ARE ALL RACES AND TRIBES CAPABLE OF ARISTOCRACY?
—“Curt do you think the non-whites are capable of the kind of aristocracies you want?”—Maeve Ahlström
GOOD QUESTION:
First, Aristocracy is the norm in history. The problem is not aristocracy per se, it is in domesticating a large enough percentage of the underclass, that the upper classes can productively organize the society by means of economic and natural law incentives, rather than lies, mysticism, coercion, bribery, serfdom or slavery.
In other words, if you want to rule by truth, science, economics, and live in prosperity, rather than some other rule that imposes costs upon your people or your neighbors (including us) then you have no choice but to improve the quality of your stock by preventing harm to it through perpetuation of reproduction of those that inhibit the rest.
We must remember that the lower classes are more disadvantageous than the upper classes are advantageous.
So,
1) it depends upon the size of the underclass
2) it depends upon the distribution of spatial and verbal skills in upper demographics
3) it depends upon the presence of some economic resource to fund it.
4) therefore it should take no less than six or eight generations to make a meaningful difference to a population. And it would take more generations to equal what I assume were our 18th-century distributions
Otherwise, given that as far as I can tell, all homo-sapiens-sapiens groups have diverged almost entirely by some degree of paedomorphic evolution, I can see no reason why not. We are no different from any other animals. We can be bred well and evolve paedomorphically, or we can breed chaotically and return to (relatively) prior states.
Conversely, assuming we correct soon, there is no reason we cannot maintain a marginal advantage over all but the Chinese.
Curt Doolittle
The Cult of Sovereignty
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Science of Western Civilization
The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 13:06:00 UTC
Leave a Reply