Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • Again, I’ll point out that integrated and loyal A’s are exceptional, and as a hi

    Again, I’ll point out that integrated and loyal A’s are exceptional, and as a high iq/verbal acuity individual I have more socially in common than most of my own. It’s politics that differ.

    And yes, I am sure you’re right. it’s the activist feminine mind that’s the problem.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 13:43:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253680847816929281

    Reply addressees: @unfinis06265716 @YouTube

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253680225977806849

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @unfinis06265716 @YouTube Of course. I won’t name names, but I have a close friend who is important in our movement that pays a high price for it with family and fellows.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1253680225977806849

  • We have a number of great Ashkenazim in the movement. They’re all the same. They

    We have a number of great Ashkenazim in the movement. They’re all the same. They recognize the intuition but don’t give into it. And they retain the Tribe’s verbal excellence. IMO solving the LOYALTY issue solves the behavior just like it does in Married Women.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 13:39:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253680034222661635

    Reply addressees: @unfinis06265716 @YouTube

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253678255015464960

  • What are some key traits and talents of Ashkenazi Jews who can specialize in Pro

    What are some key traits and talents of Ashkenazi Jews who can specialize in Propertarian strict construction https://propertarianism.com/2020/04/24/what-are-some-key-traits-and-talents-of-ashkenazi-jews-who-can-specialize-in-propertarian-strict-construction/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 13:38:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253679622375583747

  • What are some key traits and talents of Ashkenazi Jews who can specialize in Propertarian strict construction?

    RE: The Choice Episode 0005 – Our Civilization’s Next Great Enterprise Thank you for sharing. One question: What are some key traits and talents of Ashkenazi Jews who can actually specialize in Propertarian strict construction while in public?(130+ IQs, cognitive masculinity, < 35-yrs-old, maleness, >$60k/yr., etc.?)

    [T]here are good people and bad people in every group. It’s just IQ, Cognitive Masculinity: eschewing attention, priority for system(group) rather than empathy(individual), solving for Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth before Preference or Face, and Purity, Loyalty, and Hierarchy. The question is, whether the degree to which the Ashkenazim are cognitively feminine in each influence: Genetics, Religion, Tradition, and Culture. (German jews had almost fully integrated pre-war, such that “presbyterians and jews were indistinguishable.”) Evidence says genetic. If it’s genetic then as I’ve suggested our laws must evolve to protect against cognitively female anti-social and social-criminal behavior (Undermining, Seduction,False promise, Baiting into Hazard, Magical Thinking). But it is difficult to imagine females or Ashkenazim changing. But it’s certainly possible. And if we change law and education so that people are as aware of criminality, including female anti-social and interpersonal and social criminality, then we should be able (over time) to suppress it as we have suppressed other anti-social behavior.

    I have an interminable hunch that cognitively masculine Ashkenazis are disproportionately under-supported, whereas cognitively feminine Ashkenazis are disproportionately astro-turfed. Not sure whether to introduce this idea ONLY to S.T.E.M.-specialist Jews.

    Of course. I won’t name names, but I have a close friend who is important in our movement that pays a high price for it with family and fellows. Again, I’ll point out that integrated and loyal A’s are exceptional, and as a high iq/verbal acuity individual I have more socially in common than most of my own. It’s politics that differ. And yes, I am sure you’re right. it’s the activist feminine mind that’s the problem. unfinished

    Creating at least 1 syllabus (featuring no combative language) through which >130IQ Ashkenazis can master Propertarianism can inexpensively help Jews begin to realize that your vision can conditionally upgrade Jews’ immediate & long-term safety, prosperity.

    1) Excellent idea. I’ve written extensively but audio will work as well. Will do. 2) Why did you link Youtube in this tweet?

  • What are some key traits and talents of Ashkenazi Jews who can specialize in Propertarian strict construction?

    RE: The Choice Episode 0005 – Our Civilization’s Next Great Enterprise Thank you for sharing. One question: What are some key traits and talents of Ashkenazi Jews who can actually specialize in Propertarian strict construction while in public?(130+ IQs, cognitive masculinity, < 35-yrs-old, maleness, >$60k/yr., etc.?)

    [T]here are good people and bad people in every group. It’s just IQ, Cognitive Masculinity: eschewing attention, priority for system(group) rather than empathy(individual), solving for Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth before Preference or Face, and Purity, Loyalty, and Hierarchy. The question is, whether the degree to which the Ashkenazim are cognitively feminine in each influence: Genetics, Religion, Tradition, and Culture. (German jews had almost fully integrated pre-war, such that “presbyterians and jews were indistinguishable.”) Evidence says genetic. If it’s genetic then as I’ve suggested our laws must evolve to protect against cognitively female anti-social and social-criminal behavior (Undermining, Seduction,False promise, Baiting into Hazard, Magical Thinking). But it is difficult to imagine females or Ashkenazim changing. But it’s certainly possible. And if we change law and education so that people are as aware of criminality, including female anti-social and interpersonal and social criminality, then we should be able (over time) to suppress it as we have suppressed other anti-social behavior.

    I have an interminable hunch that cognitively masculine Ashkenazis are disproportionately under-supported, whereas cognitively feminine Ashkenazis are disproportionately astro-turfed. Not sure whether to introduce this idea ONLY to S.T.E.M.-specialist Jews.

    Of course. I won’t name names, but I have a close friend who is important in our movement that pays a high price for it with family and fellows. Again, I’ll point out that integrated and loyal A’s are exceptional, and as a high iq/verbal acuity individual I have more socially in common than most of my own. It’s politics that differ. And yes, I am sure you’re right. it’s the activist feminine mind that’s the problem. unfinished

    Creating at least 1 syllabus (featuring no combative language) through which >130IQ Ashkenazis can master Propertarianism can inexpensively help Jews begin to realize that your vision can conditionally upgrade Jews’ immediate & long-term safety, prosperity.

    1) Excellent idea. I’ve written extensively but audio will work as well. Will do. 2) Why did you link Youtube in this tweet?

  • The question is, whether the degree to which the Ashkenazim are cognitively femi

    The question is, whether the degree to which the Ashkenazim are cognitively feminine in each influence: Genetics, Religion, Tradition, and Culture. (German jews had almost fully integrated pre-war, such that “presbyterians and jews were indistinguishable.”) Evidence says genetic.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 13:29:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253677342578409472

    Reply addressees: @unfinis06265716 @YouTube

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253676784119414785

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @unfinis06265716 @YouTube There are good people and bad people in every group. It’s just IQ, Cognitive Masculinity: eschewing attention, priority for system(group) rather than empathy(individual), solving for Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth before Preference or Face, and Purity, Loyalty, and Hierarchy.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1253676784119414785

  • There are good people and bad people in every group. It’s just IQ, Cognitive Mas

    There are good people and bad people in every group. It’s just IQ, Cognitive Masculinity: eschewing attention, priority for system(group) rather than empathy(individual), solving for Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth before Preference or Face, and Purity, Loyalty, and Hierarchy.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 13:26:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253676784119414785

    Reply addressees: @unfinis06265716 @YouTube

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253671572696526848

  • THE DEPENDENCE ON LAND AND THE VARIATION IN GROUP STRATEGIES –“I was working th

    THE DEPENDENCE ON LAND AND THE VARIATION IN GROUP STRATEGIES

    –“I was working the rather large winter garden this afternoon I have planted with my father.

    Thinking about the respective Peloponnesian and Delian strategies. It got me thinking about two things. Agricultural productivity / output and the concurrent effervescence of commercial activity, economic growth, and thus civilisational expansion (consider this also in a Rome vs Carthage context too).

    The second angle was the context of one’s own personal independence and self-sovereignty, in this sense as a landowner, either large or small scale. Be it in terms of food supply, land as a hold of value, and also as an individual / family / community area with which to defend one’s own assets.

    Whilst Australia and America have different cultures and expressions of “homesteading” there are some similarities too, you might call it a “dying frontier of the self-owned man”.

    Do you have any pointers or suggestions from a Propertarian standpoint?”— A Friend

    Yes, you have the correct insight, that I would translate as “If a man is dependent upon the land, he intuits others are also dependent upon the land, and that he cannot defend his land nor can others without collective defense of land, and collective defense by almost everyone.

    This is the opposite of migratory pastoralists and disaporic traders (Carthage), or diasporic usurers (Jews), or diasporic thieves(gypsies), or diasporic raiders(muslims), diasporic rent seekers(russians, mongols), but not the same as settled(germans, spartans) or diasporic producers (europeans, chinese – and what should have been hindus).

    That is because we specialize in different strategies and our value of territory, built capital, institutional, and cultural commons, differs by where our revenue comes from and the composition of our ‘armies’ and the strategy that these men use for control of predation (raiding), parasitism (extractive rule, usury, theft), or domestication (productive rule, settlement, common capital production.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 12:15:00 UTC

  • The Lesson of Comparative Civilizations

    [S]o, what is the lesson we learn from our study of history? That european peoples are able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically, faster than all other peoples because of our traditions of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life, where the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, thereby advancing productive innovations in each others interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, thereby allowing us to divert proceeds of our production to the commons and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, economic and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it.

  • The Lesson of Comparative Civilizations

    [S]o, what is the lesson we learn from our study of history? That european peoples are able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically, faster than all other peoples because of our traditions of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life, where the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, thereby advancing productive innovations in each others interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, thereby allowing us to divert proceeds of our production to the commons and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, economic and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it.