Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • A PARADIGM SHIFT IN RACE THEORY —“If there is a true paradigm shift in race th

    A PARADIGM SHIFT IN RACE THEORY

    —“If there is a true paradigm shift in race theory, then I believe [Curt Doolittle’s] work fits the bill. Many recent trends in race theory take care to maintain a possibility for respect between free peoples on a diverse planet, and Curt’s work follows this trend. “— Adam Voight

    For those who are new to my work, my position, which fits the science, is this:

    That the only meaningful differences between the races that influence our abilities to function under the same myths, ideas, norms, laws, institutions, and economies, are the product of:

    1. the success or failure of different groups to eugenically constrain the rates of reproduction of their underclasses, yielding a median distribution that is easier or more difficult to incorporate into advanced skills, ideas, cultures, economies, and states.

    2. that the eugenic evolution of more advanced cultures and races is due to paedomorphic evolution: selecting for the extension of sexual immaturity in humans, just as we selected for domestication of animals by extension of sexual immaturity.

    3. that between the major races, minor races, racial tribes, and genetic classes, the differences are expressed as:

    a) the degree of sexual dimorphism (how different are the genders)

    b) the distribution of sexual dimorphism (distribution of gender biases)

    c) the rate of sexual maturity and the depth of sexual maturity;

    4. That both Sinic (Han/Korean/Japanese) and Aryan (European) aristocracy was successfully able to profit from the organized domestication of man due to military excellence, trade routes, and waterways.

    5. That the west, despite being smaller in number, poorer, at the limit of the Bronze Age informational diaspora, quite by accident, chose Sovereignty among peer warriors, rather than Monopoly, and from that choice only ‘markets’ in all their forms permit the preservation of Sovereignty. And from this one choice, the market for debate, decision, commons, economies, knowledge allowed more rapid calculation of adaptation and innovation in both the ancient rational world, and in the modern empirical world, with the millennium of mysticism separating them the only failure. Ergo, the west is simply faster than the rest because ‘markets in everything’ produce faster evolution than any other strategy that humans are capable of.

    6. That this technology of domestication by markets and law, by limiting the reproduction of the underclasses, is just as adoptable as any other institutional and technological system the West has developed. And so no Race, Nation, or People is prohibited from freedom and prosperity so long as they adopt this strategy for six or more generations.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-02 10:31:00 UTC

  • “I posted something in this group a few months ago about why I no longer use “ra

    —“I posted something in this group a few months ago about why I no longer use “race” in a biological context, but instead refer to “continental ancestry”.— Adam Voight

    interesting

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-02 08:37:00 UTC

  • UNWINDING THE LIE: WE WERE CONQUERORS, NOT IMMIGRANTS #tlot #tcot #nrx #newright

    UNWINDING THE LIE: WE WERE CONQUERORS, NOT IMMIGRANTS
    #tlot #tcot #nrx #newright #conservative https://t.co/6OuVLaqmgx

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-30 14:27:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/792734730760388611

  • THE LIE: WE WERE CONQUERORS, NOT IMMIGRANTS #tlot #tcot #nrx #newright #conserva

    https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/792734730760388611/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=792734730760388611UNWINDING THE LIE: WE WERE CONQUERORS, NOT IMMIGRANTS

    #tlot #tcot #nrx #newright #conservative https://t.co/6OuVLaqmgx

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-30 10:28:00 UTC

  • Berens on the Axial Age The Axial Age Origins of Western Dynamism —“The ‘Faust

    Berens on the Axial Age

    The Axial Age Origins of Western Dynamism

    —“The ‘Faustian Soul’/Martial Spirit of the West was inherited from the bronze-age steppe raiders (IE). Steppe lands and a pastoral way of living selects for aggression. And with the invention of chariot warfare, the IE where able to dominate/out compete/conquer neighboring peoples. During this period, religious justification goes from “we live in a world of uncertainty and we should work together” to “we have agency and can act to change our condition (just like the gods).”

    It is important to note the origin of the western ethos, which incentivized dominance, truth, hyper-agency (sovereignty). Naturally, this spawned resistance movements or counter-enlightenments, which–as reactions–responded with submission, lies, and collectivism.

    Furthermore, the martial spirit, or propensity for dominance, permeates every aspect of traditional occidental society. When we channel dominance, rather than suppress it, to productive ends–what we call a market for heroism–we increase the velocity of the production of commons. We limit the expression of dominance through natural law (prohibitions on predation & parasitism) , so that the only means to acquire status is through production (this includes production of commons: information, cultural, aesthetic, defense, etc).

    The West benefited from creating a market for dominance (heroism). The rest either suppressed dominance (River Lands/Flood Plains), or resisted domestication (desert lands/ harsh lands).”—James Augustus Berens

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 22:31:00 UTC

  • “They Aryan mind: limiting emotional input (noise)(laundering bias), so our calc

    —“They Aryan mind: limiting emotional input (noise)(laundering bias), so our calculations reflect the natural more accurately and so we act more effectively, and so that our wills are expressed more clearly (hyperagency) We transcended the animal, the instinctual, the emotional.”—James Augustus Berens

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 22:27:00 UTC

  • “Post modern consumer culture. It’s the only way to have a multiethnic capitalis

    —“Post modern consumer culture. It’s the only way to have a multiethnic capitalist society is if all ties to group identity are stripped away and systematically replaced. I suggest watching the Curtis documentary “The century of the self”. We’re seeing a new ethnic competition in the United States because of immigration. It takes a few decades to strip away people’s identities and render them into pure consumers.”–Murray Sell

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 18:35:00 UTC

  • ARYAN (EUROPEAN) GROUP EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY IN 500 WORDS (important piece) (thi

    ARYAN (EUROPEAN) GROUP EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY IN 500 WORDS

    (important piece) (this is it – everything)

    If it’s merely a transfer, it isn’t profit, and it isn’t earned – it’s stolen.

    A profitable business *creates* new wealth by productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, limited to productive externalities.

    Both buyer and seller *and everyone else* has more of something than when they started or they wouldn’t have done voluntarily made the exchange.

    By limiting our externalities to the productive, we obtain the implicit consent of the sovereign to benefit them without the cost of their involvement, and without our concern for the possible cost of their retaliation.

    And they will retaliate against any cost imposed upon that in which they have an interest. And they have an interest in anything that they have paid for either with life and limb, family and relations, material goods, effort and attention, or forgone opportunity for satisfaction.

    And they pay these costs for life, mates, offspring, kin of various distances(necessary existential), several property (monopoly existential), shareholder property (quantified existential), common property (unquantified existential), institutional property (operationally existential) – including education and ritual, normative property (intangible but demonstrably existential); informational property(intangible and demonstrable upon use), monumental property (existential but unconsumable) – high arts; and territorial property and the resources therein (necessary, and existential, unquantified, unconsumable).

    in exchange for sovereignty and by consequence property, we grant one another sovereignty and by consequence property. And the cost we bear for doing so is: telling the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth; impose cost on the expenditures of others neither by inaction or action; and by consequence limiting our actions to those which produce only productive, fully informed, voluntary transfers, limited to productive externalities; and the reciprocal insurance of everyone else’s sovereignty, and by consequence, property by paying the cost of diligently policing, word and deed for every word and deed we are aware of.

    But even the exchange of Sovereignty is but a strategicl utility: it is the method by which those who are existentially, demonstrably, superior in ability and deed, to preserve their superiority in ability and deed by combining with numbers of others of superiority in ability and deed, in ever increasing numbers, to transcend themselves, man, beast, earth, and all possible under their possible dominion, from beast, to man, to the very gods they aspire to be.

    This is the philosophy of the west. It derives from one principle: by heroic sacrifice, in the form of demonstrating our excellence, largely in the form of willing risk, we pay for the franchise of sovereignty, and western civilization derives from that one principle.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

    ( ps: yes, it matters that it takes me so long because this kind of simplicity is the output of years and years of work. )

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 09:21:00 UTC

  • (speculative uncomfortableness) —“What do you think is the evolutionary reason

    (speculative uncomfortableness)

    —“What do you think is the evolutionary reason for Jews exhibiting relatively poor spatial aptitude when compared to European gentiles? I understand the basis for the selective pressure within Jewish communities for a certain level of verbal and math prowess, I’m just lost why that didn’t carry over to visuospatial ability?”—

    The only theory that makes any sense and corresponds with the data, is that they selected for feminine traits in men: memory for memorizing the doctrine, and verbal acumen for arguing Jewish laws, and interpreting scripture, and dealing with contracts – as well as perception in judging character. This is probably why they have such a high percentage of homosexuals, and even heterosexual often Jews exhibit what we think of as feminine traits: hence the (admittedly exaggerated) principle: “All Jews are female”.

    Imagine that out of every 150 people we got the smartest guy to have as many kids as we could afford, to pay for, as long as he would teach us his knowledge in exchagne, and act as a judge in matters of dispute? How many generations would that take? It takes a lot fewer than you’d think. Humans evolve quickly under intentional selection. In just two hundred years the affect would be dramatic.

    So Jews started out as a Semitic people, meaning with higher alertness (which is interesting) and higher aggression, and then some moved to the west, married western wives, within just a generation or two started inbreeding, and use extremely (good) eugenic reproduction, but selected for what we call feminine traits: memory and excellence at expression.

    Why do jews pursue a female reproductive strategy? (rallying and shaming, running, and … well, not engaging in the most productive of businesses so to speak). Becuase it’s high return.

    So, they evolved themselves to do so. The reason is lost in history, but pastoral sheep herders from arid regions tend to have many competitors and demonstrate (high) particularlism. The group has NEVER been able to hold a decent military, nor hold property for long periods. Nor form a durable, advanced, centralized government.

    We evolved to pursue a relatively balanced relationship between males and females for reasons that I think we understand. Scarce populations in cold climates are more dependent upon one another.

    The asians we do not know the reason for their skill set, other than they have dramatically lowered their testosterone and sexual maturity and obtained longer lives for doing so.

    Muslims chose a more masculine one. Exaggeratedly so, and did so LATE in history, so like any technology they have the most recent.

    (each group’s history is pretty interesting in this regard).

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 15:07:00 UTC

  • DEFINITIONS: PARTICULARISM VS UNIVERSALISM Particularism: “Exclusive attachment

    DEFINITIONS: PARTICULARISM VS UNIVERSALISM

    Particularism: “Exclusive attachment to one’s own group, party, or nation.”

    1) Individualism vs Collectivism …(PROPERTY)

    2) Particularism vs Universalism .(PEOPLE)

    3) Nationalism ..vs Globalism …..(GOVERNMENT)

    ——————————————————–

    ….MASCULINE..VS…FEMININE

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 14:36:00 UTC