Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • J-Bias, Anglicans vs Jews

      The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is higher than the the jewish IQ: 112) The jewish distribution is WIDER (13.1 vs 11.1), with more at the bottom and more at the top. So they produce an extra 10% above 130, and it is 130 and 140’s that provide executive (130) and academic (140) competitive ability.

    The size of the world jewish population is about 6.5m. World anglican population is about 85m. Jews pursue a narrower set of careers than Anglicans/Episcopalians. Jews practice more nepotism. And Jewish excellence, which is verbal, is in demand in an era of mass communication. So, Anglicans are white equivalent of the jews (which we have known for 400 years, and is why we had the scientific revolution in britain, and both the English and Scottish enlightenments). If whites returned to practicing nepotism, and outlawed lying in the commons by involuntary warranty of due diligence, and elminated financialization – all of which are easy, the numbers would stabilize. My observation which I cannot find research to confirm or deny is that jews (“all jews are female”) have not only obtained female verbal ability, but the abilty of women to work on details for long periods of time. This ‘reverse dimorphism’ combined with culling of the underclasses, upward redistribution of reproduction to rabbis, extereme clannishness and nepotism, and specialization in extractive (immoral) professions explains the statistical differences. So, anglicans choose a wider distribution of careers, are not nepotistic but universal, and produce about as many outliers. Jews are people of words, deception, and mysticism, and europeans are people of metalsmithing, truth, and magic. We still specialize in our ancient traditional occupations.

  • “DO WHITE MEN FIND WOMEN OUTSIDE THEIR RACE ATTRACTIVE?”— (This seems like a v

    —“DO WHITE MEN FIND WOMEN OUTSIDE THEIR RACE ATTRACTIVE?”—

    (This seems like a very strange question. lol All women are attractive – especially at 19-23 years. It’s the whole point of being female. 😉 )

    THE CORRECT ANSWER

    Let me help you: **We are men**. **Every woman** that is healthy, and reasonably fit, and reasonably symmetrical (height weight proportionate) is attractive. (Just as every men who can garner attention from others and who possesses some wealth is attractive to women. supermodels and men in professional sports, or attractive professional women and wealthy entrepreneurs. Same everywhere. )

    DIFFERENCES IN THE FREQUENCY OF DESIRABLE FEATURES

    Of the *major* races and subraces ( african, semitic, iranic, western, indian, eastern, pacific) we vary greatly in our degree of neoteny (retention of childhood traits) that are associated with fertility (and desirability) for no other reason than the geography we evolved in – with cold favoring neoteny, and hot, not so. So some races tend to have more FREQUENTLY desirable features than other races while all races tend to produce some desirable women. (The aboriginals in australia have a low frequency of those traits, and east-slavic women have a high frequency of those traits. with celtic, german, and scandinavian women having a lower frequency than slavic women, but producing more extremes.)

    DEGREES OF NEOTENY DUE TO REGIONS

    The reason being that the desire for neoteny is high across all populations. East asians have the most neoteny but perhaps too much which is why the asymmetric demand for asian women vs men. Westerners have less morophlogical neoteny, and tend to retain higher demand for females than males in appearance, even if higher demand for males in behavior. This is true for indians as well. For Iranic and semitic the demand is lower for both males and females becuase of greater retention of sexual depth and maturity. And africans mature the fastest and the deepest, because they are in the most biologically hostile part of the world where children must mature quickly or die.

    PRACTICALITY

    We men are also **practical**: marrying within six degrees is ALWAYS better than the alternative for every possible reason, unless your own sexual market value is too low within six degrees.

    (Lastly, and … unpleasantly perhaps, white men (although they will not admit it openly) operate under the belief that ‘women from lower classes’ are ‘cheaper and easier and require less effort’. I don’t actually think this is true. I think it’s just that in-group sensitivity to rejection is higher.)

    OUTMARRIAGE RATES

    So what we find in the west is about 15% outmarriage (racial mixture) with predictable overlap between black-hispanic, hispanic-white, white-asian, and asian-jewish populations. the reason being that at the top and bottom of each ‘tribe’, a ‘defector’ can obtain a higher sexual market value outside his or her group.

    How do we know this? You wouldn’t believe how many people study this stuff and how exceptionally good that the data is – especially from all the dating sites.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 12:44:00 UTC

  • My answer to How much of the resentment that blacks feel towards whites and that

    My answer to How much of the resentment that blacks feel towards whites and that whites feel towards Jews is ultimately due to the lower average IQ of the lower performing group? https://www.quora.com/How-much-of-the-resentment-that-blacks-feel-towards-whites-and-that-whites-feel-towards-Jews-is-ultimately-due-to-the-lower-average-IQ-of-the-lower-performing-group/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 12:34:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033694142063357953

  • My answer to How much of the resentment that blacks feel towards whites and that

    My answer to How much of the resentment that blacks feel towards whites and that whites feel towards Jews is ultimately due to the lower average IQ of the lower performing group? https://www.quora.com/How-much-of-the-resentment-that-blacks-feel-towards-whites-and-that-whites-feel-towards-Jews-is-ultimately-due-to-the-lower-average-IQ-of-the-lower-performing-group/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=8fe34dfa

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 12:34:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033694084517572608

  • THE SECRET TO JEWISH SUCCESS: EXTREME FEMINISM THE CORRECT ANSWER Jews have, mor

    THE SECRET TO JEWISH SUCCESS: EXTREME FEMINISM

    THE CORRECT ANSWER

    Jews have, more successfully than all other peoples, and somewhat by accident of selective upward redistribution of reproduction, transferred feminine cognitive ability (language and perception) to the males, and male cognitive ability(agency) to females, at the cost of higher rates of homosexuality and mental illness, and lower rates of creativity. (yes, really) This ‘blending’ of traits combines the best of both worlds.

    The mistake is to think that they are necessarily more exceptional than our most exceptional whites (Anglicans). Anglicans produce higher average IQ. But the Jews produce more outliers because of a wider standard deviation in their distributions. And they practice nepotism on a scale that westerners can’t imagine – the same way women advance their children.

    There is quite a bit of work studying these things now. So it’s getting much easier to explain the differences. I try to explain Jewish behavior by saying “all Jews are female” and while that’s an exaggeration it does explain the entirety of Jewish success: adopting the female cognitive, collective, and reproductive strategy.

    This is probably the most explanatory argument available today.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 11:42:00 UTC

  • WE GOT WHAT WE LET HOSTILE PEOPLES ASK FOR We are at war. A very nearly hot civi

    WE GOT WHAT WE LET HOSTILE PEOPLES ASK FOR

    We are at war. A very nearly hot civil war. A civil war brought about by design, beginning in the postwar period, and one that would not have succeeded in overthrow except for underclass, and particularly Hispanic immigration. All liberal societies pursue commercial interests to the point of undermining the society. This is what separates military (armies) states from trading (naval) states: armies do not tolerate imposition of costs upon the civic order.

    When at war, people demand generals. And every single time any civilization has pursued liberalism to the point where they undermine the homogeneity of the population they have died at the hands of conflicts btween despots.

    Becuase only a despot can rule over competing peoples.

    And we now have at least four hostile demographics in at lesat ten culturally separate regions.

    You get what you ask for.

    We got what we let HOSTILE PEOPLES ask for.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 11:15:00 UTC

  • IN NOBEL PRIZES —Have you come across this before? It is a research paper aime

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229007550_The_Jewish_Bias_of_the_Nobel_PrizeBIAS IN NOBEL PRIZES

    —Have you come across this before? It is a research paper aimed at better understanding the Jewish bias in Nobel awards.—by Lisa Outhwaite

    Yes, lisa, and I think most of us know this. “Heaping of Undue Praise” and “Activist Nepotism”. A high school clique popularity context.

    –‘It is expected that the national frequency of Nobel Laureates should correlate with the average National IQ, but this is not the case. However, the literary production of a country correlates significantly with the frequency of laureates in that country (Figure 3 insert). The number of granted patents correlates significantly with the national IQ, but not with the number of Nobel laureates. The size of the Jewish population in a country has no significant effect on that country’s intellectual activity, measured as National IQ, book production or patenting. ‘—

    —‘Networking behind the J-bias When the policy decision has been made by the Nobel Assembly, already in February, it is up to the extended Nobel Committee (16 persons) to choose from the short list of candidates. At this stage the most important factor is the number and status of the scientists who support a particular nominee. A nominee with many or weighty supporters will probably be the finally selected one. And it is here that Jewish scientists can and do use of their talent for networking (with other Jews) and their exceptional verbal intelligence. ‘—

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229007550_The_Jewish_Bias_of_the_Nobel_PrizeUpdated Aug 26, 2018, 10:08 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 10:08:00 UTC

  • There is no superior race, just superior distributions that make use of superior

    There is no superior race, just superior distributions that make use of superior ideas.

    Thee jews, despite being the most literate people in the dark and middle ages (a darkness they contributed to) achieved precisely NOTHING.

    Every Jewish achievement was made by their nearly forcible indoctrination into aristotelianism, in exchange for integration.

    They managed to produce the most murderous ideas in ancient history (judaism, christianity, islam), and the most murderous ideas in modern history (marxism), and the pseudosciences and deceits of the modern world (boasianism, fruedianism, cantorian supernaturalism in mathematics, the frankfurt school, and nearly single handedly destroyed both the academy and rule of law. And have nearly destroyed our civilization thrrough the 1965 immigration act, and their continuing efforts at making the world safe for judaism, which roughly transates to turning the world into the levant.

    The ONLY thinker they have is Einstein and he is overplayed because everything other than the Frame was the product of Europeans – even E=MC^2. He did manage to explain why. But he is their only non-pseudoscentific thinker. There are plenty of minor players, and a masterful effort for nepotism in the awards process. But data is data is data.

    Europeans did everything worth doing in history and did it faster for the simple reason that we tell the truth, —- and on one else does.

    So no, I don’t play superiority games, I just look the data.

    It’s notable that Babbage and Turing were Brits, and the Logicians were frequently Jewish, and so was Chomsky’s grammatical take on Turing. Turns out the logics were a total waste of time – there is no closure. Turns out mathematical set theory (logic) was harmful. Turns out the Grammars have far more to do with Turing than Chomsky.

    Everything is easily explained by jewish pilpul, pseudoscience, pseudomathematics, and psuedo-logic, versus anglo testimony, science, mathematics, and computation.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 09:42:00 UTC

  • ANGLICANS VS JEWS The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is h

    ANGLICANS VS JEWS

    The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is higher than the the jewish IQ: 112)

    The jewish distribution is WIDER (13.1 vs 11.1), with more at the bottom and more at the top. So they produce an extra 10% above 130, and it is 130 and 140’s that provide executive (130) and academic (140) competitive ability.

    The size of the world jewish population is about 6.5m. World anglican population is about 85m.

    Jews pursue a narrower set of careers than Anglicans/Episcopalians. Jews practice more nepotism. And Jewish excellence, which is verbal, is in demand in an era of mass communication.

    So, Anglicans are white equivalent of the jews (which we have known for 400 years, and is why we had the scientific revolution in britain, and both the English and Scottish enlightenments).

    If whites returned to practicing nepotism, and outlawed fictionalism in the commons by involuntary warranty of due diligence, and elminated financialization – all of which are easy – the numbers would stabilize.

    My observation which I cannot find research to confirm or deny is that jews have not only obtained female verbal ability, but the abilty of women to work on details for long periods of time. This ‘reverse dimorphism’ combined with culling of the underclasses, upward redistribution of reproduction to rabbis, extreme clannishness and nepotism, and specialization in extractive professions explains the statistical differences.

    So, anglicans choose a wider distribution of careers, are not nepotistic but universal, and produce about as many outliers.

    Jews are people of words, cunning, and mysticism, and europeans are people of metalsmithing, truth, and magic. We still specialize in our ancient traditional occupations.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 09:25:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/40110062_287156571881240_75675331706

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/40110062_287156571881240_7567533170673844224_n_287156568547907.jpg http://helmuthnyborg.dk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Publ_2009_The-Intellligence-Religiosity-Nexus.pdfhttp://helmuthnyborg.dk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Publ_2009_The-Intellligence-Religiosity-Nexus.pdf

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 08:48:00 UTC