THE SECRET TO JEWISH SUCCESS: EXTREME FEMINISM
Jews have, more successfully than all other people, and somewhat by accident of selective upward redistribution of reproduction transferred… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=287207388542825&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 15:42:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033741427673579520
Germans do not achieve excellence by radical IQ as do the Anglos, they achieve it by Truth, Duty, and Piety. You can’t learn IQ, but you can learn Truth, Duty, and Piety. And if you HAVE IQ nothing stops you from ALSO adopting Truth, Duty, and Piety.
Germans do not achieve excellence by radical IQ as do the Anglos, they achieve it by Truth, Duty, and Piety. You can’t learn IQ, but you can learn Truth, Duty, and Piety. And if you HAVE IQ nothing stops you from ALSO adopting Truth, Duty, and Piety.
—Have you come across this before? It is a research paper aimed at better understanding the Jewish bias in Nobel awards.—by Lisa Outhwaite https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229007550_The_Jewish_Bias_of_the_Nobel_Prize Yes, lisa, and I think most of us know this. “Heaping of Undue Praise” and “Activist Nepotism”. A high school clique popularity context. –‘It is expected that the national frequency of Nobel Laureates should correlate with the average National IQ, but this is not the case. However, the literary production of a country correlates significantly with the frequency of laureates in that country (Figure 3 insert). The number of granted patents correlates significantly with the national IQ, but not with the number of Nobel laureates. The size of the Jewish population in a country has no significant effect on that country’s intellectual activity, measured as National IQ, book production or patenting. ‘— —‘Networking behind the J-bias When the policy decision has been made by the Nobel Assembly, already in February, it is up to the extended Nobel Committee (16 persons) to choose from the short list of candidates. At this stage the most important factor is the number and status of the scientists who support a particular nominee. A nominee with many or weighty supporters will probably be the finally selected one. And it is here that Jewish scientists can and do use of their talent for networking (with other Jews) and their exceptional verbal intelligence. ‘—
—Have you come across this before? It is a research paper aimed at better understanding the Jewish bias in Nobel awards.—by Lisa Outhwaite https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229007550_The_Jewish_Bias_of_the_Nobel_Prize Yes, lisa, and I think most of us know this. “Heaping of Undue Praise” and “Activist Nepotism”. A high school clique popularity context. –‘It is expected that the national frequency of Nobel Laureates should correlate with the average National IQ, but this is not the case. However, the literary production of a country correlates significantly with the frequency of laureates in that country (Figure 3 insert). The number of granted patents correlates significantly with the national IQ, but not with the number of Nobel laureates. The size of the Jewish population in a country has no significant effect on that country’s intellectual activity, measured as National IQ, book production or patenting. ‘— —‘Networking behind the J-bias When the policy decision has been made by the Nobel Assembly, already in February, it is up to the extended Nobel Committee (16 persons) to choose from the short list of candidates. At this stage the most important factor is the number and status of the scientists who support a particular nominee. A nominee with many or weighty supporters will probably be the finally selected one. And it is here that Jewish scientists can and do use of their talent for networking (with other Jews) and their exceptional verbal intelligence. ‘—
( http://helmuthnyborg.dk//srv/htdocs/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Publ_2009_The-Intellligence-Religiosity-Nexus.pdf ) There is no superior race, just superior distributions that make use of superior ideas. Thee jews, despite being the most literate people in the dark and middle ages (a darkness they contributed to) achieved precisely NOTHING. Every Jewish achievement was made by their nearly forcible indoctrination into aristotelianism, in exchange for integration. They managed to produce the most murderous ideas in ancient history (judaism, christianity, islam), and the most murderous ideas in modern history (marxism), and the pseudosciences and deceits of the modern world (boasianism, fruedianism, cantorian supernaturalism in mathematics, the frankfurt school, and nearly single handedly destroyed both the academy and rule of law. And have nearly destroyed our civilization thrrough the 1965 immigration act, and their continuing efforts at making the world safe for judaism, which roughly transates to turning the world into the levant. The ONLY thinker they have is Einstein and he is overplayed because everything other than the Frame was the product of Europeans – even E=MC^2. He did manage to explain why. But he is their only non-pseudoscentific thinker. There are plenty of minor players, and a masterful effort for nepotism in the awards process. But data is data is data. Europeans did everything worth doing in history and did it faster for the simple reason that we tell the truth, —- and on one else does. So no, I don’t play superiority games, I just look the data. It’s notable that Babbage and Turing were Brits, and the Logicians were frequently Jewish, and so was Chomsky’s grammatical take on Turing. Turns out the logics were a total waste of time – there is no closure. Turns out mathematical set theory (logic) was harmful. Turns out the Grammars have far more to do with Turing than Chomsky. Everything is easily explained by jewish pilpul, pseudoscience, pseudo-mathematics, and psuedo-logic, versus anglo testimony, science, mathematics, and computation.
( http://helmuthnyborg.dk//srv/htdocs/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Publ_2009_The-Intellligence-Religiosity-Nexus.pdf ) There is no superior race, just superior distributions that make use of superior ideas. Thee jews, despite being the most literate people in the dark and middle ages (a darkness they contributed to) achieved precisely NOTHING. Every Jewish achievement was made by their nearly forcible indoctrination into aristotelianism, in exchange for integration. They managed to produce the most murderous ideas in ancient history (judaism, christianity, islam), and the most murderous ideas in modern history (marxism), and the pseudosciences and deceits of the modern world (boasianism, fruedianism, cantorian supernaturalism in mathematics, the frankfurt school, and nearly single handedly destroyed both the academy and rule of law. And have nearly destroyed our civilization thrrough the 1965 immigration act, and their continuing efforts at making the world safe for judaism, which roughly transates to turning the world into the levant. The ONLY thinker they have is Einstein and he is overplayed because everything other than the Frame was the product of Europeans – even E=MC^2. He did manage to explain why. But he is their only non-pseudoscentific thinker. There are plenty of minor players, and a masterful effort for nepotism in the awards process. But data is data is data. Europeans did everything worth doing in history and did it faster for the simple reason that we tell the truth, —- and on one else does. So no, I don’t play superiority games, I just look the data. It’s notable that Babbage and Turing were Brits, and the Logicians were frequently Jewish, and so was Chomsky’s grammatical take on Turing. Turns out the logics were a total waste of time – there is no closure. Turns out mathematical set theory (logic) was harmful. Turns out the Grammars have far more to do with Turing than Chomsky. Everything is easily explained by jewish pilpul, pseudoscience, pseudo-mathematics, and psuedo-logic, versus anglo testimony, science, mathematics, and computation.
The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is higher than the the jewish IQ: 112) The jewish distribution is WIDER (13.1 vs 11.1), with more at the bottom and more at the top. So they produce an extra 10% above 130, and it is 130 and 140’s that provide executive (130) and academic (140) competitive ability.
