Theme: Ethnoculture

  • “Alien immigration is genetic terrorism.”—Reece Edward Haynes

    —“Alien immigration is genetic terrorism.”—Reece Edward Haynes


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-23 14:53:00 UTC

  • “Why do so many white parents still oppose school integration efforts?”— BECAU

    —“Why do so many white parents still oppose school integration efforts?”—

    BECAUSE INTEGRATION PRODUCES EVEN WORSE OUTCOMES.

    1 . Races **mature at different rates and depths.** From… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=285098462087051&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-23 13:31:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1032621244267593728

  • “Why do so many white parents still oppose school integration efforts?”— BECAU

    —“Why do so many white parents still oppose school integration efforts?”—

    BECAUSE OF CONFLICT. BUT PLEASE READ AND LEARN.

    1 . Races **mature at different rates and depths.** From fast to slow: Black, Mixed, White, Asian. Rate of maturity determines (a) aggression, (b) sensitivity to signaling (c) compliance, (d) attention. With blacks beginning as early as kindergarden. The races differ in testosterone levels by rates of development Black, mixed, white, asian).

    2. **Racial differences** in physical, spatial, and verbal **trait expression** are as great as **gender differences** in physical, spatial, and verbal trait expression. (Sitting is more harmful to the cognitive and social development of black and brown boys than utilitarian for white and east asian girls.)

    3. **Proximity Creates Hostility**. Diversity is not a good. Conflict, Status Competition, and Violence between groups increases rapidly when in proximity because of differences.

    4. Differences in the **median behavior of racial groups** are largely difference in the sizes of the classes. There is a *huge* difference in underclass size between black, brown, white,( jewish), and east asian. In other words, while there is about a half standard deviation between the median of the four major ethnic groups, this means that the vast majority of black and brown students are from the underclasses, laboring classes, and working classes – and whites, jews, and asians from the lower middle, middle, upper middle classes.

    5. Differences between the **classes** is determined by distribution of (a) Trait Industriousness and Orderliness, (b) Trait Intelligence (intelligence is best treated as a personality trait), (c) Rates and Depth of Maturity (Neoteny). (d) religion and parent’s class. (Class rotation exists but it small, because it is genetic, and is usually up or down by one rank.)

    6. Races, classes, and genders, overwhelmingly tend to seek (demonstrate) **behavioral norms of their group’s majority **(median), for the simple reason that Signals (status signals, association, cooperation, reproductive, cohabitation signals) are “cheaper and easier” within group (by kin selection) than across group.

    7. This means nothing more than that it’s NOT RACE BUT KIN SELECTION, **CLASS, MATURITY, AND SIGNALING,** competition and that White and Asian parents prefer not to have their children adopt LOWER CLASS BEHAVIORS.

    8. Lower class behaviors tolerate **higher impulsivity** (lower self discipline, or what we call ‘Agency’), whereas the principle differences between class behaviors are suppression of impulse and conformity. in other words, stoicism increases linearly with class.

    Or for the room temperature IQ crowd: We pretend race and class don’t matter. But of race and class, it is CLASS that matters regardless of race. “When you train good dogs and bad dogs together, the bad dogs don’t get better, the good dogs get worse.” That adage applies to humans as well.

    And that is why parents oppose it

    No one objects to upper middle class anyone anywhere in the world, which is why the upper middle class professionals readily move around the world and integrate without any difficulty. Everyone everywhere in the world objects to integrating with laboring and underclasses. And frankly, the evidence is that those classes are fine AS LONG AS NOT FORCED TO INTEGRATE.

    **THERE IS VERY LITTLE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SCHOOL AND PRISON.**

    And we see the same results.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-23 09:30:00 UTC

  • ARE WHITES MORE VIOLENT?”– –Q:Curt, Is the white race violent naturally or wer

    https://www.quora.com/Is-the-white-race-violent-naturally-or-were-they-taught-to-be/answer/Curt-Doolittle–“CURT: ARE WHITES MORE VIOLENT?”–

    –Q:Curt, Is the white race violent naturally or were they taught to be?”— Quora User

    ( https://www.quora.com/Is-the-white-race-violent-naturally-or-were-they-taught-to-be/answer/Curt-Doolittle )

    I’m going to give you the best, most scientific answer that is currently available. You may or may not like it. But to the best of my knowledge it’s unassailable.

    1 – The white race is empirically LESS violent than all other races. (sorry. fact.) We currently attribute this to the facts that (a) limited survival of the underclasses in harsh winters, (b) the aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year (heavy intolerance for crime), (c) high sexual dimorphism combined with lower levels of testosterone and therefore lower levels of impulsivity and aggression, (d) higher demonstrated creativity which appears to be a genetically influenced personality trait (curiosity, ‘worry’, and industriousness). (e) greater freedom (for men) to compete in the dominance hierarchy.

    2 – The white race is empirically superior at the application technology, voluntary cooperation, planning, and maneuver to the use of violence, thereby allowing smaller numbers of warriors to defeat superior and wealthier numbers.

    3 – The white race has empirically used the application of violence to create markets that in turn increase wealth.

    The white race’s superiority in ancient and modern ages is because of the use of violence and technology to create markets.

    4 – The white race’s superiority at producing arts, sciences, and technologies is because of their discovery of ‘deflationary truth’. (What we call scientific or empirical truth, that evolved from ‘reporting’ or ‘testifying’ rather than opining, elaborating, or conflating – regardless of cost to the self or others.)

    5 – The white race’s discovery of ‘deflationary truth’ was caused by the use of the militia, that indoctrinated all free men into the use of military and technological epistemology. This means that all mean of property were trained to some degree, and all the wealthier families were professionally trained, to use horse, bronze, and wheel, to maneuver.

    6 – The white race’s use of militia forced meritocracy, and meritocracy forced ‘sovereignty’, and sovereignty forced the natural law of voluntary reciprocity, and use of the natural law forced markets in everything: the jury, freedom of association, of cooperation, of cooperative production, of reproduction (Marriage), of production of commons (government), of polities (competing rule).

    7 – The white race (North Sea Peoples) evolved the only government without governors: Rule of Law, by Natural Law, incrementally discovered by independent professional judges, and recorded in the Common Law of Torts, with judicial decidability provided by the changes in state of Property in Toto, where Property in Toto was determined by the bearing of costs to obtain an interest without imposing a cost upon the costs born by others. This form of law evolves faster than all alternatives, and leaves the least opportunity for the evolution of all forms of parasitism and predation. (Or it did until 20th democracy eliminated Rule of Law.)

    8 – So to answer the question, while whites are demonstrably less violent, they are demonstrably more cooperative, with demonstrably higher trust in one another, producing lower risk and friction, allowing greater risk, allowing greater returns, and thereby evolving technologies both institutional, normative, commercial, and technological, faster than all other civilizations. This is why the west, despite being on the edge of the bronze age, evolved fastest in the ancient world, and fastest in the modern world, with the dark ages of religiously enforced ignorance causing a thousand year delay in world innovation.

    9 – However, it is probably more correct to view white people as more patient and disciplined and industrious – probably due to four or more millennia of selection pressures above the 40th parallel – and therefore suppressing petty violence in exchange for expression of superior exceptional violence. But again, this may be for the simple reason that except for Han, Korean, and the Japanese, White People are the most genetically homogeneous, genetically isolated, genetically domesticated, for the simple reason that they have systematically eradicated their lower classes.

    10 – The white race was able to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, tyranny, poverty, starvation, and disease, one civilization at a time, by the application of sovereignty (property), markets, technology, truth, using violence to do so. Evolution is unkind to primitive organisms. primitive social organizations, and primitive ideas.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, UkraineUpdated Aug 23, 2018, 7:55 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-23 07:55:00 UTC

  • Not Radical Individualism, but Individual Sovereignty and Intolerant Familialism

      —“And I’ll be the first to concede that radical individualism is indeed problematic when you’re faced with collectivists who want you gone, but I do think that individualism is ideal after the threat has been adequately dealt with, and is in keeping with the general ethos of the West.”–Matthew Genack Radical individualism is just an attack on the very commons that made western civilization competitive. Individual Sovereignty, and Radical Familialism is a better strategy.

  • Not Radical Individualism, but Individual Sovereignty and Intolerant Familialism

      —“And I’ll be the first to concede that radical individualism is indeed problematic when you’re faced with collectivists who want you gone, but I do think that individualism is ideal after the threat has been adequately dealt with, and is in keeping with the general ethos of the West.”–Matthew Genack Radical individualism is just an attack on the very commons that made western civilization competitive. Individual Sovereignty, and Radical Familialism is a better strategy.

  • NOT RADICAL INDIVIDUALISM, BUT INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY AND INTOLERANT FAMILIALISM

    NOT RADICAL INDIVIDUALISM, BUT INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY AND INTOLERANT FAMILIALISM

    —“And I’ll be the first to concede that radical individualism is indeed problematic when you’re faced with… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=283540518909512&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-21 20:19:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1031999191357243393

  • “Curt: What About Slavs?”

    —“Hey, Curt! I saw Propertarianism.org lists the faults of various groups (Germanic/Anglo/French). I notice an absence of Slavs in this analysis. Is that coming soon? -Aleksa”— Um. I can’t do Slavs as a group, I can do western (poles and west ukrainians) and eastern (Russian) and southern (Old Europeans). For western slavs, I mean, there is literally nothing to criticize. We can only ask them to continue to form west slavic civilization by uniting slavic countries separately from germanic and mediterranean and russian. My research says that poland in particular should be right behind germany with time. Since RUSSIANS USED LITERATURE and did not engage in ‘philosophy’ or ‘new theology’ or ‘pseudoscience’, and because russian literature represents the ultimate literature of Christendom, it is actually quite hard to criticize Russians on argumentative grounds. (I do have to mention however the strange Russian preoccupation with magic, pseudoscience, and conspiracy theory). The problem with Russians is not that they want to restore orthodoxy and restore Byzantium to christian hands, but that they invaded eastern europe, have not developed a middle class, the resulting high trust peoples, and resulting high trust bureaucracy and the resulting court system that defends the people from oligarchs, the state, and each other. This is in progress and will require a generation or two assumng no further setbacks. In particular russian resistance to democracy and their success at exiting jewish influence has put Russia on a path superior to the west. But like Eastern Europe she just needs time. Southern slavs in old europe (byzantium) are rather odd for reasons I am still struggling to understand.

  • “Curt: What About Slavs?”

    —“Hey, Curt! I saw Propertarianism.org lists the faults of various groups (Germanic/Anglo/French). I notice an absence of Slavs in this analysis. Is that coming soon? -Aleksa”— Um. I can’t do Slavs as a group, I can do western (poles and west ukrainians) and eastern (Russian) and southern (Old Europeans). For western slavs, I mean, there is literally nothing to criticize. We can only ask them to continue to form west slavic civilization by uniting slavic countries separately from germanic and mediterranean and russian. My research says that poland in particular should be right behind germany with time. Since RUSSIANS USED LITERATURE and did not engage in ‘philosophy’ or ‘new theology’ or ‘pseudoscience’, and because russian literature represents the ultimate literature of Christendom, it is actually quite hard to criticize Russians on argumentative grounds. (I do have to mention however the strange Russian preoccupation with magic, pseudoscience, and conspiracy theory). The problem with Russians is not that they want to restore orthodoxy and restore Byzantium to christian hands, but that they invaded eastern europe, have not developed a middle class, the resulting high trust peoples, and resulting high trust bureaucracy and the resulting court system that defends the people from oligarchs, the state, and each other. This is in progress and will require a generation or two assumng no further setbacks. In particular russian resistance to democracy and their success at exiting jewish influence has put Russia on a path superior to the west. But like Eastern Europe she just needs time. Southern slavs in old europe (byzantium) are rather odd for reasons I am still struggling to understand.

  • “CURT: WHAT ABOUT SLAVS?” —“Hey, Curt! I saw lists the faults of various group

    “CURT: WHAT ABOUT SLAVS?”

    —“Hey, Curt! I saw http://Propertarianism.org lists the faults of various groups (Germanic/Anglo/French). I notice an absence of Slavs in this analysis. Is that coming… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=282321709031393&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-20 13:52:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1031539500323930113