Just as french write informal universalist secular theology of the feminine, and germans write formal universalist philosophy that is secular theology of harmony, the russians write masculine very informal nationalist propaganda as a secular theology of the masculine. These are the result of geographic location and cultural history. While yes my implementation of rule of law is pretty intolerant, and I jokingly refer to my work as either rule of law fascism or market fascism, and while I advocate for nationalism, and restoration of the anglosphere – remains of the british empire – to create the scale necessary for preservation of the defense of the sea trade between our continents – my work is also in large part dispassionate. So where duggin has his ambitions, writes, speaks, and argues passionately and romantically in what I consider nonsense-propaganda, I write in pretty rigorous analytic argument dispassionately and unromantically. And this lack of romance and passion – my anglo empiricism – is not what the passionate market wants me wo write. What the young passionate male mind wants is an heroic and often esoteric secular-religious vision. Yet I’m just updating the founding fathers, with their formality and martial reserve. So in that sense whether french feminine passive aggressive essay, german rational inspirational harmony, russian low trust machismo, and anglo high trust empirical, and chinese face-before-truth authoritarian, or jewish feminine undermining using magical thinking to bait into hazard, we are all arguing for our futures in a world returning to normal after a century of jewish intellectual pseudoscience and sophistry in marxism, syndicalism, postmodernism, feminism, libertarianism, neoconservatism – a sequence of attempts by the jewish counter-revolution against the empirical revolution and it’s darwinian consequences. They sought to capture europa for their ends just as the french, germans, and russians sought to capture it for their ends. They have failed. Or it will be evident shortly that they failed. So I see the world differently, that we are all turning to the masculine defense of our peoples and cultures after the undermining and destruction of the leftist feminine attempts to use european wealth, and christian tolerance, to turn the world into another middle eastern equalitarian desert under totalitarian feminine presumption that knitting-circle consensus and harmony is possible, or that continued knitting circle gossip and undermining among usurers of our civilization is possible. It isn’t. It’s Magical thinking.
Theme: Ethnoculture
-
We Are All Turning to The Masculine Defense of Our Peoples and Cultures
Just as french write informal universalist secular theology of the feminine, and germans write formal universalist philosophy that is secular theology of harmony, the russians write masculine very informal nationalist propaganda as a secular theology of the masculine. These are the result of geographic location and cultural history. While yes my implementation of rule of law is pretty intolerant, and I jokingly refer to my work as either rule of law fascism or market fascism, and while I advocate for nationalism, and restoration of the anglosphere – remains of the british empire – to create the scale necessary for preservation of the defense of the sea trade between our continents – my work is also in large part dispassionate. So where duggin has his ambitions, writes, speaks, and argues passionately and romantically in what I consider nonsense-propaganda, I write in pretty rigorous analytic argument dispassionately and unromantically. And this lack of romance and passion – my anglo empiricism – is not what the passionate market wants me wo write. What the young passionate male mind wants is an heroic and often esoteric secular-religious vision. Yet I’m just updating the founding fathers, with their formality and martial reserve. So in that sense whether french feminine passive aggressive essay, german rational inspirational harmony, russian low trust machismo, and anglo high trust empirical, and chinese face-before-truth authoritarian, or jewish feminine undermining using magical thinking to bait into hazard, we are all arguing for our futures in a world returning to normal after a century of jewish intellectual pseudoscience and sophistry in marxism, syndicalism, postmodernism, feminism, libertarianism, neoconservatism – a sequence of attempts by the jewish counter-revolution against the empirical revolution and it’s darwinian consequences. They sought to capture europa for their ends just as the french, germans, and russians sought to capture it for their ends. They have failed. Or it will be evident shortly that they failed. So I see the world differently, that we are all turning to the masculine defense of our peoples and cultures after the undermining and destruction of the leftist feminine attempts to use european wealth, and christian tolerance, to turn the world into another middle eastern equalitarian desert under totalitarian feminine presumption that knitting-circle consensus and harmony is possible, or that continued knitting circle gossip and undermining among usurers of our civilization is possible. It isn’t. It’s Magical thinking.
-
“We solve social science in three generations. Hayek-Mises > Rothbard-Hoppe > Do
“We solve social science in three generations.
Hayek-Mises > Rothbard-Hoppe > Doolittle. Jewish(Mises-Rothbard, pilpul, diasporics)> German (Hoppe, rationalism, german free cities)> Anglo-German (Hayek-Doolittle, empirical, anglo-germanic empires).”
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-22 22:05:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253082535669760002
Reply addressees: @judicialist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253077258887139328
-
Ancapism is just the jewish ghetto ethics of the pale: extractive usury
Ancapism is just the jewish ghetto ethics of the pale: extractive usury.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-22 21:32:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253074131727396864
Reply addressees: @judicialist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253067468165259266
-
(Double Density: NY: 27k/sq mi vs Stockholm: 13k/sq mi, Opposite cleanliness, Op
(Double Density: NY: 27k/sq mi vs Stockholm: 13k/sq mi,
Opposite cleanliness,
Opposite housing and family,
Opposite social order (manners, ethics, morals),
Opposite behavioral distribution (Non-conform vs Conform),
Opposite demographic distribution,
Heterogenous vs Homogeneous.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-22 19:20:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253040962856681475
Reply addressees: @EdeninMiami @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252985695322464256
-
Propertarian Society = Western Civilization Prior to our Infection by the second
Propertarian Society = Western Civilization Prior to our Infection by the second abrahamic undermining of mankind. https://t.co/2SQnqtvRdI

Source date (UTC): 2020-04-22 13:23:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252951077600755712
-
THE DRAG ON CIVILIZATION BY NON-WESTERN SENSE MAKING —“Given the trajectory we
THE DRAG ON CIVILIZATION BY NON-WESTERN SENSE MAKING
—“Given the trajectory western civilization was on over the last century or two, we should’ve been building stuff on the moon, making and using powered exoskeletons, and using quantum computing by now. But instead here we are having to care for those who haven’t so much as invented a wheel in 1500 years, placating to the whims of our weakest willed and minded, and letting perversion run wild. This time we’ll make sure it changes for good, like John Mark says in some of his videos, our children will never have to fight this fight ever again.”—Shane Walter
—“We spent too much time in the last century averaging for lowest common denominator.”—Robert Danis
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-22 10:38:00 UTC
-
THE ROMAN EXAMPLE OF EUROPEAN THOUGHT by Francesco Principi (important) The clai
THE ROMAN EXAMPLE OF EUROPEAN THOUGHT
by Francesco Principi (important)
The claim that the Roman Empire was a legally sanctioned multiracial state is another common rhetorical figure used by cultural Marxists to create an image of the West as a civilization that has long worked to create a universal race humanity mixed. This is a lie to which the patriots of Western Civilization must not yield.
Rome’s greatest contribution to Western Civilization was the development of a formal-rational legal order characterized by the logical consistency of its laws, the precise classification of its different types of law, the precise definition of its terms, and its a process that leads to the formulation of specific rules in which questions were asked, various responses from jurists were collected, and coherent solutions were offered. It was a legal system engaged in judicial decisions based on impartiality and fairness for all citizens.
Basically what the Romans did was to apply Greek philosophy, in particular the Aristotelian inductive logic of moving from experience to certainty, putting together the common elements in the particular cases observed.
However, it would be a serious mistake to imagine Roman citizenship as a conscious effort by ethnic Romans to recognize the common humanity of all ethnic groups. First, the extension of citizenship was part of the process of Romanization, acculturation and integration of the peoples defeated in the empire; it had been conceived as a political measure to ensure the loyalty of the defeated peoples, and the acquisition of citizenship took place gradually, with the promise of further rights with greater assimilation; and, until the end, not all Roman citizens had the same rights, with the Romans and Italics in general enjoying a higher status.
Secondly, it is worth noting that this process of Romanization and expansion of citizenship was effective only in the Western (Indo-European) half of the Empire, whose inhabitants were White; while in the East, in relation to the non-Italic inhabitants of Egypt, Mesopotamia, Judea and Syria, this had only superficial effects.
There is clearly a link between rationalization and universalization that generates an abstract language that reveals a common humanity. This is the reason why Western thinkers always write in terms of “man”, “humanity”, even if they actually think of themselves, be they Greeks, Romans, or Germans.
**Westerners have created a universal language in view of becoming the only people on this planet to employ their rational faculties in an autonomous way of legislating in terms of their precepts, passing over the particularities of time, custom, and lineage and learning to reason on universal issues. The Europeans are the true thinkers of this planet, the only ones who have freed their minds from extra-rational burdens and needs, to face the big issues “objectively” from the point of view of the “top view”, typical of no one in particular. But we must realize that it is the vision of the only European man.**
Therefore, it would be anachronistic to project on the Romans a program similar to our current reality of immigration / diversity, a projection implemented with the conscious aim of undermining European pride and identity and of creating a mixed-race population. Cultural Marxism in control of our universities are simply using deceptive arguments to make Europeans think that what is happening today is part of the natural course of Western Civilization. This form of intellectual manipulation of students is now rampant in academia.
Civic nationalism was uniquely Western, but it is important to be aware that the current pathological obsession of the West with diversity as dating back to the Greek or Roman era is a mistake. In an attempt to understand our immigration policies and obsession with diversity, we would achieve important results. The sensible response that should be reached in examining the debate between civic and ethnic nationalism is that historical research validates the idea that European nation-states were founded around a strong ethnic core, even if there were minorities coexisting with majorities. Western European states have developed liberal civic institutions within this ethnic core. The inclination of human beings is to have a preference for their fellow men.
To say that this preference is an irrational disposition imposed from above by a regressive elite is false. Ethnocentrism is a rational disposition compatible with civil liberties. Civil liberties are in line with a collective sense of ethnic-cultural belonging.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-22 05:32:00 UTC
-
It’s that they’re fastidious, homogenous, therefore have incentive to be recipro
It’s that they’re fastidious, homogenous, therefore have incentive to be reciprocal, and wearing masks etc is an ordinary habit regularly practiced.
Japan still retains imperial, national, martial, responsible-for-commons, familial morality – rather than universalism.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 13:48:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252594999683960835
Reply addressees: @adamnewsum9 @SiliconEdge
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252535410577731590
-
This means if it’s genetic, as it is in our women,it’s irreparable, and separati
This means if it’s genetic, as it is in our women,it’s irreparable, and separation is the only possibility. If it’s purely cultural (doesn’t appear to be) then it’s a matter of separating from their culture. Either way we have to outlaw it by requiring truthful reciprocal speech.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 12:01:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252568114656677889
Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter @JonHaidt @berggruenInst
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252567628062826496
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@TruthRespecter @JonHaidt @berggruenInst So if Jewish war on western-sensemaking, our realism, naturalism, operationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity, testimony, commons, and eugenics, is a continuation of their ancient world rebellion against the masculine empires, and an involuntary rebellion against evolution-eugenics.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1252567628062826496