Theme: Ethnoculture

  • From 2018: Predictions

    (reminder to repost via James Knowles) —“Given the current accelerating rate of ideological and racial polarization, how likely is it in America that the country will enter an era of large-scale sectarian violence at some point in this century?”— A Friend

    by Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine I’ve stated since 2006 that we would have a violent revolution between 2020 and 2025. I stated that the economy would fail by 2008 (it did) would not recover until at least ‘14 (I was right), that would peak its recovery in ‘17/18 (I was right) and that the next correction would coincide with demographic, political, and economic collapse, at the very same moment that american military and political power would be impossible to sustain the remains of the british empire we inherited at the war’s end. (I will be correct.) I know this because of economics, demographics, the conflict of civilizations, and the great power struggles that result. The entire suite of socialist experiments worldwide across the 20th century have failed, and so the right (classical liberal rule of law) would have won if not for immigration overwhelming the country via the six massive-immigration-cities. However, since the left was successful in achieving through third world immigration and the destruction of the nuclear family what they could not achieve through their ideas, the only solution to intolerable conflict is separation. Both Communist-Antifa/BLM/Soros and the Nationalist-Right Coalitions were very close to starting a war after the Trump victory overturned the left’s belief in victory, and had Charlottesville been slightly more violent such that the Right wingers defended themselves with the rather vast arsenal they had with them, it would have started there. But all that occurred in the aftermath has been the elimination of the nazi symbolism from the hard right, and the down-funding of BLM/Antifa by Soros, who has instead switched to funding the anti-gun movement to achieve the same ends. What’s occurring right now is that the Trump administration is serving as a sufficient proxy for violence. The right’s current plan is to wait until the left attempts to prosecute Trump for (correctly) attempting to shut down. The left is waiting for their long awaited win. Meanwhile the very few adults left in positions of power understand that any misstep by either side will result in the bloodiest civil war in human history. And I say that having a very clear understanding of how fragile our prosperity is, and how easy it is to fall into all against all fighting for food and water. We are going to have some sort of civil war, the outcome of which I suspect will be devolution of central powers to the states or regions, since this is the only means of preserving the military, retirement, and medical services, while cities, states, and regions determine their cultures, norms, and values. The principle change is that laws on permissible behavior and therefore citizenship will fragment into the old european model. After which the european experiment will follow suit. I know, this ‘reformation’ will occur, because I’m going to make certain of it. And I’m going to make certain of it for the simple reason that the civil war will happen and a random outcome after millions are dead and the world descends into war, is far worse than an agreeable settlement. Curt Doolittle

  • From 2018: Predictions

    (reminder to repost via James Knowles) —“Given the current accelerating rate of ideological and racial polarization, how likely is it in America that the country will enter an era of large-scale sectarian violence at some point in this century?”— A Friend

    by Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine I’ve stated since 2006 that we would have a violent revolution between 2020 and 2025. I stated that the economy would fail by 2008 (it did) would not recover until at least ‘14 (I was right), that would peak its recovery in ‘17/18 (I was right) and that the next correction would coincide with demographic, political, and economic collapse, at the very same moment that american military and political power would be impossible to sustain the remains of the british empire we inherited at the war’s end. (I will be correct.) I know this because of economics, demographics, the conflict of civilizations, and the great power struggles that result. The entire suite of socialist experiments worldwide across the 20th century have failed, and so the right (classical liberal rule of law) would have won if not for immigration overwhelming the country via the six massive-immigration-cities. However, since the left was successful in achieving through third world immigration and the destruction of the nuclear family what they could not achieve through their ideas, the only solution to intolerable conflict is separation. Both Communist-Antifa/BLM/Soros and the Nationalist-Right Coalitions were very close to starting a war after the Trump victory overturned the left’s belief in victory, and had Charlottesville been slightly more violent such that the Right wingers defended themselves with the rather vast arsenal they had with them, it would have started there. But all that occurred in the aftermath has been the elimination of the nazi symbolism from the hard right, and the down-funding of BLM/Antifa by Soros, who has instead switched to funding the anti-gun movement to achieve the same ends. What’s occurring right now is that the Trump administration is serving as a sufficient proxy for violence. The right’s current plan is to wait until the left attempts to prosecute Trump for (correctly) attempting to shut down. The left is waiting for their long awaited win. Meanwhile the very few adults left in positions of power understand that any misstep by either side will result in the bloodiest civil war in human history. And I say that having a very clear understanding of how fragile our prosperity is, and how easy it is to fall into all against all fighting for food and water. We are going to have some sort of civil war, the outcome of which I suspect will be devolution of central powers to the states or regions, since this is the only means of preserving the military, retirement, and medical services, while cities, states, and regions determine their cultures, norms, and values. The principle change is that laws on permissible behavior and therefore citizenship will fragment into the old european model. After which the european experiment will follow suit. I know, this ‘reformation’ will occur, because I’m going to make certain of it. And I’m going to make certain of it for the simple reason that the civil war will happen and a random outcome after millions are dead and the world descends into war, is far worse than an agreeable settlement. Curt Doolittle

  • Individual and Group Differences

    INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP DIFFERENCES Differences in: 1) Physical, Cognitive, Verbal, ability – even differences in internal voice, and internal vision (about ten percent of the population lacks one or the other; or internal regulation (psychopathy vs sociopathy). 2) The importance of Trait-IQ vs Trait-Conscientiousness is the only innovation in my entire adult lifetime, in that success and wealth is dependent upon Conscientiousness, and IQ grants access to increasingly complex subject matter and rapidity of changing information, and this is due not necessarily to innovation but to rapidity of ability to learn anything and the attendant error detection. This is why people are equally successful across the IQ spectrum if they possess conscientiousness and unequally successful if they possess IQ alone – although this results in higher IQ people maintaining a superior distribution throughout the population which may be necessary for error reduction throughout the spectrum of people. 3) DIfferences between the two sexes are substantial, obvious, stereotypical, and the reasons are significant differences in brain structure and operation, with Lateral (whole-empathic-short-term vs Longitudinal (half-physical-long-term) producing extremely replicable results, the most common being the naxalt-vs-distribution perception, the priority of truth vs face/experience, the priority of physical vs experiential, the priority of empathic interpersonal vs systemic political. This is most visible at both the low end and high end where we see female psychological, social, and sexual expression of antisocial behavior and male physical and violent expression of antisocial behavior., 4) DIfference between moral intuitions: (masculine conservative capitalizing quality packs -vs- feminine consumptive, decapitalizing, quantity, herds) is rather obvious in the data, with the female herd strategy expressing all cognitive biases above and demonstrating near exclusive sensitivity to harm/care/proportionality, the libertarian or ascendant male demonstrating they also intuit demand for liberty and novelty, (finding the left parasitic and the right oppressive) and the conservative pack strategy demonstrating the entire spectrum equally, adding disgust/purity, loyalty/hierarchy. (Which is why conservatives and libertarians find leftists disgusting and disloyal) 5) In Races, Subraces, Tribes, and Classes, (degree of neotonic evolution and subsequent rate of sexual maturity, depth of sexual maturity, degree of emotional agency, and the resulting sexual market value, social market value, economic market value); 6) Value to one another is demonstrated by the evidence. If you require others to pay for you by sacrifice of their consumption and reproduction then you are a burden on others. In small heterogenous polities due to kin preference and selection and due to limited political competition, and in genetically middle class societies, people are more redistributive. DON”T ASK OTHERS TO LIE So when you say ‘racist, sexist, ableist’ you are saying you want others to lie – the point here being you may not be cognitively able to tolerate the truth given the feminine construction of your brain, such that you cannot distinguish between the preferable and the true. PROBLEM ONE Why? For the female her offspring are expensive investments that she must fool herself into continuing to pay the cost of, and her offspring as largely incompetent must be encouraged to continue to persist their genes despite the continuous feedback that they are of lower sexual, social, economic, political, market value to others than their existence, consumption, and reproduction warrants. PROBLEM TWO Worse? Add dunning kruger incompetence to those who have lower intelligence, lower conscientiousness, and a more feminine cognition, and you get those people who disagree with anything I wrote here. SCIENCE: START WITH Sex Differences in the Brain: Simon Baron Cohen. Differences in Moral Intuition: Jonathan Haidt Group differences in Genetics: Robert Reich. And my reading list: propertarianism.com/reading-list/ covers the rest. Which will take a lifetime unless like me your intelligence is far above the normal threshold, your memory is far above the normal threshold, and you are wealthy enough to devote otherwise unreasonable amounts of time to research.

  • Individual and Group Differences

    INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP DIFFERENCES Differences in: 1) Physical, Cognitive, Verbal, ability – even differences in internal voice, and internal vision (about ten percent of the population lacks one or the other; or internal regulation (psychopathy vs sociopathy). 2) The importance of Trait-IQ vs Trait-Conscientiousness is the only innovation in my entire adult lifetime, in that success and wealth is dependent upon Conscientiousness, and IQ grants access to increasingly complex subject matter and rapidity of changing information, and this is due not necessarily to innovation but to rapidity of ability to learn anything and the attendant error detection. This is why people are equally successful across the IQ spectrum if they possess conscientiousness and unequally successful if they possess IQ alone – although this results in higher IQ people maintaining a superior distribution throughout the population which may be necessary for error reduction throughout the spectrum of people. 3) DIfferences between the two sexes are substantial, obvious, stereotypical, and the reasons are significant differences in brain structure and operation, with Lateral (whole-empathic-short-term vs Longitudinal (half-physical-long-term) producing extremely replicable results, the most common being the naxalt-vs-distribution perception, the priority of truth vs face/experience, the priority of physical vs experiential, the priority of empathic interpersonal vs systemic political. This is most visible at both the low end and high end where we see female psychological, social, and sexual expression of antisocial behavior and male physical and violent expression of antisocial behavior., 4) DIfference between moral intuitions: (masculine conservative capitalizing quality packs -vs- feminine consumptive, decapitalizing, quantity, herds) is rather obvious in the data, with the female herd strategy expressing all cognitive biases above and demonstrating near exclusive sensitivity to harm/care/proportionality, the libertarian or ascendant male demonstrating they also intuit demand for liberty and novelty, (finding the left parasitic and the right oppressive) and the conservative pack strategy demonstrating the entire spectrum equally, adding disgust/purity, loyalty/hierarchy. (Which is why conservatives and libertarians find leftists disgusting and disloyal) 5) In Races, Subraces, Tribes, and Classes, (degree of neotonic evolution and subsequent rate of sexual maturity, depth of sexual maturity, degree of emotional agency, and the resulting sexual market value, social market value, economic market value); 6) Value to one another is demonstrated by the evidence. If you require others to pay for you by sacrifice of their consumption and reproduction then you are a burden on others. In small heterogenous polities due to kin preference and selection and due to limited political competition, and in genetically middle class societies, people are more redistributive. DON”T ASK OTHERS TO LIE So when you say ‘racist, sexist, ableist’ you are saying you want others to lie – the point here being you may not be cognitively able to tolerate the truth given the feminine construction of your brain, such that you cannot distinguish between the preferable and the true. PROBLEM ONE Why? For the female her offspring are expensive investments that she must fool herself into continuing to pay the cost of, and her offspring as largely incompetent must be encouraged to continue to persist their genes despite the continuous feedback that they are of lower sexual, social, economic, political, market value to others than their existence, consumption, and reproduction warrants. PROBLEM TWO Worse? Add dunning kruger incompetence to those who have lower intelligence, lower conscientiousness, and a more feminine cognition, and you get those people who disagree with anything I wrote here. SCIENCE: START WITH Sex Differences in the Brain: Simon Baron Cohen. Differences in Moral Intuition: Jonathan Haidt Group differences in Genetics: Robert Reich. And my reading list: propertarianism.com/reading-list/ covers the rest. Which will take a lifetime unless like me your intelligence is far above the normal threshold, your memory is far above the normal threshold, and you are wealthy enough to devote otherwise unreasonable amounts of time to research.

  • You take pride in ‘unity’ but we understand it is market competition between ‘si

    You take pride in ‘unity’ but we understand it is market competition between ‘similar’ people for status that gives them the incentive to invent.There is no reason chinese people cannot compete with western innovation, but we believe collapse and stress will come for all mankind.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 12:25:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259097279291699200

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259096802319613953


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @HaiTaoYang9 Again, Han culture not genetics. My comment above is correct. Europeans maintained local political authority but cultural homogeneity (christianity and law). So we had weak federal government (church) you have strong. But this is why china stagnated and europe advanced rapidly.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1259096802319613953

  • Again, Han culture not genetics. My comment above is correct. Europeans maintain

    Again, Han culture not genetics. My comment above is correct. Europeans maintained local political authority but cultural homogeneity (christianity and law). So we had weak federal government (church) you have strong. But this is why china stagnated and europe advanced rapidly.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 12:24:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259096802319613953

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259095825629581314

  • That is false right? Genetic information shows that the han (northern minority)

    That is false right? Genetic information shows that the han (northern minority) have been successful at ‘incremental conquest and integration’ of other tribes. In europe, many countries we used religion to unify culturally, in china one country used ‘hannishness’ to unify. https://t.co/jlhBZeuZN2


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 12:17:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259095114699472901

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259093631442419712

  • The map isn’t mine. I would have used an ethnographic map. The point of my post

    The map isn’t mine. I would have used an ethnographic map. The point of my post like many, is that china india and america are empires not countries, and that this is no longer an advantage for america. We do not need to police the world now that we made modernity.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 12:09:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259093187303440384

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259091490661228545

  • The UK built everything good in this world by dragging you barbarians out of pri

    The UK built everything good in this world by dragging you barbarians out of primitivism, in the hope you could be our equals.

    We were wrong. We can’t. You’re not able.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 11:53:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259089162873028608

    Reply addressees: @Garou_Hidalgo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259080084759117824

  • Make a list of the (few) things invented in china. Make a list of the (many) thi

    Make a list of the (few) things invented in china. Make a list of the (many) things invented in europe. White men invented 98%+ of everything despite (a) being a small population on the edge of the bronze age, and (b) the jewish-christian-islamic dark age.
    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000OVLJSC/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 02:24:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258945807530766338

    Reply addressees: @healingbyhenry @sunkiisss

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250420702995308547