of horses and wagons, where we still lived ‘the old way’. Including scarlett fever, and the spanish flu. Houses burning down from lamps and candles. Large families in small houses. Sleeping three in a bed to keep warm.

    My mother’s side is ‘very french’ and very ‘farmer-class’ – so much so that for the WASP side of the family – including me – other than my grandmother, most of that side of the family was ‘alien’. The women would get together, cook, and I would sit under the kitchen table listening to them. (My mother has a Master’s Degree. But I doubt there are many degrees, entrepreneurs, authors, preachers, lawyers, soldiers, and generals before her generation like there are on my paternal side.

    My English Upper Middle-Class Martial Class Puritan Protestant father was threatened with disinheritance if he married my French earth-working Class Near-Serfdom Class Catholic mother.

    My Maternal grandfather was a big strong man with a Gaul’s nose. His English was passable, but his hearing was damaged by one of the illnesses early in the century, so he was incomprehensible to me.

    When young looked far more like my English and Scandinavian heritage but as I age I realize that I increasingly look like one of the (severe, judgmental) Sirois – who my mother has no kind words for.

    My Sister Ellen and I have more Scandinavian, and my other sister Jean more French. And I find this whole gene expression thing fascinating. I wish that the Jewish pseudoscientists had been less effective selling Boaz, Freud, and Cultural Marxism to the unwashed and generations of women newly liberated from housework by electricity and machines.

    Fascinating that in a century we have made such a great change.

    interesting that the cause of it is petroleum products. And that the resource is not infinite or sustainable.

    We forget that oil is equivalent to our discovery of Mastodon’s – and that while we can survive on either, they both can run out.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 08:08:00 UTC